Happy with my TURP
Posted , 9 users are following.
I am a 66 year old white guy in Houston, Texas. I have had BPH issues as long as I can remember. However, about a year ago, it got to the point that sometimes at night I wasn't sure I would even be able to pee at all. I was in constant fear of sooner or later having to go to the ER to be catherized.
?I was hoping to have the Urolift procedure as it claims to have good long lasting results with no diminished sexual issues. However, my BPH was primarily an enlarged middle lobe which ruled out the Urolift procedure. The reason being the colon is directly behind the middle lobe, so there is a risk of puncturing the colon with the Urolift stables.
?I was primarily looking for good long lasting results. The TURP procedure is the gold standard and at this point in my life, the expected loss of some sexual satisfaction was secondary to good urinary function.
?I had the procedure done in early January. Two months later, I can report I am able to urinate easily and forcefully. The stream starts easily and doesn't quit until my bladder is empty. I also can hold it longer without discomfort or urgency and I don't have to get up at night nearly as often. And surprisingly, I don't seem to have retrograde ejaculation. I've had no problems with getting an erection (never did) and while the orgasm isn't quite as toe curling as before, it is still quite acceptable.
All in all, it was a very positive experience for me.
2 likes, 17 replies
ian57943 jim1494
Posted
Hi Jim, thanks for sharing such a positive experience. I am in a limbo at present having a catheter insert 3 times in A&E (ER), as a side effect of a template biopsy that has swollen my very large (>100cc) prostrate. I am scheduled for HoLEP sometime but am investigating the PAE option.
Ian
jim1494 ian57943
Posted
gbhall ian57943
Posted
Laser options tend to be prone to spray high energy around with less than ideal control, standard TURP is bloody and has a long recovery with sexual side effects. Pinning the lobes back does nothing to stop the prostate carrying on growing, and is unsuitable with a central lobe, or even an exceptionally large prostate.
By and large, a Turp suits best, especially the latest, highly controllable
versions such as bi-polar, button-, ejaculation-preserving, and whatever else their is coming soon.
oldbuzzard jim1494
Posted
I'm glad that you had such a positive experience...but am saddened that in Houston that a urologist is still recommending and doing TURP as a first line treatment for BPH. Most people end up with RE, many with reduced or no sexual function and the recovery can be long - and then there is the standard risk of anesthesia. Chances are Rezum would have given you the same benefits with a quicker recovery and much less risk.
Your outcome was ideal and I'm really happy for you - but my guess is that fewer than 5% of TURP surgeries end up this well.
jim1494 oldbuzzard
Posted
It was actually my decision to go with TURP. My uro does many procedures and we did discuss those, but from what I'd read TURP had the best long term results. Yes, I consider myself fortunate with the outcome.
gbhall oldbuzzard
Posted
Nobody over 65 or so should have a general anaesthetic for anything below the waist.
I'm 73 and opted for spinal which was not very painful, even though they took 10 minutes to find a place to get through....I also asked for twightlight sedation expecting to be able to watch or chat, but actually remember nothing.
One other thing about a spinal over full anaesthesia is when you are in recovery you still feel nothing for quite a while, but with a full one the post operative pain starts right away - or so I am told.
kenneth1955 jim1494
Posted
jim1494 kenneth1955
Posted
My urologist also does Urolift and has had good results with it. He said to try Urolift ... neither he nor I would be happy with the results. I had read that some urologists do the Urolift on the middle lobe but we weren't willing to take the risk. Glad to know it can be done.
kenneth1955 jim1494
Posted
How would you know if you would have been happy with it. It could have done the job. I'm glad the the turp did good for you but it could have gone the other way. You have men on here that have had turps and they are still leaking and have to wear pads. You were lucky Take care Ken
rick47445 jim1494
Posted
jim1494 rick47445
Posted
joe78408 jim1494
Posted
Jim,
I too had TURP 11/08/16 and had great results. Glad to hear that your experience with turp. I know there are many other options. I am so glad I went with TURP. I'm 70 yrs old, sleep through the night and sex is wonderful again. What more can a guy ask for. I'm in Cleburne Tx. about 300 miles north of you.
jim1494 joe78408
Posted
frank74205 jim1494
Posted
Thanks for reply.
frank
kenneth1955 frank74205
Posted
Frank Please don't. You know that everyone heal different. Your doing ok with CIC why ask for trouble. Ken PS Them are not good odd
oldbuzzard frank74205
Posted
Hi Frank,
TURP should be a last resort. Please look into all of the less invasive procedures before considering it. And make sure you have a thorough diagnosis before having anything done. "You can't pee so you should have a procedure" is the wrong answer - particularly if that procedure is TURP. Yes, some, even many do well, but there are less invasive procedures, with faster recovery, no anesthesia and fewer side effects to try that will probably help - IF you are properly diagnosed with BPH
jim1494 frank74205
Posted