IOL explanation
Posted , 10 users are following.
Has anyone had a IOL explantation?
0 likes, 24 replies
Posted , 10 users are following.
Has anyone had a IOL explantation?
0 likes, 24 replies
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
ad12345 lani14140
Posted
Generally the are very few people who had IOL exchange, so it would be hard to find one here.
billy111 lani14140
Posted
They are not to be done lightly. You better have a very skilled, very EXPERIENCED cataract surgeon to do it if you must have it done.
rap109 lani14140
Posted
I was about to ask the same question, although I am terrified of the thought of going thru another eye surgery. My Panoptix lens have yet to provide me with even "good" results in my opinion and it's been six months.
soks rap109
Posted
whats the problem?
rap109 soks
Posted
My vision is not clear at any distance, although just a few days ago I was told I had 20/20 vision. The letters, although readable, were not clear. Google - "PanOptix shadows around text" -
Spoo rap109
Posted
Shadows are likely caused by the fact that you have 3 different distances shown to your eyeball at the same time. IOL optics are fixed so this is a feature of a multifocal lens, any multifocal not just panoptix. So you have the "optimal" vision in focus, and then the suboptimal versions are shown around the best focus version and appear as ghosting. Either your brain learns how to filter these out or not.
neverquit Spoo
Posted
Yes, i always had the impression to see all three focus of each letter simultaniously, just at marginally different positions, with my trifocal Panoptix. Like, one letter and two ghosts besides it. Especially with white letters on black background when using computer or phone.
It made small text unreadable, as letters were overlapping each other in a mess, when small letters are close to each other to begin with. I doubt to ever have gotten used to this, so i went for explantation after over 10 month since surgery.
Everybody tells you to wait if you get used to it, while at the same time the window for explantation is slowly closing more and more. A tricky situation, which eventually requires a tough decission into either direction.
lani14140 neverquit
Posted
How have you been since your lens change?
And what type did you exchange to?
is it easier if you dont wait too long?
amy99928 rap109
Posted
MY vision is "great" and "20/20" but EXACTLY same here readable letters but not clear, shadows around text over a month after Vivity implant. Also halos around lights and a little duplicate shadow around like lines in road.
RonAKA lani14140
Posted
This article is somewhat dated, but may still be helpful in understanding the issues around explantation.
.
American Academy of Ophthalmology When Lenses Go Wrong: Tips on IOL Explantation By Lori Baker Schena
billy111 lani14140
Posted
You may want to read this article dated Nov 2021
Google "Healio ophthalmology iol exchange patient expectations"
neverquit lani14140
Posted
Two years ago, i got Panoptix in both eyes, and hated them. Explanted them after 10 month in exchange for Vivity (in a -0.5D monovision setup), and applying "reverse optic capture" technique, because since the first surgery i had negative dysphotopsia (black arcs on the side of field) in both eyes, in addition to the expected, but unusual severe positive dysphotopsia.
The last 2 years were the worst of my life. After first surgery i also developed PVD, resulting in extreme floater-clouds. Just now am i finally seeing the end of the tunnel, as i´m having "floaterectomy" done as well, right now, successfully on one eye two weeks ago, and the second eye in one week.
I traveled literally around the world, to finally find the great surgeon, who was able to get me out of my misery.
Now i see great at all distances with Vivity, the left "near eye" reaching down to ~35 cm distance from face, and only need glasses for the absolute tiniest of print, so basically free of glasses.
The Panoptix have been great at very close up vision, compared to Vivity, but i just couldn´t stand the dysphotopsias when driving at night, and unable to read small white letters on black background on the computer and phone (which was the dealbreaker for me).
Of course, outcomes are different for everybody, but multifocals are a gamble.
So, one more "floaterectomy" for me, next week. Then i´m hopefully done with my awfull odyssey, to go on with my life.
ad12345 neverquit
Posted
Who did your exchange?
neverquit ad12345
Posted
A widely respected ophthalmic surgeon in Vienna, Austria.
Not cheap, but lots of experience with complicated cases.
I just signed up to this forum recently, so i don´t know if i´m allowed to post links here. I´ll send you a PM.
Lynda111 neverquit
Posted
Was is Dr Oliver Findl?
soks neverquit
Posted
can you please PM me the doctor name?
also what is floaterectomy?
and why did you get ND with panoptix but not with vivity?
neverquit Lynda111
Posted
Yes, Dr Oliver Findl. Look up his website, it´s in german and english.
I liked how he was not promising unrealistic expectations, but then delivering maximum professional work.
He is expensive, but i would rather choose to be broke, than compromising on my eyesight for the rest of my life.
neverquit soks
Edited
About "ND":
My first surgery in an other country with Panoptix was done in the regular fashion, like all cataract surgeries are usually done: lens and haptics inside the capsular bag.
