Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

ryan77427 234 Users are discussing this topic

PatientPlus articles are written by UK doctors and are based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. They are designed for health professionals to use, so you may find the language more technical than the condition leaflets.

See also: Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia written for patients

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative disorder of pluripotent haemopoietic stem cells, affecting one or all cell lines (erythroid, platelet and myeloid). Over time, the leukaemic cells proliferate due to stepped-up production and failed apoptosis. More than 90% of cases of CML result from a cytogenetic aberration known as the Philadelphia chromosome. CML typically progresses through three stages:[1][2] 

Chronic phase

  • The immune system is competent and patients are asymptomatic for prolonged periods - typically, about 4-5 years.
  • More than 90% of patients are diagnosed in the initial chronic phase.[3] 

Accelerated phase

  • Defined by 15-29% blasts in blood or bone marrow, >20% basophils in blood, thrombocytosis, thrombocytopenia unrelated to therapy or clonal chromosome abnormalities in the Ph+ (Philadelphia chromosome) clone (CCA/Ph+).[3] 
  • In about two thirds of patients, the chronic phase transforms into an accelerated phase characterised by a moderate increase in blast cells, increasing anaemia or thrombocytopenia.
  • Features of the accelerated phase include progressive maturation arrest, increased bone marrow or peripheral blasts (15-30%), increased bone marrow or peripheral basophils and eosinophils (≥20%), resistance to therapy, increased constitutional symptoms, progressive splenomegaly, cytogenetic clonal evolution, leukocytosis and thrombocytosis or thrombocytopenia.

Blast crisis or blastic phase

  • After a variable amount of time (usually months) the accelerated phase progresses to acute blastic transformation. About a third of patients will move directly from the chronic phase of CML to blastic crisis.
  • The blastic phase or blast crisis is characterised by ≥30% blasts in blood or bone marrow or extramedullary blastic infiltration.
  • This is an aggressive acute leukaemia with marrow exhaustion, highly refractory to chemotherapy and usually rapidly fatal.
  • Features of blastic phase include bone marrow or peripheral blasts ≥30%, severe constitutional symptoms due to tumour burden (weight loss, fever, night sweats, bone pain), infection and bleeding and extramedullary blastic foci.
  • The annual incidence of CML is between 1 and 2 cases per 100,000.[3]
  • CML represents about 15% of all adult leukaemias.[1] 
  • Presentation can occur at any age; however, it is rare in children (CML represents only 5% of childhood leukaemia). The median age at diagnosis is 60-65 years.[3]

The initiating event or events are unknown: there are no known hereditary, familial, geographic, ethnic or economic associations. There may be an increased risk after exposure to the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki but not with lower levels of radiation.[4]

NEW - log your activity

  • Notes
    Add notes to any clinical page and create a reflective diary
  • Track
    Automatically track and log every page you have viewed
  • Print
    Print and export a summary to use in your appraisal
Click to find out more »
  • CML is characterised by a consistent cytogenetic abnormality - a reciprocal translocation between the long arms of chromosomes 22 and 9, t(9;22). The result is a shortened chromosome 22, known as the Ph chromosome.
  • The translocation is significant because it places an oncogene (abl) from the long arm of chromosome 9 to the long arm of chromosome 22 in the BCR region. The BCR-ABL fusion gene encodes a chimeric protein with strong tyrosine kinase activity. This constitutively active BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase causes CML but how the presence of this oncoprotein leads to the CML phenotype is not fully understood.
  • CML's hallmark is the presence of BCR-ABL rearrangement and is considered diagnostic when present in a patient with clinical manifestations of CML.

85-90% of patients are diagnosed in the chronic phase and in recent years about 40% of patients have been diagnosed before any symptoms developed, with incidental abnormalities spotted on a blood test.[1] 


Symptoms can be insidious in onset and include:

  • Fatigue.
  • Night sweats.
  • Weight loss.
  • Abdominal fullness or abdominal distension.
  • Left upper quadrant pain due to splenic infarction.


