Ablation Therapy for Arrhythmias

Last updated by Peer reviewed by Dr Hayley Willacy, FRCGP
Last updated Meets Patient’s editorial guidelines

Added to Saved items
This article is for Medical Professionals

Professional Reference articles are designed for health professionals to use. They are written by UK doctors and based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. You may find the Abnormal Heart Rhythms (Arrhythmias) article more useful, or one of our other health articles.

Read COVID-19 guidance from NICE

Treatment of almost all medical conditions has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. NICE has issued rapid update guidelines in relation to many of these. This guidance is changing frequently. Please visit https://www.nice.org.uk/covid-19 to see if there is temporary guidance issued by NICE in relation to the management of this condition, which may vary from the information given below.

Patients with cardiac arrhythmias may be asymptomatic, have serious symptoms and a poor quality of life, or present with sudden cardiac death.[1] Radiofrequency ablation has an increasingly important role in the management of cardiac arrhythmias. Ablation involves the destruction of re-entry circuits, which are often caused by a myocardial scar or a developmental anomaly. Although the incidence of complications is low, serious complications can occur and include valvular disruption, coronary occlusion, cerebrovascular accident and death.[2]

A cardiac catheter is introduced via the peripheral vascular system. A radiofrequency current is passed through an electrode on the end of the cardiac catheter. The lesions created are small, homogeneous and have no effect on cardiac function. The procedure may take several hours or even longer. The patient may feel slight discomfort during the ablation.

Patients appear to be particularly aware of their normal heartbeat after the procedure but this sensation disappears after a period of a few weeks. Patients do not require long-term follow-up if the arrhythmia has been cured.

Bleeding diatheses and coagulopathy are the main contraindication for catheter ablation. There are otherwise no absolute contraindications. Relative contraindications may include:

  • Vascular access contraindication:
    • Deep vein thrombosis for femoral vein access.
    • Peripheral arterial disease and aortic dissection in case of retrograde aortic approach.
  • Intracardiac thrombi (risk of embolisation).

The main indications for catheter ablation are:

Other indications for catheter ablation include:

  • Symptomatic drug-refractory idiopathic sinus tachycardia.
  • Lifestyle-impairing ectopic beats.
  • Symptomatic junctional ectopic tachycardia.

Atrial fibrillation

  • Although antiarrhythmic drugs are useful, ablation therapy has become a primary therapeutic strategy for atrial fibrillation.[5]
  • The success rate of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is superior to the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs. Sinus rhythm is restored in approximately 85% of cases at one year and 52% at five years. Longer duration of atrial fibrillation and increased size of the left atrium increase the risk of recurrence.[6]
  • Ablation is also associated with a complication rate of 2-3%.[7]

    Indications for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation:[8]
    • Symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to at least one antiarrhythmic medication: recommended for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, reasonable for persistent atrial fibrillation and may be considered for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.
    • Symptomatic atrial fibrillation prior to initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with an antiarrhythmic agent: reasonable for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and may be considered for persistent and for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.
  • Ablation may be more successful in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation rather than persistent atrial fibrillation.[9]
  • Radiofrequency catheter ablation seems to be more effective than medical therapy as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in relatively young and otherwise healthy patients but may also cause more severe adverse effects.[10]
  • Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is a treatment option for symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to antiarrhythmic drug therapy or where medical therapy is contra-indicated because of comorbidity or intolerance.[11]
  • Radiofrequency ablation of the atria can be performed via a catheter introduced through a femoral vein or by surgical radiofrequency ablation in patients undergoing concomitant open heart surgery.[12]
  • Cryoablation or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation may be used in the management of atrial fibrillation for patients undergoing concomitant open heart surgery - eg, mitral valve replacement or repair.[13, 14]
  • Microwave ablation of the atria for patients with atrial fibrillation can be performed via a catheter introduced through a femoral vein or by surgical microwave ablation in patients undergoing concomitant open heart surgery.[15]
  • In experienced hands, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation can be eliminated in more than 85% of patients by ablation lasting less than three hours and with a risk of complications of 1-2%. Success rates are lower for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.[16]
  • However, there are only limited long-term data on the safety and efficacy of ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation ablation.[9]

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) does not currently recommend percutaneous (non-thoracoscopic) epicardial catheter radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.[17]

SVTs and atrial flutter

  • Catheter ablation has been extensively employed as a well-tolerated, often curative therapy for SVT.[18]
  • Studies of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of patients with typical atrial flutter and atrioventricular node-dependent SVT report high efficacy rates and low rates of complications.[19]
  • Ablation may be considered as first-line in some situations (eg, a symptomatic patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome). Selective radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway is an ideal method to treat most patients with AVNRT.[20] However, for patients with rhythm disturbances that are likely to resolve spontaneously (eg, atrial tachycardia) or unlikely to recur (eg, a first episode of atrial flutter), ablation would not be appropriate first-line therapy.[2]
  • The common forms of SVT (eg, AVNRT, SVT associated with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) are treatable with a success rate up to 95%. Cure rates for unifocal atrial tachycardia and common right atrial flutter are about 90%. Recurrent tachyarrhythmias can occur in the first few months after ablation but these may be curable with a second procedure.
  • Catheter ablation of atrial flutter is usually effective but there is a small risk of recurrent atrial flutter and also a risk of atrial fibrillation during follow-up.[21] However, radiofrequency catheter ablation is considered to be a relatively safe and effective procedure for the therapeutic treatment of typical atrial flutter.[22]

Ventricular arrhythmias[23, 24]

  • Most ventricular arrhythmias result from myocardial scarring, most often caused by myocardial infarction. Ablation is not usually curative but may make the rhythm disturbance easier to control by means of antiarrhythmic agents or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).
  • Ablation can often be used as an alternative to antiarrhythmic drug therapy for controlling frequent episodes of VT.
  • Idiopathic VT is curable with a success rate of about 80%. Ablation is therefore an alternative to antiarrhythmic drugs for controlling frequent VT episodes. Ablation of multiple VTs and unstable VTs is often possible but is usually adjunctive therapy to an ICD in these patients.
  • VTs associated with structural heart disease can be treated by catheter ablation but the success rate is much lower (about 50%).