But at the second surgery with Dr. Findl in Austria, he placed the lens just in front of the capsular bag opening, but keeping the haptics inside the bag. This seems to prevent the edge of the lens casting this shadow on the side/back of the eyes, resulting in seeing these typical black arcs on the side of the viewing field.
So it has nothing to do with Panoptix or Vivity (they are similar sized lenses, though some lens-types are more prone to this), but it is just a different, rather simple technique implanting IOLs.
It´s called "Reverse Optic Capture", and i could have done this for the Panoptix easily as well, in a follow up surgery.
For most people ND goes away after some month or even a year, but didn´t for me. So he applied the technique right away, when inserting the new Vivity.
ND has mostly to do with your personal anatomy of your eyes, and surgeons just can´t know prior to the cataract surgery, if it will affect you.
But it can be easily corrected afterwards, by applying ROC in a simple additional surgery, where the surgeon just lifts the edge of the lens to the front of the edge of the bag opening. And it stays there, because the bag-hole is slightly smaller than the diameter of the lens (6mm). The haptics just stay inside the bag.
Well, it resolves ND in most cases.
Btw, what was really, really helpfull for my explantation, was the fact, that i held off doing the YAG-laser follow up, when having the Panoptix. An intakt capsular bag really helps, when doing an explantation, so don´t let your doctor talk you into doing YAG quickly, before you´re absolutely sure to keep your current IOLs ! !
About "Floaterectomy":
It´s a vitrectomy, solely for the removal of huge floaters, when you can´t get rid of them by laser (laser just brakes floaters up into many small fragments, but not removing them).
Vitrectomy was always considered as highly risky in the past, but with new techniques, i.e. microincisions and an experienced surgeon, risks have come down considerably.
BUT it is riskier for young people, who didn´t have natural PVD yet, which increases the risk of retinal tear during vitrectomy surgery. So it is very important to choose a surgeon specialized in retinal repair, just in case he has to do that right away as well, during the surgery.
AND vitrectomy increases the probability of getting natural cataracts afterwards dramatically.
But as i´m older and having had both (PVD and cataract surgery) already, it was quite easy for me. Well, one eye two weeks ago. The second eye coming up in 10 days. Knock on wood.
All in all, it seems that i´m nearing a happy end to my 2 year eye-odyssey. But it feels like, you know, when you are on the road, and a truck nearly misses you by a few centimeters at 150 kmh. Lots of adrenalin, and nearly unable to comprehend how close you were to disaster 😃
I hope to have cleared up most questions about "ND" and "Floaterectomy", which are surely plaguing many of us in similar situations, because what was most nerve wrecking for me, was the uncertainty in my mind about all this.
soks neverquit
Posted
thanks for sharing that reverse optic capture fixed your ND. do they just remove the floating fragments in floaterectomy and not the vitreous?
also please pm me the surgeon name. thanks!!
neverquit soks
Posted
"soks", i mentioned the surgeons name in above posts twice.
It´s Prim. Univ. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl in Vienna, Austria.
Just google him, his website is in german and english language.
About the "floaterectomy":
They remove the central part of the vitreous completely, and since the floaters are swimming in the vitreous, the floaters are then gone with it together.
Then the resulting empty space gets filled up with a simple saline solution, which gets replaced by natural vitreous from your body slowly automatically, in a timeframe of just a month or two, without you noticing this process.
There is no requirement for any awkward head positioning after the floaterectomy. Not much pain, just local anesthesia, the eye will be a little swollen, and you have to apply various drops for a month. Feels just like a regular cataract surgery. IF everything goes well.
B U T, it´s a whole other story, when having complications, like an infection, or a retinal tear, during surgery. If the surgeon has to repair a retinal tear as well, he puts an additional gas bubble into the eye, which then requires positioning your head face down, for the next days or a week, so the bubble presses up to the repaired spot on the retina, until it heals in place.
The gas bubble then dissolves automatically in the coming weeks. Not much fun, when being in that situation.
Thats why i suggested to definitely choose an experienced retinal specialist, just in case, if complications arise during surgery.
A vitrectomy should still NOT be taken lightly, and carefully thought about ! !
As i said, the possible risks depend on your initial eye-situation to begin with.
Complications can still arise even after vitrectomy for a month or so. Thats why i rented an apartment over "airbnb" in beautiful Austria and will stay here for another month, so i won´t end up with complications, when having returned to my home country, being far away from Dr. Findl . . .
RonAKA soks
Posted
Some more information can be found here.
.
APR 04, 2018 Reverse optic capture successfully eliminates negative dysphotopsia By Lisa B Arbisser MD
soks RonAKA
Posted
i dont have ND. it might be a function of small pupil so i have quite the opposite.
soks Lynda111
Posted
Lynda111 how did you know the name.
Lynda111 soks
Posted
I just Google searched and made an educated guess. Germany and Austria do have some of the world's leading ophthalmologists.