Cauda Equina Syndrome

MarieAzzi84 rodion leanne83720 200 Users are discussing this topic

PatientPlus articles are written by UK doctors and are based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. They are designed for health professionals to use, so you may find the language more technical than the condition leaflets.

See also: Cauda Equina Syndrome written for patients

The cauda equina is formed by nerve roots caudal to the level of spinal cord termination. Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is caused by compression of the nerves, causing one or more of the following: bladder and/or bowel dysfunction, reduced sensation in the saddle (perineal) area, and sexual dysfunction, with possible neurological deficit in the lower limb (motor/sensory loss, reflex change).[1] 

CES is a medical emergency and requires immediate referral for investigation. Early diagnosis is essential. Early surgical decompression is crucial for a favourable outcome in most patients with CES.[2] 
  • The incidence is variable and dependent on aetiology. The prevalence is estimated to be between 1 and 3 per 100,00 population.
  • CES is reported in approximately 0.04% of all patients presenting with low back pain.
  • CES occurs in approximately 2% of cases of herniated lumbar discs.[4] 
  • A congenitally narrow spinal canal or acquired spinal stenosis arising from a combination of degenerative changes of the disc and the segmental posterior joints may predispose to CES.[5]

NEW - log your activity

  • Notes
    Add notes to any clinical page and create a reflective diary
  • Track
    Automatically track and log every page you have viewed
  • Print
    Print and export a summary to use in your appraisal
Click to find out more »
  • Herniation of a lumbar disc; the most common cause of CES is compression arising from large central lumbar disc herniation at the L4/L5 and L5/S1 level.[5]
  • Tumours: metastases, lymphomas, spinal tumours.
  • Trauma.
  • Infection, including epidural abscess.[6]
  • Congenital - eg, congenital spinal stenosis, kyphoscoliosis and spina bifida.
  • Spondylolisthesis.
  • Late-stage ankylosing spondylitis.
  • Postoperative haematoma.
  • Following spinal manipulation.[7]
  • Inferior vena cava thrombosis.
  • Sarcoidosis.

See also separate Examination of the Spine article.

Clinical diagnosis of CES is not easy.[5] Most cases are of sudden onset and progress rapidly within hours or days. However, CES can evolve slowly and patients do not always complain of pain. About 50-70% of patients have urinary retention on presentation; 30-50% have an incomplete syndrome.[10] 

  • Low back pain, with pain in the legs and unilateral or bilateral lower limb motor and/or sensory abnormality.
  • Lower limb motor weakness and sensory deficits: usually asymmetrical weakness with loss of reflexes dependent on the affected nerve root (increased lower limb reflexes and other upper motor neurone signs such as extensor plantar responses may indicate spinal cord involvement and exclude the diagnosis of CES). See also the separate Neurological Examination of the Lower Limbs article.
  • Bowel and/or bladder dysfunction with saddle and perineal anaesthesia.
  • Urinary dysfunction may include retention, difficulty starting or stopping a stream of urine, overflow incontinence and decreased bladder and urethral sensation.
  • Bowel disturbances may include faecal incontinence and constipation. Rectal examination may reveal loss of anal tone and sensation.
  • Sexual dysfunction.

Bilateral leg symptoms in the form of radicular pain, numbness or weakness are indicative of partial or impending CES if not part of the syndrome itself.[3] 

The diagnosis of CES is primarily based on a thorough history and clinical examination, assisted by appropriate radiological investigation.[2] The only way to exclude the diagnosis of CES is with an emergency MRI scan. About 40% of requested scans show no evidence of cauda equina compression.[11] 

  • Further investigations are focused on localising the site of compression and the underlying cause.
  • MRI scan is the preferred investigation to confirm the diagnosis and determine the level of the compression and any underlying cause.[5]
  • Myelography and CT are also sometimes used.
  • Urodynamic studies: may be required to monitor recovery of bladder function following decompression surgery.
  • Conus medullaris syndrome (the conus medullaris is located above the cauda equina at T12-L2; nerve root pain is less prominent and the main features are urinary retention and constipation).[12] 
  • Mechanical back pain or prolapsed lumbar disc.
  • Fracture of lumbar vertebrae due to trauma.
  • Spinal tumour.
  • Spinal cord compression.
  • Peripheral neuropathy.

