Chemotherapy
Posted , 8 users are following.
Has anyone with GCA had chemotherapy for it a friend of mine with PMR and GCA has been told thats what she needs. I keep telling her to join this forum but she is not good with a computer, I have found it so useful, I was diagnosed in Nov 14 and went from 15mg to 12,5,11,10 and from then on a drop of .5 all of it for a month at a time, i am now on 6mg and its looking good fingers crossed, i would like to thank all you good people in giving me the confidence to control the preds, my Dr has just let me get on with it, i do get tired but i havnt slept properly for years so no change there. I am on AA and dont really want to be, has it actually changed anyones dexa results after 5yrs. I do think how lucky i am not to suffer like some of you so thanks again Liz
1 like, 17 replies
ptolemy liz12234
Posted
I have heard that there has been some research done on killing off the immune system with chemo and then letting it become reborn again, this was not for PMR/GCA but for another auto immune disease. I am not sure if this is still on mice or they have now tried it on humans. I don't think I want to be in the queue for it!
Oregonjohn-UK liz12234
Posted
faye______00403 liz12234
Posted
not sure I'd do it.....do be extra vigilant in checking this out!!
I have been on Fossamax before and did get to a point where
dexa showed that I could stop taking it....I was doing well until
the nightmare called pred came into my life.
liz12234 faye______00403
Posted
Nefret liz12234
Posted
Their effectiveness is in some doubt and they are only used for PMR, they are not (as far as I know) used for GCA and I believe there has been some research which shows they don't work for it.
I was 'lucky' in that I was unable to take the biphosphonates for bone protection - lucky in that I would have refused it anyway and I was fine on just Calcium and Vit D tabs for some eight years. Then I needed some help.......supposing I'd been on AA already for 5 years and now 3 years later needed bone protection? There wouldn't be anything standard which I could have been given - what a mess it would have been.
liz12234 Nefret
Posted
Susanne_M_UK Nefret
Posted
Nefret Susanne_M_UK
Posted
EileenH Susanne_M_UK
Posted
Susanne_M_UK EileenH
Posted
I believe he thought they had new drugs not available for him to prescribe. As it turned out, they told me they didn't have any such drugs and I reluctantly started MTX.
I saw my rheumy at St G's yesterday and he agreed for me to try to taper by 2.5mg/week (currently on 35mg following flare) until I get to 25mg, (even that may be too quick though) and then by 1mg every 3 weeks. He hopes that by the time I get to my sticking point of 20-25mg, the MTX will have kicked in.
If it doesn't kick in by the time I see him again mid June, I will ask him about the new drug.
EileenH Susanne_M_UK
Posted
I don't understand that view at all. In RA methotrexate takes about 6 months to "kick in" fully, that is a perfectly reasonable wait to see if it works and if it doesn't in that time they start to consider the next drug on the list. In PMR however, the generally accepted theory is that the MTX doesn't have any effect on the PMR itself but changes the way the body metabolises the pred and allows a given dose to have more effect. Over and above that is the concept that about 1 in 6 patients originally given a diagnosis of PMR have that dx changed at some point, more often than not to one of LORA, where MTX will probably work.
In the case of GCA I just don't understand where MTX fits in except in the hope that this patient will have the steroid-enhancing effect. It is something I discussed with the local rheumy here - he said exactly the same and that he had just been at a rheumatology meeting in Germany where the same opinion had been expressed.
Do I remember rightly - you had a positive TAB? Such a shame you weren't offered a place on the trial - there was at least a chance you'd have been given TCZ and I think in the later stages everybody was given it.
I really do hope the MTX works for you and you have none of the side-effects.
Susanne_M_UK EileenH
Posted
As I understand it, rheumy believes the MTX will allow me to taper the pred to an acceptable level. Whether that will work, I don't know. They are always referring to me as an "atypical case" because my markers are not always raised when I have a flare.
EileenH Susanne_M_UK
Posted
EileenH liz12234
Posted
I suppose it depends what you define as chemotherapy. There are forms of vasculitis that are managed using cyclophosphamide - which is a drug used in chemotherapy for cancer - and also other drugs from the same stable. However - there are NO studies that show that it, or any other drug used for chemotherapy as we normally think of it will work for GCA which is a quite specific form of vasculitis and for which pred remains the mainstay of management.
There has recently been a clinical study done in GCA using a monoclonal antibody(mab) called tocilizumab but it of itself is not a chemotherapy drug and is usually used for rheumatoid arthritis. You can combine a mab with a chemo drug so the drug gets to the place it needs to be, the tumour, but that doesn't apply in GCA - it is inflammation not a tumour.
Methotrexate is "chemotherapy" - but at a very different dose for cancer. There is no real evidence it works in GCA but is suggested in the most recent guidelines as an add-in if a patient relapses more than once or cannot reduce their dose of pred. Our experience is that if you reduce in small enough steps and at long enough intervals you can reduce the dose quite well without it.
Now you have been on AA for 5 years you need to prod your doctors. You need a dexascan to see the real state of your bones - and you need to consider a change to something different if you need it. AA should not be used for more than 5 years(says the FDA) because beyond that the risks of some of the more unpleasant side effects increase a lot. There are 2 ladies on the forums who developed shin splints in one and bilateral spontaneous fractured femurs in the other after less than 2 years - both due to use of AA.
But without a bit more info about your friend - can't really say a lot more. Can't you sit down with her and guide her through the maze?
liz12234 EileenH
Posted
EileenH liz12234
Posted