Green Light treatment for BPH.
Posted , 13 users are following.
Has anyone had this treatment and what was your experience with this treatment? Iam a new member.
0 likes, 32 replies
Posted , 13 users are following.
Has anyone had this treatment and what was your experience with this treatment? Iam a new member.
0 likes, 32 replies
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
Geezer kirk43
Posted
kirk43 Geezer
Posted
glenn77 kirk43
Posted
I did and the outcome was not good. I suspect that my doctor was not really qualified to perform the procedure.
Make sure that you doctor does a lot of GL procedures. Ask him how many he does in a year. Ask what the worst outcome he's had, and ask if any patients had permanent incontinence or impotence afterwards.
kirk43 glenn77
Posted
glenn77 kirk43
Posted
I assume that GL can have a good outcome when performed by a doctor who is properly trained, and who does a lot of the procedure. It was just a great disaster for me. I do know that the way it works depends on the Green Laser light interacting with red blood cells to cause the heating that destroys prostate material. If there is no red blood, it doesn't work. I do know that my current urologist, who is also a professor who teaches at an excellent medical center, told me that he had been trained to do GL, had done it himself, and had taught the procedure to medical students. He said he no longer does GL or teaches it, because of some inherent problems, and because there are better procedures available.
Glenn
kirk43 glenn77
Posted
dennis47445 kirk43
Posted
Kirk, I had it done around 13 or 14 years ago. I had a very large prostate, 141 grams. The greenlight, is not effective for that size prostate. I think the holep, would be for very large prostate. Anyway, no pain, easy surgery for me. After the surgery, went home with a catheter. The next day they took it off and I could urinate easily. The thing with me, was that once I was off the medication {doxazosin} my urination wasn't that good. I still needed to take medication so I could urinate with a decent stream. After two years or around there, I had to go in for surgery again to fix the problem. The prostate, continues to grow even after surgery. So far I've had three surgeries. One Greenlight, and two TURPs. My suggestion to you is to not do any of those, but to self catheter. I am doing self catheterizing now, and it's the best. Better than all of my surgeries. To be objective, there are others, that are very happy with their choice to do TURP.
breeze61 kirk43
Posted
Hi Kirk,
I had a HoLEp on 14th April this year and it has been a resounding success. I'm 69 and wasn't worried about RE because of my age and I had had RE for a couple of years because of the pills I was taking. I was completely free of all the BHP problems after about 10 weeks and had only a problem with urgency from about weeks 5 to 8. I found a good hospital and consultant here in UK which is key for a good outcome. my prostate was some 70 grammes and I've found out that 35 grammes was taken away. I now am peeing strong, about 300 mlitres in 10 secs, have no retention and can sleep 7 hours without needing a pee.At about 6 weeks, much to my surprise I was producing semen and ejeculating and am continuing to do so. Not much volume but I expect it to improve over time and my orgasms are better than theyve been for years.
If you are younger or want to guarantee not losing your ability to ejeculate then, try some of the other techniques but with Holpep and green laser you are guaranteed a lot of years of being non BHP.
kirk43 breeze61
Posted
kirk43
Posted
breeze61 kirk43
Posted
Hi Kirk,
I agree that one should not want to endure ED at any age, but I was so desperate after the last year of getting up 5 to 7 times a night I would have sold my granny for relief whether with ED or not.
It's always a big decision and risk when subjecting oneself to an operation and I'm very grateful that my op worked out very well. I had no pain or much blood in urine and no clots. I was A1, 2 days after the op but did suffer urgency for 3 weeks but that cleared up . I did a pass on my first consultant who was fobbing me off and I did not want to trust him. I then found out about a hospital with a good reputation and as soon as I met the new consultant, I felt confident with him. Good luck with whatever choice you make.
Lou1110 kirk43
Posted
The operation lasted 1:30 and a catheter was placed as i stayed overnight at the hospital. The next morning they took the catheter out and asked me to try to uirnate. For the first time in three months i was able to urinate! The doctor suggested that I limit my activity to walking and no stressful exercise. Of course I didn’t listen and exercised a bit too agressive after the third week and there wa blood in my urine, I have been uirinating very well since. My doctor suggested that i keep drinking lots of liquids (not alcohol!) to keep the bladder and urinari track clean.
I am very happy with the results. If you have more specific questions i would be happy to share my experience with answers.
Lou1110 montreal
kirk43 Lou1110
Posted
kirk43
Posted
keith42667 kirk43
Posted
Just to be clear, at least here in the U.S. using an "in-dwelling" catheter is not the only choice we have. THere are many types and brands of single-use disposable catheters. Once one learns how to do this (very short and simple learning curve for me) it is like JJ says, like brushing one's teeth; takes about that long. I suppose you could argue that people don't normally brush their teeth 4 times a day but the relief and health advantages of completely draining the bladder is worth the extra time to me. I had some bleeding at first and a little irritation to my urethra but evidently it "toughened up" because I don't get any of that now. Originally, my local doctor's office gave me the only catheter they had on hand, a red rubber one that was, I'd guess, about an FR18 or something. It caused bleeding and I got out some relatively large blood clots that I guess were in the bottom of my bladder. Once I got some samples from a medical supplier and found that intermittant catheter that worked well for me I have had no problems with that part of this ordeal. I try to do a natural void each time before I catheterize. I've been using the Crede maneuver lately because I usually cannot get the flow going unless I'm retaining over 350 or 400 ml and I don't like to let it get that high. I'm just taking it a day at a time.
I have a medigap insurance policy that pays for the catheters after the yearly co-pay is satisfied as they fall under Part B medicare which I would probably pay on other things anyway. So I'm happy plus there is the added bonus that I do believe that my bladder is re-training to some extent. I have been doing CIC for about 14 months now and some of the urges of needing to empty are coming back at a lower retention level; probably about 325 ml as opposed to 400 ml.