  • Splenomegaly - the most common physical finding, which may extend towards the right iliac fossa.
  • Hepatomegaly.
  • Enlarged lymph nodes are also a possibility.
  • Anaemia can produce a hyperdynamic circulation.
  • Easy bruising.
  • Fever.
  • Gout due to rapid cell turnover.
  • Hyperviscosity syndrome due to leukocytosis - visual disturbance (fundoscopy may show papilloedema, venous obstruction and retinal haemorrhages), priapism, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), confusion.

At presentation

  • FBC:
    • Leukocytosis is common.
    • Differential shows granulocytes at all stages of development and increased numbers of eosinophils and basophils.
    • Platelets may be elevated, decreased or normal levels.
    • A mild-to-moderate, usually normochromic and normocytic, anaemia is common.
  • Peripheral blood smear - all stages of maturation seen; often resembles a bone marrow aspiration.
  • Biochemistry - U&Es are usually normal at presentation, lactate dehydrogenase is usually raised, serum urate may be raised.
  • Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy are essential to quantify the percentage of blasts and basophils, to assess the degree of fibrosis and to obtain material for cytogenetic-molecular analyses.
  • The leukocyte alkaline phosphatase test is largely of historical interest, as it has been superseded by cytogenetic tests; however, it was used previously to differentiate CML from other myeloproliferative disorders.
  • Cytogenetics - the characteristic feature in CML is the Ph chromosome, found in about 90% of cases. Of those with a negative Ph chromosome, a third to one half test positive for the abnormal gene, or the abnormal protein associated with the chromosome, when more sensitive studies, such as dual fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR), are used. They have a similar prognosis and response to treatment as patients with classical Ph CML.
  • HLA typing for patients and family members if stem cell transplantation (SCT) is contemplated.

During treatment

  • Cytogenetic response is monitored by regular karyotyping or FISH studies looking at the percentage of bone marrow cells with Ph+ cells.
  • Molecular response is monitored by looking at PCR studies demonstrating BCR-ABL transcript levels. Rising levels can indicate loss of response to treatment.[5]
  • BCR-ABL mutation analysis to determine likely susceptibility to treatment.

Frequency of monitoring will depend upon local protocols.

The Ph chromosome is diagnostic but, where it is negative, consider:

Goals of treatment are:

  • Haematologic remission (normal FBC count, physical examination, ie no organomegaly).
  • Cytogenetic remission (normal chromosome returns with 0% Ph-positive cells).
  • Molecular remission (negative PCR result for the mutational BCR-ABL m-RNA).

Drug treatment is superior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in first-line therapy of CML, because of transplant-related mortality.[6]

Drug therapies

In recent years, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have come to dominate the treatment of CML. In the past, myelosuppressive drug treatment has included busulfan and hydroxyurea. Interferon alfa provides better results than traditional chemotherapy, associated with improved survival.


  • Imatinib:
    • Imatinib was one of the first drugs designed on an understanding of a disease's molecular biology. It is a selective inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase encoded by BCR-ABL fusion gene; it inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in cells positive for BCR-ABL and Ph+ leukaemic clones. Imatinib is now firmly established as an effective therapy for newly diagnosed patients with CML.[7][8] 
    • Rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) among patients receiving imatinib were 69% by 12 months and 87% by 60 months. These patients had a significantly lower risk of disease progression. Only 7% of patients progressed to accelerated phase CML or blast crisis over five years and the estimated overall survival of patients who received imatinib as initial therapy was 89% at the same time period.[9] 
    • It has very quickly become standard therapy for CML because of its remarkable efficacy and mild side-effect profile.[9] 
  • Second- and third-generation TKIs:
    • Imatinib seems particularly effective in chronic phase CML. In more advanced disease, patients are less likely to be sensitive and often display a short-lived response to the drug. Failure of imatinib therapy associated with progression in the accelerated or blastic phase carries a particularly poor prognosis.[10] 
    • Primary and secondary drug resistance at all stages of the disease has been observed. The underlying mechanisms of drug resistance are beginning to be understood and second-generation drugs such as nilotinib (a more potent BCR-ABL inhibitor) and dasatinib (a dual ABL/SRC inhibitor) have been developed.[11][12] Trials have shown that these drugs are effective in patients previously exposed to imatinib.[13][14] 
    • Third-generation TKIs are being developed to target further mutations associated with drug resistance, and combination therapy may be a strategy to pre-empt resistance.[15] 

