Lens Exchange After Cataract Surgery - Has anyone had one?

Posted , 6 users are following.

Has anyone had cataract surgery and later had the lens taken out and had another one put in in its place?  I have the Symfony lens in one eye and I have HUGE starbursts.  I want to have it taken out and replaced with a monofocal lens.  My eye Dr. says an exchange is risky.

 

0 likes, 21 replies

21 Replies

  • Posted

    I think that if your main night vision issue is starbursts, then replacing the Symfony lens with a monofocal lens is probably not a good choice. This is because while the multiple (about 9-10) circles or halos around lights are a distinct characteristic of a Symfony lens, the starbursts are due to other reasons and can happen with any type of lens.
    • Posted

      Thank you.   Do you know what causes starbursts if not the lens?  In my monofocal eye I have small starbursts but not bad compared to the Symfony.  
    • Posted

      According to an article on the subject by Daniel H. Chang, MD:

      "...glare and starbursts generally result from posterior capsular opacification (PCO), refractive error (eg, astigmatism), optical aberrations, and/or problems with the tear film or ocular surface. Halos are typically related to multifocal IOLs." or the Extended Focus Lens, Symfony.

    • Posted

      Thank you!!!   The starbursts and glare in my Symfony eye are huge, I mean huge!   I have some in my monofocal eye ( surgery approx one week ago)  but they are very small.    I do have more astigmatism in my Symfony eye  but they used a toric lens in it.    It would be disappointing to have the Symfony lens exchanged for a monofocal and still have the huge starbursts and glare!
    • Posted

      Hi j89867 - has the surgeon checked to see if your Symfony toric lens rotated?  If the astigmatism wasn’t corrected with a toric lens it could be due to rotation of IOL.  You could have it rotated back (if it’s not been to long since your surgery) or better (safer) would be to have a lasik enhancement.  
    • Posted

      All toric lenses can rotate from the installed position. My Symfony toric lens also had rotated about 20 deg from the installed position, which resulted in astigmatism. It was easy for the surgeon to check for that during the eye examination. He gave me a choice of getting the lens rotated back in position or getting LASIK enhancement done to correct the problem. Both of those were free for me (may not be true for everyone) and I opted for LASIK enhancement to correct the astigmatism and any spherical prescription error.

      While my eye has improved to 20/15 after the LASIK enhancement, there was a period when the vision was not clear as I like. The solution to that turned out to be making sure that my eyes are not dried, even if I don't feel any irritation due to the eye dryness.

      The main message is that leaving aside the night vision issues for the moment, you should have a good check-up to see how good your day vision with that eye is. Knowing those results will help your doctor and you understand better the best way to improve your night vision.

  • Posted

    My  day vision is very good with my right eye, which has the Symfony lens.    My doctor says the lens is in the perfect place and not rotated.  It’s only at night  where I have the issue with glare and starbursts.  
    • Posted

      It is great that your day vision is very good.

      However, that makes it harder to figure out the reason for the night vision issues of glare and starbursts.

      What does the doctor say about the reason?

      One other thought. Even though your toric lens has not rotated, that does not necessarily mean that you may not have some leftover astigmatism  or  spherical prescription error. Correcting that for night driving with glasses may improve the night vision enough to be a little less bothersome.

  • Posted

    I will be having a lens exchange as soon as I stabilize.( waiting 6 weeks for no light sensitivity/pain flare ups)  I had previous lasik procedure @ 20 years ago and the calculations during operation were way off and the wrong power was installed. The thing that bothers me is even during the check up at dr office, where I’m being dialed in for the new lens power (“ is one better than two “part)I’m still not able to see crystal clear. The dr says my astigmatism is at zero. So the question is, when we replace the wrong power with the correct power things will be less blurry but what’s next? More lasik? What’s the difference between lasik and PRK? Anyone have experience with this procedure and what were your results? 
    • Posted

      Even though, your vision was not crystal clear even after dialing the various lens power, do you know:

      1. What lens power gave you the best vision? Since the doctor said that the astigmatism is zero, this is probably just the spherical correction.

      2. Even though it was not crystal clear even with the best correction, what were you able to read with it? 20/25, 20/30?

      3. Did the doctor suggest at all the reason for your not getting a clear vision with the best lens prescription?

      As I said before, it is important to know the reason for the unclear vision before you take the next step, specially if the next step is to get the lens replaced.

      If I had to guess, my feeling is that:

      1. A wrong power lens was installed in your eye. The easiest way to correct the power is not to do the lens exchange, but to have LASIK (or PRK) to correct the power. I have had LASIK enhancement in both of my eyes and have been very pleased with the results. LASIK and PRK should give similar results, but the eye recovery from LASIK is much faster. PRK is better for persons who are engaged in contact sports or similar activities, which may jar the cornea flap.

