Repeat TURPS
Posted , 5 users are following.
Just wanted to contribute about not expecting the same recovery from repeated TURPS. Had my second in five years, six weeks ago and recovery is definitely slower and pain on urination and spasms are continuing though I see some gradual improvement. I guess we all compare what happened last time (pretty quick recovery, minimal symptoms) and if its different we look for some unidentified major complication. Every time will be different and ya just have to take the ride. Having said that, if youre worried about anything continue to pester your Urologist about it. Thats what you are paying for. They can do a cystoscopy in their surgery rooms these days to check anything untoward.
0 likes, 12 replies
ChuckP roboz
Posted
mike88486 ChuckP
Posted
ChuckP mike88486
Posted
mike88486 ChuckP
Posted
Europe, especially Germany, is more advanced with respect to herbal medicines, which is why I'm using the pumpkin seed oil from Germany and Prostasan from Switzerland.
mike88486 ChuckP
Posted
mike88486 ChuckP
Posted
roboz ChuckP
Posted
I had a pretty good four and a half years and you may get the full fifteen years benefit with no retrograde ejaculation. I dont regret having the first one but the first three weeks post op is pretty uncomfortable. But I'd go for it if I had the choice again ( which I did, Hah!). By the way, I checked out laser with some high profile professor at the time of the first TURP and he said laser had a high percentage chance of needing a repeat within two years.
Look., youre looking at a pretty sensitve area of your anatomy and any surgery is going to muck you around for a while. There are risks involved and the best thing I can suggest is to google as much medical stats as to the range of outcomes. All the best.
roboz ChuckP
Posted
derek76 roboz
Posted
I refused a TURP for my 35 gram prostate in 1995 after researching it. I waited for PVP Green Light Laser to reach England and had it on my by then 75 gram prostate in 2005 with practically instant recovery. I Travelled to Scotland by train on the second day and on day three life was back to normal and I spent the day at the races.
It quickly started to grow again and had reached 125 grams by 2013 when I had Holmium laser surgery with a massive amount of tissue taken away. That recovery was slower as still passing blood they sent me home with a catheter and I got an infection.
Now only two years later it has grown to 52 grams. I'm not too concerned as the only symptom is a slowish flow but it is possibly the cause of the UTI’s, prostatitis and more recently epididymitis that I get. I’ve recently had a flow test and a DRE and on Friday will be having a cystoscopy.
roboz derek76
Posted
derek76 roboz
Posted
After my 2013 procedure I asked the surgeon how much tissue he had taken away and he just replied lots. I asked after the cystoscopy that if my prostate was now 50grams from the pre op 130grams how much has it grown. He looked at the operation notes and said that 36 grams had been removed.
I said 130 - 36 and now 50 how come?? I was told that some is lost by vaporisation. I am dubious about that amount being lost that way.
No reason concluded for my often slow flow or very low small output.
He did suggest an alpha blocker to help the flow but I told him of previous problems with them. I had meant to ask about daily Cialis but forgot. I will ask my GP about that.
Next appointment for another flow test in nine months. I told him no more DRE's as the stimulation of my vagus nerve during it caused my BP to drop and I went into atrial fibrillation and needed a week on a beta blocker to get back in sinus rhythm. The same thing happened after I had a colonoscopy in 2013. That time I needed a cardioversion to get back in sinus rhythm.
He said that he had read of this happening but had not come across a case of it. I told him that the nurse at my GP practice said that it is quite common. He said that of course he tends not to see the patients again after DRE, TRUSS and cystoscopy as they then see the urologist.
vernon70267 mike88486
Posted
There just has to be something lacking in a man's diet that causes the prostate to grow like that. There just has to be. If only we could discover the missing dietary item. Whoever does will be rich, unless of course it happens to be something natural. Then of course the pharmaceutical industry will create it and patent it so they get richer. What could it be? What could it be? Anybody?