For first-line treatment of CML, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends the following:[16]

  • Standard-dose imatinib is recommended as an option for the first-line treatment of adults with chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML.
  • Nilotinib is recommended as an option for the first-line treatment of adults with chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML if the manufacturer makes nilotinib available with the discount agreed as part of the patient access scheme.
  • Dasatinib is not recommended for the first-line treatment of chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML.

Imatinib is also recommended as an option for the treatment of people with Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML who initially present in the accelerated phase or with blast crisis, and as an option for people who present in the chronic phase and then progress to the accelerated phase or blast crisis if they have not received imatinib previously.[17]

For CML resistant to standard-dose imatinib, NICE currently recommends the following:[18]

  • Nilotinib is recommended for the treatment of chronic or accelerated phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML in adults: whose CML is resistant to treatment with standard-dose imatinib or who have imatinib intolerance and if the manufacturer makes nilotinib available with the discount agreed as part of the patient access scheme.
  • Dasatinib is not recommended for the treatment of chronic, accelerated or blast crisis phase CML in adults with imatinib intolerance or whose CML is resistant to treatment with standard-dose imatinib.
  • High-dose imatinib is not recommended for the treatment of chronic, accelerated or blast crisis phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML that is resistant to standard-dose imatinib.

Transplant therapies[19]

CML has been the most common indication for a bone marrow transplant but the place of SCTs in the treatment of CML post-imatinib is debated. It remains an important option, particularly for younger individuals with HLA-identical siblings with the hope of cure. Risks of SCT include:

  • Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).
  • Veno-occlusive disease.
  • Life-threatening infections.
  • Risk of secondary malignancies.
  • Poorer overall quality of life.

AlloSCT should ideally be undertaken in the chronic phase of CML when it is associated with 3- to 5-year survival rates of 40-80% and 10-year survival rates of 30-60%. The optimal time of transplantation is controversial but thought to be up to 24 months following diagnosis. Transplantation-related mortality ranges from 5-50% depending on factors including the patient's age, donor origin (related vs unrelated), degree of HLA matching, host cytomegalovirus status, use of conditioning regimens and institutional expertise.

Only about a third to a half of all patients may have a suitable HLA-matched sibling. Options for these individuals include the use of matched unrelated donors (MUDs) or autologous SCT. The use of stringent molecular typing in finding MUDs decreases the risk of GVHD but reduces availability.

In autologous SCT, cells from the patient's own bone marrow are withdrawn before destroying the bone marrow with chemotherapy or radiation. The transplant cells are then infused and repopulate the bone marrow. There is a risk that the transplanted stem cells may still contain the Ph chromosome. A recent meta-analysis suggested that it conferred no survival benefit and should be avoided as initial treatment for CML.[20] It may still have a role in instances such as drug-resistant CML.

Prognosis for long-term survival with CML has improved over the years:

  • The median survival rates with hydroxyurea therapy were 4-5 years. With interferon therapy used alone or in combination with cytarabine (Ara-C), these numbers are almost doubled.
  • The introduction of imatinib has greatly improved the prognoses for CML patients:[21] 
    • There is a higher rate of major cytogenetic remission (MCR) achieved with imatinib compared with interferon (85% vs 7-37%).[22] The hope is that this will translate into survival benefit - as it does with interferon.
    • Estimates, based on this premise, suggest an absolute increment in the 10-year survival rate of about a third.[23]
    • Observational studies are still in progress so evidence for long-term (10 years and beyond) survival benefit of this new drug is not available yet.
    • Follow-up at five years suggests an enduring response to imatinib in a high proportion of patients and an overall five-year survival rate of 89%.[9]

