REZUM--HAVE YOU HAD THIS DONE???????
Posted , 385 users are following.
I had a nice conversation today with the President of the "Urology Times". He was telling me that there is a "New Procedure" that has been approved called the "REZUM SYSTEM". The company that makes the system is called "NXThera, Inc". You can google them up and lots of stuff comes up. I called them for a referral and they gave me a Doctor in Minnepolis that has done it over 50 times now. I called his nurse and she said he would call me back and answer my questions on monday. As you guys probably know Doctors are not very good at returning calls but we'll see what happens. Iam not very good at explaining how the procedure works but basically they take the device and put it up the uretha and vaporize the prostate cells which kills them. It works with high pressure "steam" that at a certain degree will kill the prostate tissue. My question for you guys is there anybody out there that has had it done to them and how are you getting along and are there "side effects", etc etc?????
35 likes, 5645 replies
mike588 ChuckP
Posted
I asked a Urologist's nurse - I think he's been doing Rezum for maybe a year, she said 10% retro is what they are seeing so far.
robert81316 mike588
Posted
Why does retro even happen? Damage to the bladder neck making the muscles weak? Wouldn't kegels fix that? I just dont understand why these procedures can cause retro, especially REZUM
kenneth1955 mike588
Posted
mike588 robert81316
Posted
a urologist told me most procedures change the way the duct to the bladder shuts, think of it like it's a plug, but because some of prostate cut away the plug does not shut tight any more, so semen goes into bladder.
robert81316 mike588
Posted
mike588 robert81316
Posted
Another cause of retro is if surgeon damages ejaculatory ducts
robert81316 mike588
Posted
I would assume if he damaged the duxts it wouldn't come out at all. That's frightening to think like that. To be honest I got scared when nothing came out. But having the three previous I am hopeful I will be fine in a couple more weeks. I will update to let everyone know
mike588 robert81316
Posted
kenneth1955 mike588
Posted
Mike I don't think it has anything to do with the bladder neck when the REZUM is done because the steam goes inside of the prostate. If you put the steam on the left side of the prostate that is where the ejaculatory duct comes in to the prostate. The steam does not know what is good tissue or bad so the duct can be destroy. With all the other surgery doctor destroy the bladder neck and that is why it does not close. You can read up on it on the internet. Have a good day Ken If you don't want retro with the REZUM procedure only have the steam put in on the right side
mike588 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 mike588
Posted
nealpros robert81316
Posted
Another kind of RE can happen in a PAE. The blood supply to the prostate is somewhat blocked causing the prostate to shrink. The smaller prostate produces much less seminal fluid, but the sensations are all the same, and you wouldn't know there was any change if you weren't looking at the end of your penis as you ejaculate.
Neal
robert81316 mike588
Posted
Thanks Mike! I'll keep you guys posted on updates
JerseyUrology kenneth1955
Posted
While directing ablation away from the ducts may be helpful, treating just one lobe should retain some antegrade ejaculation if that is an issue for a patient, although may lead to substandard treatment.
boyd93082 ChuckP
Posted
I had no problem peeing before procedure, though stream was weak. Principal issue was urinary retention, at least 600 ml, even after voiding twice. But I only got up to pee once or twice a night. Reason for procedure was that I had been set up for radiation therapy for prostate cancer. But doctors were concerned about usual side effect in late stage of treatment that affects ability to pee. They decided to attack the BPH first. An additional potential benefit was that all of my cancer seemed to be confined to the transitional zone. So there was a possibility for a "twofer." But the BPH had to be addressed in any case. Doc said he was extra aggressive on the steam, so he was not surprised at my first post-op checkup a week after when I was still self-catheterizing. Said to give it time. Well, it's over 60 days now and I'm still unable to pee w/o a catheter. It's inconvenient, but not painful in any way. I joined this forum to see if others experienced 60+ days of catheterizing. It appears to be rare, but not out of the question. Anyone with similar long-cath experience out there? How long. What did you do to make it end? And advice other than "patience"?
oldbuzzard boyd93082
Posted
If you had a really big prostate, that could explain it, as they've found it takes longer to work with big ones. You probably have bladder issues too if you were retaining that much.
When I went 3 weeks without a drop (a record at the time) my doc thought my bladder might have been shocked and prescribed a course of Myrbetriq which definitely helped.
On a different track, if you have this many issues after Rezum, unless you have a high Gleason score, you might want to consider foregoing the radiation and just keeping an eye on it. You might end up with pee issues for a really long time for a cancer with a very small chance of causing harm.
I would have your doc measure your prostate size and compare it to prior to Rezum, to determine how much of your problem is prostate related. If it's the same size or smaller, your issue is probably your bladder. If it's significantly bigger (still swollen) time will heal it, but a temporary Stent would allow you to pee.
JerseyUrology boyd93082
Posted
If you had >600 cc of urine in your bladder prior to a prostate procedure, you were in retention with overflow incontinence.
It would be likely that even removing your prostate you would continue to have retention.
Did you have preoperative urodynamics to demonstrate if the bladder had any activity before having a procedure ?
jimjames JerseyUrology
Posted
@JerseyUrology: If you had >600 cc of urine in your bladder prior to a prostate procedure, you were in retention with overflow incontinence.
It would be likely that even removing your prostate you would continue to have retention.
---------------------
They drained 1500ml out of me with a catheter (after a 400ml natural void) just prior to a six week rehab period of CIC prior to urodynamic testing which would determine if I were a candidate for TURP.
Urodynamics showed I had enough pressure left for a successful TURP but I decided to pass and self cathed instead. My retention at that point was still over 600ml. Three years of CIC bladder rehab later, most of the time I can do natural voids without retention.
Point being that a retention of 600ml doesn't mean you are doomed to retention, even in a case like mine where the obstruction was never removed. The key appears to be bladder rehabilitation. But I agree, one needs urodynamic testing to make sure there is something to work with.
Jim
boyd93082 JerseyUrology
Posted
Thanks to you and others for the responses.
jimjames boyd93082
Posted
Urodynamics more directly measures bladder function. Probably a good idea to get it done and preferably video urodynamics when bladder neck obstruction may be an issue and/or difficult to diagnose cases of incontinence. You may have to look around for a doctor that does video urodynamics.
Jim