PAE and Artery Selection to be embolized
Posted , 9 users are following.
Just another question to the forum and if anyone can shed some light. I guess that may be several arteries that feed the prostate. So when they embolize the artery, can one radiologist embolize certain arteries, while another radiologist may embolize other arteries, causing different results in the two cases. So will an experienced radiologist select the better arteries to be embolized? Or is it so that any radiologist would embolize the same arteries and would produce the similar results.
2 likes, 14 replies
craig84609 patrick196
Posted
stan38413 patrick196
Posted
peter03536 patrick196
Posted
About two months have since elapsed and I am peeing three times the quantities compared with before treatment and sleep the whole night without interruption. My bladder now empties completely.
My sex life has improved too and I couldn't be happier.
Having a followup MRI scan next week to see how it's all looking.
PAE in the UK is in its early days and only suitable patients who don't have too many other complications are selected to go onto what amounts to a clinical trial, so the success rate is high.
At the moment the only centres doing PAE in the UK are the Freeman hospital in Newcastle upon Tyne and the Southampton university hospital. The total number of patients treated so far at these two centres in the last two years since their first patient is in the low hundreds, which is not many.
I wish you all the best with your treatment Patrick
Peter03536
stan38413 peter03536
Posted
How long did it take for you to see the improvement in urinary frequency and increase in volume?
Thanks.
peter03536 stan38413
Posted
craig84609 patrick196
Posted
AndreUflackerMD craig84609
Posted
It certainly is an option in the US, both within and outside clinical trials. I would strongly recommend PAE within a clinical trial, however, as there are many unanswered questions about it.
Medicare is paying for men to get PAE and the necessary diagnostics prior to and the follow up visits in our trial at UVA. For men with private insurance, it's on a case by case basis, but the majority of policies will not cover the procedure because it's investigational.
Thanks,
A
AndreUflackerMD patrick196
Posted
This is a great question. As an Interventional Radiologist studying this procedure and the effects on BPH, the anatomy to me is one of the most interesting aspects.
Most men have 1 or 2 prostatic arteries supplying the prostate per pelvic half. So for example, you may have 1 artery on the right and 2 on the left. These arteries may supply distinct portions of the prostate gland, namely the center of the gland versus the periphery of the gland. In rare cases, a pelvic half may have 3 arteries.
There is some thought that the Anterolateral Prostatic branch, which is the branch which supplies the central part of the prostate, is the ideal target for PAE. There is a Posterolateral Branch, which feeds the capsule of the prostate gland, and prostate tissue to a lesser extent. This is based on literature from Pisco and Bilhim, who are from the group in Portugal that has extensively studied the pelvic arterial anatomy.
Most Interventionalists performing PAE today will try to target both branches. If only one branch can be targeted, we ideally want to target the anterolateral branch to get to the center of the gland around the urethra, which is likely the cause of the BPH symptoms. The most important thing to understand about PAE is that the anatomy is extremely difficult due to the small size of the vessels, and at this point we don't really know exactly why men with BPH symptoms improve after PAE. So we don't know if we need to treat both branches, or just one, etc...
However, in most cases, the Anterolateral branch and Posterolateral branch usually arise from a common trunk. This means that if we can put a catheter into that common trunk, we can treat both branches, and the whole prostate, from that position. If the enlargement of the prostate is caused by continued hormone exposure, then blocking all of the branches would be important.
This is an extremely intersting question which we hope to answer by prospective trials. Like you mentioned, it's possible that if there is variabilty in which arteries we embolize, this is going to translate in variable results.
Thanks for the great question. Feel free to ask anything!
Regards,
Andre Uflacker, MD
University of Virginia, Interventional Radiology
waveydavey AndreUflackerMD
Posted
The PAE would be performed by a team of radiologists who have only performed five procedures-four of them on permanently catheterised patients.
Thanks for your thoughts.
peter03536 waveydavey
Posted
I had my PAE done 2 months ago and the initial outcome has been very good.
AndreUflackerMD peter03536
Posted
We have data showing that PAE is effective in about 70-80% of men at 2 years. Beyond that we do not have any idea if the benefit from PAE is sustainable. I would agree that everyone that gets a PAE should consider the fact that the results may not be sustainable beyond this time period and that one may require additional therapies.
patrick196 AndreUflackerMD
Posted
Thank you very much for your feedback, it is greatly appreciated.I am 56 years old and my prostate size is 60 and have two median lobes. Well I am going to do the PAE procedure soon. But for personal reasons I cannot mention the hospital or the doctors names. We are four men doing it. My urologist refered me to the trial. I am third in line to do it. The radiologist doing it has done over 1000 embolizations on women an fibroids and is now venturing unto prostates. So he is going to be trained that day by a radiologist who has done over 200 PAE's . Everyone in this forum keeps saying to get your PAE done by a radiologist who has done at least 50. That is why I am worried. My urologist has assured me that they will be extra careful during the procedure and not to worry as the experienced radiologist will guide him carefully through the procedure. Thank you once again.
Patrick
tom86211 AndreUflackerMD
Posted
In Sept. 2014 I had HDR Brachytherapy treatment for Gleason 6 prostate cancer. All went well and my PSA is now 0.3 and stable. However, I still have issues with an enlarged median lobe and really wanted to have the PAE procedure done last year. However, the IR doctors turned me down because of the prior radiation to the prostate. Are you aware of anyone who has had the PAE procedure after having had prior radiation of the prostate?
Tom
AndreUflackerMD tom86211
Posted
I'm sorry that I don't know the answer to that. We really don't know how your prostate would respond to PAE.
Theoretically, radiotherapy makes the PAE procedure higher risk, because we have radiation damage to nearby blood vessels. The likelyhood of success from PAE after radiation may also be lower because of the altered blood vessels. We just don't know what actually would happen with PAE.
While we still have blood flow to the prostate, the radiation damage will make the blood supply to other parts of the pelvis like bladder and rectum, be somewhat reduced.
The risk would be that when you embolize the prostate, inevitably some blood flow reduction to the bladder and/or rectum occurs, mostly not clinically significant, which may not be made up for by collateral flow which would be expected in an otherwise normal (non-radiated pelvis).
That said, we do perform embolization of bladder vessels routinely for bleeding, including in patients that have had pelvic radiotherapy before. Causing infarcts to the bladder, even after radiotherapy, with embolization is very very rare, maybe around 1-2% of cases. I would expect that PAE would be a viable alternative in patients with prostate radiation, but we are not sure of the risks/benefits yet. This is a question that we would like to answer as well, but it will take time.
Thanks for the question.
Regards,
Andre Uflacker, MD