Further reading & references

  1. Granatowicz A, Piatek CI, Moschiano E, et al; An Overview and Update of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia for Primary Care Physicians. Korean J Fam Med. 2015 Sep;36(5):197-202. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2015.36.5.197. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
  2. Deininger MW; Diagnosing and managing advanced chronic myeloid leukemia. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015:e381-8. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2015.35.e381.
  3. Chronic myeloid leukaemia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up; European Society for Medical Oncology (2010)
  4. Advisory Group on Ionising Radiation (AGIR); Public Health England
  5. Jabbour E, Cortes JE, Kantarjian HM; Molecular monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia: response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and prognostic implications. Cancer. 2008 May 15;112(10):2112-8.
  6. Leukemia, Chronic Myeloid, CML; Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)
  7. Eiring AM, Khorashad JS, Morley K, et al; Advances in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. BMC Med. 2011 Aug 26;9:99.
  8. Hehlmann R, Hochhaus A, Baccarani M; Chronic myeloid leukaemia. Lancet. 2007 Jul 28;370(9584):342-50.
  9. Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG, et al; Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 7;355(23):2408-17.
  10. Kantarjian H, O'Brien S, Talpaz M, et al; Outcome of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia post-imatinib mesylate failure. Cancer. 2007 Apr 15;109(8):1556-60.
  11. Kantarjian HM, Talpaz M, Giles F, et al; New insights into the pathophysiology of chronic myeloid leukemia and imatinib resistance. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Dec 19;145(12):913-23.
  12. Quintas-Cardama A, Cortes JE; Chronic myeloid leukemia: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Jul;81(7):973-88.
  13. Ramirez P, DiPersio JF; Therapy options in imatinib failures. Oncologist. 2008 Apr;13(4):424-34.
  14. Radich JP; Chronic myeloid leukemia 2010: where are we now and where can we go? Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2010;2010:122-8.
  15. O'Hare T, Eide CA, Deininger MW; New Bcr-Abl inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: keeping resistance in check. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008 Jun;17(6):865-78.
  16. Dasatinib, nilotinib and standard-dose imatinib for the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia; NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance, April 2012
  17. Guidance on the use of imatinib for chronic myeloid leukaemia; NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance, October 2003
  18. Dasatinib, high-dose imatinib and nilotinib for the treatment of imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) (part review of NICE technology appraisal guidance 70), and dasatinib and nilotinib for people with CML for whom treatment with imatinib has failed because of intolerance; NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance, January 2012
  19. Garcia-Manero G, Faderl S, O'Brien S, et al; Chronic myelogenous leukemia: a review and update of therapeutic strategies. Cancer. 2003 Aug 1;98(3):437-57.
  20. No authors listed; Autologous stem cell transplantation in chronic myeloid leukaemia: a meta-analysis of six randomized trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007 Feb;33(1):39-47. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
  21. Fava C, Rege-Cambrin G, Saglio G; The choice of first-line chronic myelogenous leukemia treatment. Ann Hematol. 2015 Apr;94 Suppl 2:S123-31. doi: 10.1007/s00277-015-2321-3. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
  22. O'Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, et al; Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 13;348(11):994-1004.
  23. Hasford J, Pfirrmann M, Hochhaus A; How long will chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib mesylate live? Leukemia. 2005 Apr;19(4):497-9.

Disclaimer: This article is for information only and should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions. EMIS has used all reasonable care in compiling the information but make no warranty as to its accuracy. Consult a doctor or other health care professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. For details see our conditions.

Original Author:
Dr Chloe Borton
Current Version:
Peer Reviewer:
Dr John Cox
Document ID:
1958 (v25)
Last Checked:
Next Review:

Did you find this health information useful?

Yes No

Thank you for your feedback!

Subcribe to the Patient newsletter for healthcare and news updates.

We would love to hear your feedback!

Patient Access app - find out more Patient facebook page - Like our page