Acute Stress Reaction

Jake11214 hello2257 deborah56051 8894 Users are discussing this topic

PatientPlus articles are written by UK doctors and are based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. They are designed for health professionals to use, so you may find the language more technical than the condition leaflets.

See also: Acute Stress Reaction written for patients

Synonyms: acute crisis reaction, shock, psychic shock, battle fatigue

An acute stress reaction is a psychological condition that can develop after exposure, and as a response, to a stressful event.

There are some challenges around the diagnosis related to differences between ICD–10 and DSM-5. DSM-5 recognises a condition called acute stress disorder. The Royal College of Psychiatrists has highlighted that the DSM classification is a system used in the USA for diagnosis but outside the USA it is primarily used for research purposes. In general, psychiatrists in Europe refer to the ICD. In the UK, ICD–10 is the official classification system for mental health professionals working in NHS clinical practice.[1] 

There is no condition of acute stress disorder in ICD–10 and an acute stress reaction is described as:

A transient disorder that develops in an individual without any other apparent mental disorder in response to exceptional physical and mental stress and that usually subsides within hours or days. Individual vulnerability and coping capacity play a role in the occurrence and severity of acute stress reactions.[1] 

One of the key features of an acute stress reaction is that, in common with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), it is believed to arise as a direct consequence of an exceptionally stressful life event. The stressful events or the continuing unpleasant circumstances are the primary causal factor - quite simply, the disorder would not occur without their effect. Acute stress reaction, again in common with conditions such as PTSD and adjustment disorders, is often regarded as a maladaptive response to severe or continued stress which then interferes with coping mechanisms.[2] 

NEW - log your activity

  • Notes
    Add notes to any clinical page and create a reflective diary
  • Track
    Automatically track and log every page you have viewed
  • Print
    Print and export a summary to use in your appraisal
Click to find out more »

Traumatic events and risk factors

Traumatic events may vary hugely and are specific to the individual. Usually the precipitating event is, or is perceived as, life-threatening. The point about perception is clear - a replica gun couldn't kill someone but if someone felt they were at risk of being shot this would very likely be a traumatic event to them.

Other typical examples include serious accidents, natural disasters, violent assaults and rarer events such as terrorist incidents. It can also result from sexual assault, following rape or child sexual abuse. The trauma can be ongoing such as in the cases of domestic violence or recurring sexual abuse. People suffering from acute traumatic stress may be injured as a result of the event, or they may be witnesses to the traumatic event.

There were more than 196,000 people reported as road casualties in the UK in 2012.[3] These individuals are at direct risk of acute stress reactions but many more people will have been involved but uninjured. Others may have also been indirectly affected as witnesses and could be at risk of acute stress reactions.

Refugees and asylum seekers are more likely to have suffered the sort of trauma that could lead to acute stress reactions. Subsequently, they are then at much higher risk of PTSD than the general population in their new countries of settlement.[4] 

First responders - eg, police, ambulance personnel, firemen - are by definition more likely to be exposed to traumatic events and are known to be at increased risk of PTSD.[5] Within these groups there may be some self selection for inherent resilience but this cannot be assumed to be protective. Military personnel are at risk of exposure to potential precipitating events and this is known to place them at risk of PTSD.[6] 

Acute stress reaction symptoms typically refer to symptoms of intrusion, avoidance and hyperarousal. These then lead to impairment of social functioning and daily life. Acute traumatic stress is generally limited to the first month after a potentially traumatic event - in people who have these symptoms lasting longer than one month, people should be assessed for PTSD. The pattern of symptoms is described in ICD-10:

The symptoms show a typically mixed and changing picture and include an initial state of 'daze' with some constriction of the field of consciousness and narrowing of attention, inability to comprehend stimuli, and disorientation. This state may be followed either by further withdrawal from the surrounding situation, or by agitation and over-activity (flight reaction or fugue). Autonomic signs of panic anxiety (tachycardia, sweating, flushing) are commonly present. The symptoms usually appear within minutes of the impact of the stressful stimulus or event, and disappear within two to three days (often within hours). Partial or complete amnesia for the episode may be present. If the symptoms persist, a change in diagnosis should be considered.[1] 

Other typical symptoms of acute stress reactions include:

  • Intrusion. This is often described as 're-experiencing'. The person will get spontaneous memories of the traumatic event, or there may be recurrent dreams and/or flashbacks. Typically these are intense and cause psychological distress.
  • Avoidance. The person will try to avoid expressing thoughts or feelings which will trigger reminders of the event.
  • Hyperarousal. This could be expressed through reckless or aggressive behaviour. This can be self-destructive. There may be sleep disturbance and people can be hyper-vigilant - for instance, this may be demonstrated when they are easily startled.
  • Mood-related. This may involve negative thoughts and mood or feelings - they may feel estranged from others, blame themselves, or have reduced enjoyment and interest in activities.