Patients should be referred immediately for a neurosurgical consultation. Urgent surgical spinal decompression is indicated for most patients to prevent permanent neurological damage.[2] 

  • Immobilise the spine if CES is due to trauma.
  • Surgery is indicated to remove blood, bone fragments, tumour, herniated disc or abnormal bone growth.
  • Lesion debulking is required for space-occupying lesions - eg, tumours, abscess.
  • If surgery cannot be performed, radiotherapy may relieve cord compression caused by malignant disease.
  • Other treatment options may be useful in certain patients, depending on the underlying cause of the CES:
    • Anti-inflammatory agents, including steroids, can be effective in patients with inflammatory causes - eg, ankylosing spondylitis.
    • Infection causes should be treated with appropriate antibiotic therapy.
    • Patients with spinal neoplasms should be evaluated for chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
  • Postoperative care includes addressing lifestyle issues (eg, obesity), and also physiotherapy and occupational therapy, depending on residual lower limb dysfunction.

Complications are increasingly likely if diagnosis and appropriate management are delayed, and include residual:

  • Paralysis.
  • Sensory abnormalities.
  • Bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction.
  • Prognosis is dependent on the aetiology and the time taken before effective treatment is provided.
  • Inadequate or delayed diagnosis and effective treatment often lead to long-term bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction.
  • Late diagnosis and delay in treatment increase the risk of a permanent neurological deficit.
  • Patients with bilateral sciatica or complete perianal anaesthesia have a less favourable prognosis than patients with unilateral pain.

Further reading & references

  1. Fraser S, Roberts L, Murphy E; Cauda equina syndrome: a literature review of its definition and clinical presentation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov;90(11):1964-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.021.
  2. Ma B, Wu H, Jia LS, et al; Cauda equina syndrome: a review of clinical progress. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 May 20;122(10):1214-22.
  3. Mukherjee S, Thakur B, Crocker M; Cauda equina syndrome: a clinical review for the frontline clinician. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2013 Aug;74(8):460-4.
  4. Gitelman A, Hishmeh S, Morelli BN, et al; Cauda equina syndrome: a comprehensive review. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2008 Nov;37(11):556-62.
  5. Lavy C, James A, Wilson-MacDonald J, et al; Cauda equina syndrome. BMJ. 2009 Mar 31;338:b936. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b936.
  6. Lenehan B, Sullivan P, Street J, et al; Epidural abscess causing cauda equina syndrome. Ir J Med Sci. 2005 Jul-Sep;174(3):88-91.
  7. Oppenheim JS, Spitzer DE, Segal DH; Nonvascular complications following spinal manipulation. Spine J. 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):660-6; discussion 666-7.
  8. Sciatica (lumbar radiculopathy); NICE CKS, March 2015 (UK access only)
  9. Herndon CM, Zoberi KS, Gardner BJ; Common questions about chronic low back pain. Am Fam Physician. 2015 May 15;91(10):708-14.
  10. Gardner A, Gardner E, Morley T; Cauda equina syndrome: a review of the current clinical and medico-legal position. Eur Spine J. 2011 May;20(5):690-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1668-3. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
  11. Fairbank J, Mallen C; Cauda equina syndrome: implications for primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Feb;64(619):67-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X676988.
  12. Radcliff KE, Kepler CK, Delasotta LA, et al; Current management review of thoracolumbar cord syndromes. Spine J. 2011 Sep;11(9):884-92. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.07.022. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
  13. Todd NV; Causes and outcomes of cauda equina syndrome in medico-legal practice: a single neurosurgical experience of 40 consecutive cases. Br J Neurosurg. 2011 Aug;25(4):503-8. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2010.550344. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
  14. Tamburrelli FC, Genitiempo M, Bochicchio M, et al; Cauda equina syndrome: evaluation of the clinical outcome. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(7):1098-105.

Disclaimer: This article is for information only and should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions. EMIS has used all reasonable care in compiling the information but make no warranty as to its accuracy. Consult a doctor or other health care professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. For details see our conditions.

Original Author:
Dr Colin Tidy
Current Version:
Peer Reviewer:
Dr John Cox
Document ID:
1920 (v24)
Last Checked:
Next Review:

Did you find this health information useful?

Yes No

Thank you for your feedback!

Subcribe to the Patient newsletter for healthcare and news updates.

We would love to hear your feedback!

Patient Access app - find out more Patient facebook page - Like our page