Quick move to hydroxy - should I wait for venesection effects

Posted , 9 users are following.

Hi.  I was diagnosed with probable PV on 23.1.18 with a haematocrit level of 63%.  Was started on immediate aspirin and weekly venesections.  By 22nd Feb it was down to 51% and heading down further the following week.  At my Consultant appointment PV was confirmed.  I was told that the venesections were not working for me, prescribed with hydroxycarbomide and bi-weekly venesections.  My question is whether I should take the hydroxy straight away as according the results from the haematology unit, the venesections are working well.  I would prefer to wait for medication intervention until it was confirmed absolutely necessary by the venesection results.  Do I just take the medication or ask for another appointment or second opinion to decide on the way forward?  Thank you for your comments - really appreciate this forum as I deal with my diagnosis.

0 likes, 72 replies

72 Replies

Prev Next
  • Posted

    Hello Sue, 

    I, like you, am 53 and was diagnosized with pv 1 year ago.  Started with venesections for 4 or 5 months, as my hematocrite went down, my platelets were out of control (over 1 million) so my dr started me on Hydroxyurea . My numbers went down except for my White blood cells that grew too big. My bigger side effect was fatigue and some gastro-intestinal problems. I am now on Jakavi and life is good, no problem for now and all numbers are back where they belong. Ask your dr why he wants to put you on meds rightaway.

    Marie

  • Posted

    I was diagnosed with PCV ten years ago and had venesections for the first 6 or 7 years !

    I was persuaded to go onto Hydroxycarbamide and I too was reluctant to take what is effectively a cancer drug, but since taking this, I have avoided further venesections and my HCT has levelled off - currently 40 !

    I now only have 6 monthly appointments with the Consultant .

  • Posted

    Hello Sue,

    As you will see there are different approaches to this PV disorder.  Generally venesection is used to control the initial symptoms but it has limitations.  Hydroxycarbamide will normally control the symptoms once the venesections have done their job.  The problem with Hydroxy is that it is a much stronger medication to take with some unwelcome symptoms to combat, but platelets are a very important constituent of the blood and with good medical supervision these can be controlled with Hydroxy without recourse.  One needs to be aware of the long-term use of this medication as it is a powerful drug and once its effects diminish can produce its own symptoms.  However, it can really control PV and if medically supervised be an excellent treatment.  I took this preparation for very many years before it reacted on me and I was prescribed a newer drug (Ruxolitinib) which has stabilised my blood count admirably.  I would add that as a new drug its long-term use is not fully known.  There are other medicines in the pipe-line which will eventually become available for use.  The important thing is once Hydroxy is prescribed, to advise your Haematologist of any adverse re-actions, if any.  This preparation better controls the platelet count of the blood which venesections are unable to do with the platelets forming an important part of the blood readings as well as Haematocrit.  PV is a variable disease and its treatment individually prescribed depending on your Haematologists tests.   It is also very rare and one of the group of illnesses defined within Myelo Proliferative Disorders (MPD's).   You are obviously concerned about receiving this medication as well as venesections and I would suggest you discuss your doubts with this specialist who will control your future treatments.   Dealt with correctly, you should look forward to a good and active life.  You will note from this forum that some sensible advice is always available from like sufferers who will be pleased to assist you where possible. Best wishes.

    Peter.

     

  • Posted

    Thank you very much for the replies.  I am encouraged to take a bit more time and make sure that I get my questions answered.  It is so encouraging to have a place like this where you can hear the experiences of others. Will let you know what happens as I continue to learn more about the condition and continue my treatment.  Sue
  • Posted

    Good luck.

    It’s a confusing disease because it affects different people in many different ways. 

    As Peter says, it’s a rare disease which has only relatively recently been tracked down to genetics. Even the medical community is still learning.

    However, we here on the forum all have something to contribute in the way of support, even so.

    Let us know how you get on.

  • Posted

    I was Diagnosed, October 2017  with polycythaemia vera. While waiting for the result I was put on venesection two or three times a week along with hydroxycarbamide 4 x 500mg daily. In December 2017 the correct levels were established venesection was stopped and I’ve been left on hydroxycarbamide since that time. Along with a host of other blood pressure and blood thickness  pills And once every three months see the consultant,  Who says he is happy with the result.  I have noted on this forum but some people refuse to take hydroxycarbamide so I cannot speak about how they get on with just venesection to keep the blood thickness correct. But this is the course that I have taken partly because Venesection is a problem for me  as I have a tendency to faint. Side-effects of hydroxycarbamide vary from person to person. But for me I note the following  side-effects,  fatigue, and a compromised immune system so that in the UK lately people have been going down with a very heavy cold, I had to go to hospital ( I was called in for an assessment, And told by Dr why didn’t you Do anything about this earlier ) for a blood test,  and 2 bacteria tests from the blood  and been prescribed 2 antibiotics before I started getting better.  I was given a pamphlet on hydroxycarbamide and one for polycythaemia vera they make for interesting and informative reading about the condition or disease 
    • Posted

      Hello niloc, I think that I am the only stubborn old bu$$€r who refuses to take the drugs. biggrin But then I don’t have a problem with giving blood - I told them to take it all and then I wouldn’t have to bother them again but they wouldn’t  play ball.biggrin

      I think a lot of how we feel physically depends on our confidence in our course of treatment and in those who are treating us.

