Professional Reference articles are designed for health professionals to use. They are written by UK doctors and based on research evidence, UK and European Guidelines. You may find one of our health articles more useful.
Treatment of almost all medical conditions has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. NICE has issued rapid update guidelines in relation to many of these. This guidance is changing frequently. Please visit https://www.nice.org.uk/covid-19 to see if there is temporary guidance issued by NICE in relation to the management of this condition, which may vary from the information given below.
This is a benign inflammatory condition of unknown aetiology with dermal papules and annular plaques. Histology reveals foci of degenerative collagen with palisaded granulomatous inflammation.
A number of variants of the condition are recognised:
Aetiology is essentially not known. Associations with systemic illnesses including diabetes, thyroid disease, malignancy and hyperlipidaemia have been suggested but not proven.It is thought to be due to a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to some part of the dermis with inflammation mediated by tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha).
It is a not uncommon condition but figures on incidence are not available. Women are affected more often than men, with a ratio of 2.3:1.
Localised is the most common type, accounting for around three quarters of all cases. This type is usually found in those under 30 years old. Lesions are typically localised to the dorsal surfaces of hands and/or feet. It is usually self-limiting within two years.
The generalised form includes generalised annular, disseminated papular and atypical generalised subtypes. It represents about 10-15% of cases. There are 10 or more lesions. It tends to last for longer and be more likely to require treatment. It usually occurs in adults, and may occur particularly around the skin folds of the trunk.
Subcutaneous granuloma annulare is most often seen in children, particularly between the ages of two and five. These may be mistaken for rheumatoid nodules.
Perforating granuloma annulare is the least common type. It occurs most often in children and young adults. There can be both localised and generalised forms. These are more likely to be symptomatic, causing pain or itch.
Both localised and generalised varieties are usually asymptomatic. The subcutaneous variety may become a large subcutaneous mass. Lesions may be stable for months and then enlarge over weeks. Perforating types may present with pain or itch.
Localised lesions are usually groups of papules, about 1-2 mm in diameter with possible erythema. They tend to form an arc or a ring 1-5 cm in diameter. The centre of lesions may be slightly depressed and hyperpigmented. They are usually on the dorsal surfaces of hands, feet and fingers and the extensor surface of arms and legs.
Localised granuloma annulare on the hand
(Note the ring of papules and the hyperpigmented sunken centre)
The generalised variety has a similar appearance to the localised lesions but they are more numerous and more diffuse. They may coalesce into annular plaques 3-6 cm in diameter and these can expand over weeks or months. They tend to be on the limbs or the trunk. Subcutaneous lesions are firm, skin-coloured or pink, and not tender, and the overlying skin looks normal. They are usually solitary lesions but can occur in clusters. The lower limb, especially the pretibial surface is the most common area. Lesions are mobile, except on the scalp.
Generalised granuloma annulare on the leg
Attribution: Kreuter et al, My Core Competency is Competency via Wikimedia Commons.
Perforating lesions are papules 1-4 mm in diameter with possibly some degree of erythema. They may be solitary or number in hundreds but often coalesce to form annular plaques. They tend to be larger and more ulcerated where they occur in middle-aged or elderly people and the lesions may leave hyperpigmented or hypopigmented scars. They tend to be on the extensor surface or lower arms or legs or the dorsal surface of hands. 'Perforating' refers to the histological appearance of the degenerating collagen fibres, rather than the clinical appearance.
Diagnosis is essentially clinical and laboratory tests are not helpful unless another diagnosis is suspected. If in doubt, biopsy may be helpful.
Many annular skin lesions may be mistaken for granuloma annulare. Differential diagnosis includes:
- Lichen planus
- Rheumatoid nodules
- Tinea corporis
- Pityriasis rosea
- Nummular eczema
- Erythema chronicum migrans
In granuloma annulare, there are no surface changes to the skin. There is no scale, there are no vesicles or pustules, and the skin surface is smooth.
The local type does not usually require treatment, as it is asymptomatic and self-limiting. The generalised type may produce cosmetic embarrassment and require intervention. However, there is no evidence-based therapy available. Over 30 different therapies have been described in the literature for granuloma annulare, but most are single case reports or small series or not double-blind/placebo-controlled.
Options for localised lesions include:
- Intralesional steroid injection: almost always effective for local disease but less effective and less practical in generalised disease, and more steroid is needed.
- Potent steroid creams: may be enhanced by using under occlusion.
- Cryotherapy: may be effective for small lesions but may cause hypopigmentation or hyperpigmentation.
- Laser ablation.
Generalised disease is not so amenable to the steroid treatment and is also less likely to resolve spontaneously. Systemic treatments have been disappointing. There are many options, none of which has a solid evidence base. They include:
- Psoralen combined with ultraviolet A (PUVA) treatment.
- Oral steroids.
- Ciclosporin and methotrexate.
- Antibiotic combinations such as minocycline plus rifampicin plus ofloxacin.
- Antimalarials, such as hydroxychloroquine.
- The TNF inhibitor infliximab - may be useful in recalcitrant cases.[5, 6]Adalimumab has also been reported to be effective.
With subcutaneous lesions in children, the best management is reassurance, although they can be excised surgically.
Treatment of perforating lesions is disappointing.
Most cases of localised granuloma annulare are self-limiting. Half of all cases will settle within two years. 40% of children have recurrent lesions. The prognosis for generalised disease is worse, with some having a chronic course lasting up to 10 years, poor response to treatment, low chance of spontaneous remission and high risk of recurrence. Subcutaneous lesions often resolve spontaneously but may recur elsewhere.
Further reading and references
Marcus DV, Mahmoud BH, Hamzavi IH; Granuloma annulare treated with rifampin, ofloxacin, and minocycline combination therapy. Arch Dermatol. 2009 Jul145(7):787-9. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.55.
Cyr PR; Diagnosis and management of granuloma annulare. Am Fam Physician. 2006 Nov 1574(10):1729-34.
Thornsberry LA, English JC 3rd; Etiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic management of granuloma annulare: an update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013 Aug14(4):279-90. doi: 10.1007/s40257-013-0029-5.
Hertl MS, Haendle I, Schuler G, et al; Rapid improvement of recalcitrant disseminated granuloma annulare upon treatment with the tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor, infliximab Br J Dermatol 2005 Mar
Murdaca G, Colombo BM, Barabino G, et al; Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment with infliximab for disseminated granuloma annulare. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2010 Dec 111(6):437-9. doi: 10.2165/11311040-000000000-00000.
Werchau S, Enk A, Hartmann M; Generalized interstitial granuloma annulare--response to adalimumab. Int J Dermatol. 2010 Apr49(4):457-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04348.x.