There are a number of conditions that could present similarly to an acute stress reaction. They may also co-exist in someone who suffers from an acute stress reaction:

Other conditions that may need to be considered include:

  • Depression. Anxiety and depression frequently co-exist and low mood is a common feature of an acute stress disorder.
  • Schizophrenia. Occasionally, psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia may initially present with anxiety. Any abnormal thoughts and ideas should be explored.
  • Dementia. This can be associated with both anxiety and depression. The separate article Screening for Cognitive Impairment gives examples of simple and well-validated tests.
  • Alcohol misuse. This can co-exist in any person who has an anxiety or psychological disorder and may also be the cause of anxiety-like symptoms if withdrawal symptoms are experienced.

No treatment may be required, as symptoms may abate within hours and days of the stressful event. Some people will experience more severe and prolonged symptoms which will require further help.

There is still little evidence on which to make definite recommendations on the benefits of problem-solving counselling or psycho-education in adults or children and adolescents.[2] 

Trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT)

A Cochrane review in 2010 suggested that early psychological interventions following traumatic events are effective. In particular, individual TF-CBT was more effective than waiting list intervention and supportive counselling.[7] TF-CBT usually involves exposure treatment and/or direct challenge of those negative and often unhelpful trauma-related thoughts. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that CBT with a trauma focus should be considered in adults with acute traumatic stress symptoms that are causing significant impairment in daily functioning.[2] 

Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR)[8] 

This therapy is based on the idea that unprocessed memories are the cause of negative thoughts and feelings. It is an integrative psychotherapy approach with a set of standardised protocols, principles and procedures. One technique uses eye movements to help the brain process traumatic events, although this is but one part of the entire therapy. The goal of EMDR is to reduce distress in the shortest period of time. It should only be conducted by an appropriately trained therapist. The WHO felt there was still insufficient evidence to make a specific recommendation on its use in acute traumatic stress in the first month after a potentially traumatic event in adults or children and adolescents.[2] 


The WHO produced guidelines in 2013 in which they specifically stated that benzodiazepines should not be offered to adults to reduce acute traumatic stress symptoms in the first month after a potentially traumatic event. They also suggested that appropriate advice on relaxation techniques and sleep hygiene should be given to those with insomnia and hypnotics should not be offered.[2] 

The British National Formulary states that benzodiazepines are indicated for the short-term relief of severe anxiety only. They should be used in the lowest possible dose for the shortest period of time.[9] In general, their use should be avoided given the risks of tolerance and dependence.

Most people will suffer from short-lived symptoms which will abate within a few days and will not go on longer than a month.

Evidence from the use of the DSM-IV classification for acute stress disorder has shown that it has a reasonably good predictive power for PTSD - the majority of people with a diagnosis of acute stress disorder will go on to develop PTSD. However, it also has low sensitivity - ie most people with PTSD would not have been diagnosed with acute stress disorder at first.[10][11] 

In any case, acute stress reaction is not based on the same criteria as acute stress disorder and it is not possible to comment on the percentage of people who will have chronic problems. However, there are short-term evidence-based interventions to help people with acute stress reactions that can be considered if someone presents with an acute stress reaction. 

Further reading & references

  1. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders; World Health Organization
  2. Guidelines for the management of conditions specifically related to stress; Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO), 2013
  3. Reported Road Casualties in Great Britain: 2012 Annual Report; Department of Transport, 26 September 2013
  4. Bogic M, Ajdukovic D, Bremner S, et al; Factors associated with mental disorders in long-settled war refugees: refugees from the former Yugoslavia in Germany, Italy and the UK. Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;200(3):216-23. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.084764. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
  5. Haugen PT, Evces M, Weiss DS; Treating posttraumatic stress disorder in first responders: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;32(5):370-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
  6. Iversen AC, Fear NT, Ehlers A, et al; Risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder among UK Armed Forces personnel. Psychol Med. 2008 Apr;38(4):511-22. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
  7. Roberts NP, Kitchiner NJ, Kenardy J, Bisson JI. Early psychological interventions to treat acute traumatic stress symptoms (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD007944. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007944.pub2.
  8. van den Hout MA, Bartelski N, Engelhard IM; On EMDR: Eye movements during retrieval reduce subjective vividness and objective memory accessibility during future recall. Cogn Emot. 2013 Jan;27(1):177-83. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.691087. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
  9. British National Formulary; 66th Edition (September 2013) British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, London
  10. Bryant RA; Acute stress disorder as a predictor of posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;72(2):233-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09r05072blu. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
  11. Bryant RA, Friedman MJ, Spiegel D, et al; A review of acute stress disorder in DSM-5. Depress Anxiety. 2011 Sep;28(9):802-17. doi: 10.1002/da.20737. Epub 2010 Nov 3.

Disclaimer: This article is for information only and should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions. EMIS has used all reasonable care in compiling the information but make no warranty as to its accuracy. Consult a doctor or other health care professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. For details see our conditions.

Original Author:
Dr Euan Lawson
Current Version:
Peer Reviewer:
Dr John Cox
Document ID:
28674 (v1)
Last Checked:
Next Review:

Did you find this health information useful?

Yes No

Thank you for your feedback!

Subcribe to the Patient newsletter for healthcare and news updates.

We would love to hear your feedback!

Patient Access app - find out more Patient facebook page - Like our page