      2. You probably have dry eyes without any discomfort symptoms. No one's cornea is perfect. It is a good tear film on the cornea, which smooths out the cornea surface to provide the best vision. For me, if my eyes are dry, the best-corrected vision can change from 20/15 to 20/25..

    • Posted

      I have temporary readers for the time being. 1.75 in left 2.0 in right. I didn’t think lasik or PRK could correct that much of a difference. 

      Dr is being very vague about what the cause is. I have my second opinion tomorrow and hopefully will get more information .

      Eye drops have been recommended but I’m not sure dry eye is the problem as I do not see a difference in vision with or without after a few days use. 

    • Posted

      Am I understanding you right that you are using readers of 1.75D in left and 2.0D in right for seeing well in the distance?

      In any case, I think that you need to see a good LASIK surgeon to evaluate your eye to see if that is a good solution for you. Many of the good LASIK surgeons provide free consultation.

      While everyone is different, here is a general statement from one of the web sites,which indicates that the +2D correction needed for your eye does not rule out the LASIK (or other similar procedures) for you :

      For "Mild and Moderate Cases of Farsightedness (+2 Diopters to +5 Diopters).

      Laser vision surgery procedures like LASIK, PRK, LASEK, and EpiLasik are capable of correcting only up to about + 5 Diopters of farsightedness (Hyperopia)."

    • Posted

      I’m using readers for reading not distance. 

      Distance vision was corrected with lasik 20 years ago. With the aging process, even that wonderful clear vision gradually blurred. 

      I received multifocal toric Lens in right eye. Multifocal Lens in left eye. Restor 2.5 I wanted to be able to see clearly at all distances and right now my vision is worse than before having cataract surgery. 

    • Posted

      if you are using temporary readers for the time being of 1.75 in left and 2.0 in right for reading, then your prescription for distance is only about -0.5D, which is not that different from the desired value of about -0.25D.

      Then, why are you saying that your lens power is way off

    • Posted

      Hi Julielyn - if you had prior lasik surgery for distance and now have had cataract surgery it would not benefit you now.  To clarify after cataract surgery the contact lenses I had and glasses would be irrelevant.  If I needed to correct distance I would need a whole new prescription or opt for lasik.

      I think what 201a was asking is what is the prescription you need now to get clear distance vision (as you say your distance vision is currently blurry).   If it is just a matter of the lens power being off (IOL) then that can be corrected with either glasses or lasik surgery.  But you will want to know if it can be corrected with glasses.  An optometrist should be able to tell you what your current prescription is.

      If your eyes cannot be corrected with glasses there is another underlying issue with your vision.

    • Posted

      Because I have multifocal lenses to be able to see without glasses at any distance 
    • Posted

      Yes sue.an  I understand what you are saying. The problem is I currently have the wrong power iol. The dr said so. Has said so from day one of follow up. Doing lasik now would be pointless. My point is, that even going through exams to find which is better than, the vision is not clear. It is clearer. So my fear is Will lasik or PRK correct the blurry vision once the correct power is installed to the point of no need for glasses. 

      The whole point of installing multifocal iol was to avoid wearing glasses 

      In the past 18 months I’ve been to two optometrists and one opthomologist. No one has said anything about any eye problems other than aging/cataracts and lens replacements have been suggested. 

      This post was about exchanging current iol. I plan on doing just that for clearer vision. 

      How many others have had exchanges and it’s been a problem? Any other further steps needed after an exchange? 

    • Posted

      A lens exchange is a more riskier procedure than initial cataract surgery requiring more skill.  If considering going that route I hope you are seeking out someone else to do that surgery.

      My own surgeon made it clear prior to my surgeries he does not do exchanges.

      Also a surgeon should never promise you are glasses free with a premium multifocal lens. I think you can reasonably expect less dependence on them.  

      You still should find out what you actual prescription is andvreadons for power being off.

    • Posted

      Why do you say doing lasik now would be pointless?  If you are wanting to be glasses free or less dependent on them it may be a safer route than a lens exchange.  If the opthamologist doesn’t know the reason why power is off whose to say he or she doesn’t make same mistake with a lens exchange?
    • Posted

      These are exactly my thoughts sue.an. As I’ve said I’m having a second opinion tomorrow. As I look through my chart. The dr installed the lens that the machines in his office suggested. The ORA measurements I’ve yet to discover. I’m not sure if they are in the surgical centers chart. 

      Each weekly visit to the surgeon/opthomologist we have done many tests. Dialing in to find which power would provide clearer vision. Lasik enchancement was suggested before cataract surgery. But obviously getting the correct power is the first step. I don’t think the dr/surgeon has made a major mistake. I believe my measurements were off. He did the best he could. 

    • Posted

      Wish you all the best Julielyn!  Hopefully you get those answers at tomorrow ‘s visit and at least you have some questions for them.

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.