Radiation risks with PAE
Posted , 11 users are following.
I have been trying to decide whether it best I have PAE or Urolift to help with my BPH symptoms (60g prostate, urinary retention, nocturia) I had almost decided on PAE after reading so many positive reviews, but now I am concerned about the levels of radiation, because over the past 10 years i have had countless CT's (about 30) due to various health issues.
I have been unable to find the exact amount of radiation involved with PAE, but I believe the procedure is done with fluoroscopy which takes in excess of 2 hours, in addition to the initial angiogram.
A standard chest CT is 7mSv, and I have read that a lengthy fluoroscope is in excess of 50 mSv. For a 2 hour+ procedure, it may well be much more than 50mSv I would imagine. That is a lot of radiation!
Anyone care to comment on the radiation risks or otherwise of PAE?
0 likes, 34 replies
dan93230 mal7896
Posted
Dan
peter06599 dan93230
Posted
dan93230 peter06599
Posted
However, I think I'm now leaning toward Urolift in any case. There are two good studies done showing its efficacy and durability. I'm not aware of any such completed studies for PAE. PAE studies are taking place right now, in the US, UK, etc. That, of course, is because it's newer. Per one study: "At one month after treatment, 86% of UroLift patients would recommend the procedure to a friend or relative whereas only 73% of TURP patients would recommend the procedure." Having said that, if PAE were offered conveniently nearby and covered, I might try it.
If you want, I could send you my request for "pre-determination" for Urolift to my company, which they approved. Just send me a private email (click on the envelope).
Dan
peter06599 dan93230
Posted
michael8714 peter06599
Posted
william79680 michael8714
Posted
arlington peter06599
Posted
From reading these forums PAE seems to be a preferable procedure to urolift both in terms of outcomes and long term side effects. I also have Aetna and so far they have denied it. I think it is just a matter of time until they cover it but we may be a bit too early. (I'm not sure when it was approved by FDA). I'm probably going to go forward with the PAE without coverage.
peter06599 michael8714
Posted
peter06599 arlington
Posted
dan93230 arlington
Posted
EFFICACY: More evidence for Urolift (2 solid studies for Urolift; no completed studies yet on PAE efficacy). In these forums, both procedures have fans and those who weren't helped much.
RECOVERY: seems PAE easier (but after 2-3 days, how much does it matter?)
POTENTIAL LATER SIDE EFFECTS: ??? 4 stints in one's body vs lots of tiny balls in one's blood vessels.
Dan
kenneth1955 dan93230
Posted
michael72708 dan93230
Posted
william79680 mal7896
Posted
i would speak peak to a Radiologist who performs PAE to get a definitive answer to your question. Speculation here would be just that. I can tell you that I had a PAE in April and it has been the most positive life changing thing I have ever done. Unfortunately I can not tell you what was going on during the procedure. It did take about two hours, was painless, but I was in the twilight zone during the procedure. I was awake so I am told, but not aware of anything happening or of the time involved.
mal7896 william79680
Posted
arlington mal7896
Posted
mal7896 arlington
Posted