Cachexia

Professional Reference articles are written by UK doctors and are based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. They are designed for health professionals to use, so you may find the language more technical than the condition leaflets.

Cachexia is weight loss and deterioration in physical condition.

Cachexia is not starvation; starvation may be part of cachexia and cachexia may result from starvation but they are different. It is associated with various serious illnesses including:

  • Many types of cancer (particularly of the pancreas, stomach, oesophagus, colon and rectum).
  • HIV/AIDS.
  • Congestive heart failure.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Tuberculosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis.
  • Crohn's disease.

It is also seen in the elderly, without any apparent associated disease.

An international collaborative has defined cancer-related cachexia thus:[1]

A multi-factorial syndrome defined by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass (with or without loss of fat mass) that cannot be reversed by conventional nutritional support and leads to progressive functional impairment. The pathophysiology is characterised by a negative protein and energy balance driven by a variable combination of reduced food intake and abnormal metabolism.

Suggestions have been made to modify the definition to include factors such as C-reactive protein (CRP) level and appetite loss. A four category model has also been proposed - ie non-cachexic, ore-cachexic, cachexic and refractory.[2]Ongoing research is helping to refine the definition further.[3]

Cancer cachexia impairs quality of life and response to therapy, which increases morbidity and mortality of cancer patients.[4]It is seen in 50% of cancer patients and accounts for at least 20% of deaths.[5]

This is a common complication of chronic heart failure (CHF) which is associated with a poorer prognosis. It is defined as involuntary loss of 5% of body mass in twelve months or less. Myofibrillar proteins are degraded and there is also reduced protein synthesis. Endocrine factors are thought to play a regulatory role.[6]

Adipose tissue cells (adipocytes) have been shown to release enzymes in CHF, which induce skeletal muscle wasting and reduce fat and bone mass.[7]

Cancer cachexia represents the clinical consequence of an interaction between the tumour, the host metabolism and the involvement of pro-inflammatory cytokines (protein molecules which signal cells to produce an inflammatory reaction).[8] The changes seen in cachexia may be characterised by an accelerated loss of skeletal muscle, often accompanied by loss of appetite and altered taste.

Skeletal muscle wasting is the principal cause of function impairment, fatigue and respiratory complications, The mechanisms involved have not been entirely elucidated but it is known that there is an increase in an enzyme, protein kinase R, which leads to muscle atrophy by a process of protein synthesis depression and an increase in degradation.[9]

Adipose tissue loss is due to lipolysis. This is driven by a number of chemical triggers including lipid mobilising factor (LMF). Loss of adipose tissue and skeletal muscle mass is characteristic of cancer cachexia. Starvation on the other hand causes only loss of adipose tissue.[10]

There is also an increase in the synthesis of proteins involved in the response to tissue injury - the so-called 'acute-phase response'.

Pathological changes occur in response to the body's acute-phase response to tissue damage, including synthesis by the liver of large amounts of proteins - eg, CRP, complement factors, fibrinogen and many others.

There are many causes of abnormal weight loss apart from cancer and cardiac failure. See separate Abnormal Weight Loss article for a full list.

Treatment of the underlying condition is important. Treatment of the cachexia per se needs a multi-targeted approach.[11]

General measures

Hypercaloric feeding has repeatedly been shown as ineffective in increasing lean mass. It may cause weight gain but this is due to deposition of fat.[12]The metabolic adaptations, notably the increase in the rate of protein catabolism, limit the ability of hypercaloric feeding to reverse the depletion of lean mass.

Parenteral nutritional support improves the way cancer patients withstand treatment and has a place in the palliative care of certain patients - eg, those with intestinal obstruction.[13]

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends oral, enteral or parenteral support (according to need and swallowing ability) for adults when:[14]

  • BMI is <18.5 kg/m3.
  • There has been >10% of total body weight lost in the preceding 3-6 months.
  • BMI is <20 and there has been 5% weight loss in the preceding 3-6 months.

The European Palliative Care Research Collaborative guidelines recommend that the enteral route should be used in certain patient groups (eg, to reverse weight loss). However, in refractory cachexia (patients with advanced cancer in whom a reversal of weight loss seems unlikely), normal eating should be encouraged in order to avoid stress-related eating disorders.[15]

See also separate Enteral Feeding and Nutritional Support in Primary Care articles.

Pharmacological measures[16]

  • Insulin: insulin resistance is observed in cachexia. The possibility of utilising the insulin signalling system is currently being explored.[17]
  • Growth hormone, testosterone, oxandrolone and megestrol acetate have all been used with beneficial effect and the use of the orexigenic (= appetite-stimulating) peptide ghrelin is being explored.[18]
  • Enobosarm (a selected androgen receptor modulator) and anamorelin (a ghrelin agonist) have completed phase III trials.[19]
  • Anti-inflammatory agents such as indometacin may be beneficial in patients with high CRP levels. The benefits of anti-inflammatory agents may be more apparent in non-malignant conditions and convey little benefit in patients with refractory cachexia.
  • Steroids - eg, methylprednisolone - may be used in refractory cachexia for short periods (eg, two weeks).
  • There may be a role for antioxidants in combating oxidative stress.
  • Because of metabolic derangements seen in cancer cachexia, effective nutritional treatment regimens will probably require manipulation of host intermediary metabolism in addition to feeding: omega-3 fatty acids (eg, eicosapentaenoic acid) have been studied for their ability to reduce cytokine release but their benefits are not clearly established.
  • Vitamin and mineral supplementation may be required in some cases.

Overall, the prognosis for the cachexia depends upon the severity of the underlying disease.[20]

Exercise is being explored as a possible preventative measure against cancer cachexia. Nutritional counselling is also likely to be of benefit.

Did you find this information useful?

Original Author:
Dr Hayley Willacy
Current Version:
Dr Laurence Knott
Peer Reviewer:
Dr Helen Huins
Document ID:
1106 (v23)
Last Checked:
18 April 2016
Next Review:
17 April 2021

Disclaimer: This article is for information only and should not be used for the diagnosis or treatment of medical conditions. Patient Platform Limited has used all reasonable care in compiling the information but make no warranty as to its accuracy. Consult a doctor or other health care professional for diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions. For details see our conditions.