Ablation is associated with a significant risk of complications, some of which might result in life-long disability and/or death. Available data has indicated an overall incidence of complications of 6.29%, with in-hospital mortality of 0.46%.

  • Cardiac complications - eg, high-grade atrioventricular block, cardiac tamponade, coronary artery spasm or thrombosis, pericarditis, valve trauma.
  • Vascular complications - eg, retroperitoneal bleeding, haematoma, vascular Injury, transient ischaemic attack or stroke, hypotension, thromboembolism, air embolism.
  • Pulmonary complications - eg, pulmonary hypertension (secondary to pulmonary vein stenosis), pneumothorax.
  • Other potential complications include left atrial-oesophageal fistula, acute pyloric spasm or gastric hypomotility, phrenic nerve paralysis, radiation or electrically induced skin damage, infection at access site, inappropriate sinus tachycardia and pro-arrhythmia.
  • Radiation risk (low).
  • Ablation of a pathway close to the atrioventricular node may require implantation of a pacemaker.
  • Cardiac wall perforation is rare.

Are you protected against flu?

See if you are eligible for a free NHS flu jab today.

Check now

Further reading and references

  1. Camm AJ; Cardiac arrhythmias--trials and tribulations. Lancet. 2012 Oct 27380(9852):1448-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61773-5.

  2. Tracy CM, Akhtar M, DiMarco JP, et al; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2006 update of the Circulation. 2006 Oct 10114(15):1654-68. Epub 2006 Sep 20.

  3. Dewire J, Calkins H; Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation to Maintain Sinus Rhythm. J Atr Fibrillation. 2013 Feb 125(5):739. doi: 10.4022/jafib.739. eCollection 2013 Feb-Mar.

  4. Tung R, Boyle NG, Shivkumar K; Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2011 May 24123(20):2284-8.

  5. Chung MK, Refaat M, Shen WK, et al; Atrial Fibrillation: JACC Council Perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1475(14):1689-1713. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.025.

  6. European Society of Cardiology; Guidelines for Management of Atrial Fibrillation, 2020

  7. Verma A, Macle L, Cox J, et al; Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines 2010: catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter. Can J Cardiol. 2011 Jan-Feb27(1):60-6.

  8. Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Rhythm Society, 2017.

  9. Lubitz SA, Fischer A, Fuster V; Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2008 Apr 12336(7648):819-26.

  10. Hakalahti A, Biancari F, Nielsen JC, et al; Radiofrequency ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2015 Mar17(3):370-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu376. Epub 2015 Feb 1.

  11. Percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation; NICE Interventional procedure guidance, April 2006

  12. Radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in association with other cardiac surgery; NICE Interventional procedure guidance, May 2005

  13. Cryoablation for atrial fibrillation in association with other cardiac surgery; NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance, May 2005

  14. High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for atrial fibrillation as an associated procedure with other cardiac surgery; NICE Interventional procedure guidance, July 2006

  15. Microwave ablation for atrial fibrillation in association with other cardiac surgery; NICE Interventional procedure guidance, May 2005

  16. Shah D; Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: mechanism-based curative treatment. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2004 Nov2(6):925-33.

  17. Percutaneous (non-thoracoscopic) epicardial catheter radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation; NICE Interventional procedure guidance, March 2009

  18. Sohinki D, Obel OA; Current trends in supraventricular tachycardia management. Ochsner J. 2014 Winter14(4):586-95.

  19. Spector P, Reynolds MR, Calkins H, et al; Meta-analysis of ablation of atrial flutter and supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Sep 1104(5):671-7.

  20. Lee PC, Chen SA, Hwang B; Atrioventricular node anatomy and physiology: implications for ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009 Mar24(2):105-12.

  21. Calkins H, Canby R, Weiss R, et al; Results of catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Aug 1594(4):437-42.

  22. Rodgers M, McKenna C, Palmer S, et al; Curative catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation and typical atrial flutter: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2008 Nov12(34):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-198.

  23. Stevenson WG; Catheter ablation of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2005 Jan20(1):42-7.

  24. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death; European Society of Cardiology (August 2015)

  25. Arai M, Okumura Y, Nagashima K, et al; Adverse Clinical Events during Long-Term Follow-Up After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Int Heart J. 2019 Jul 2760(4):812-821. doi: 10.1536/ihj.18-517. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

  26. Cheng R, Chang M, Yuan Ng C; Risks from Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Methods, Efficacy, and Safety. J Atr Fibrillation. 2012 Apr 144(6):455. doi: 10.4022/jafib.455. eCollection 2012 Apr-May.

newnav-downnewnav-up