      Our bodies are all different and our experiences are all different. It would be a dull old world if we were all the same, though I am sure it would make the doctors’ lives simpler it were so. I am glad to hear that you have found the correct course of treatment. It can take a while. 

    • Posted

      Hello Niloc,

      You seem to have trodden a well established path to reach your current situation.   The symptoms you have felt are quite usual in the circumstances.  Would suggest you do not forget to pass on any symptoms you suffer to your Haematologist and this is particularly important when using Hydroycarbamide over a lengthy period.  I have frequently suggested to people to seek the booklets on PV etc because they are regularly

      updated and very informative.  Most Haematologists can provide these especially at a hospital.  Any illness you suffer when on these drugs should be notified as one or two serious matters could affect you without you really understanding the problem.   I know from personal experience.   Stay well.

      Peter.

       

  • Posted

    Hi everyone.  Thank you for the most recent comments.  I sent an e mail to the Consultant and was very grateful to get a telephone appointment with him to discuss my concerns.  He agreed that I could continue with venesection only (probably only one more until I get to the 45% haematocrit target) and we will then see how quickly levels go up before making any further decisions about the way forward.  I feel much more peaceful about this and am very happy that there was a good discussion.  Will be continuing to keep up with forum updates with interest.  Thanks again for your help and experiences.
    • Posted

      Hello Sue,

      You seem to be approaching this problem very well.  My view is it is best to let the Haematologist do the worrying, just give him/her all the facts and symptoms to think about.   PV is a serious disorder with numerous variations to consider.    It is a long term illness to contend with so just don't take your worries with you.   By all means learn of things as you go along and adapt as necessary.  Because the disorder is so rare it's unlikely you will come face to face with another sufferer unless your clinic is in a big hospital.   In all the time visiting my hospital I've not yet come across another person with PV or indeed any MPN disorder but I believe there are now one or two about in my hospital's remit.   The haematology department have been massive for me.

      That's where this forum is useful.  Best wishes.

      Peter.  

  • Posted

    I was diagnosed with the disease now after a bone marrow test and a mutation test. I AM 66 YEARS OLD. I'm not symptomatic. My blood test results are HB15.6 hematocrit 47/6  . I started to take aspirin, but I refuse to take another medication as required by the protocol because of age. My hematologist, had to agree. Am I right?

     

    • Posted

      Hello rivka,

      Apart from your having had a bone marrow test, you sound exactly like me.

      You say that your haematologist “had to agree” with your decision. Is there was a degree of friction in your relationship with your haematologist? Your haematologist is an expert in their field. You are the mistress of your destiny. I have been in a similar position as yourself. I too only take aspirin. I too have a haematology team who feel that I should be taking their advice to take hydroxycarbamide because of my age (66). But I don’t think that they exactly “had to” comply with my wishes. I have a very good relationship with them all.

      Am I right? Who can say. I don’t know if I am “right”; I only know that I am doing what I feel is best for me. I could be completely wrong and end up paralysed by a stroke which maybe would not have happened if I had taken the drugs. I do know that if I took the drugs, however efficacious they turned out to be, I would “feel” ill, I would “feel” like I am living in the Land of the Unwell whereas on a day to day basis I feel fine just now.

      There really is no correct answer to your question. You can only do what you think is right for you.

      Best wishes.

    • Posted

      Thank you very much Angela for your balanced and honest response. My hematologist claimed that medication was needed. I feel, just like you wrote. I feel great and I have no symptoms. Bone marrow testing was also moderate. Given my attitude and the results, she agreed with me, of course, without any friction.

      I'd love to hear about people in a similar situation. What has evolved over time. Even if someone has found that a particular diet may help. What about omega-3 (in addition to aspirin)?

       

    • Posted

      Hard to say about taking supplements or adopting a particular diet.

      This disease is like the mythical chimera. Although the basis of it is an overabundance of red blood cells, some people have too many platelets as well and some have trouble with white cells.

      In my case, the platelet numbers are high. I have, for my own amusement, adopted a diet which has been medically proved to reduce the number of platelets in normal people. But we are not normal people. My platelet numbers have stayed at the same-ish level (not nearly as high as they used to be) for some time. I have no idea whether my diet has contributed to this or not but I continue with it because it agrees with me.

      If you decide to try something out, make sure that you base your ideas on scholarly articles that you find online. Don’t listen to fads, fanatics and fools. Read only what the medical profession says. Above all, eat and drink things that you like. No point in suffering twice over, once with the disease and once with the thought of what awaits you in the fridge.cheesygrin

    • Posted

      Hello Rivka,

      Of course, you should always be in control of your own destiny and particularly where your health is concerned.  Perhaps you need to know that PV was first discovered about 150 years ago by some researchers in S. America (I believe Mexico) when a paper on the disease was first circulated.  And so it remained until 1920's when it was again made aware of in UK.  In more recent years it has gained more prominence and just 15 years ago the Jak2 gene was identified by researchers in US who have since carried this forward to the present situation.  PV remains a rare and serious illness and because of this there is still much for the medics to learn about.   The treatments available for them to use are limited in comparison with most other illnesses.  Within the past few years some new drugs have been formulated to deal directly with PV (and other MPN's) but they remain limited in use, often because of price restrictions and the absence of long-term knowledge.  Prior to these new offerings and treatments the existing treatments were formulated to deal with other different disorders and were used to treat PV as a best available treatment.   The doctors can only recommend what is available to them and what they know of the treatments and of the disease itself.   Generally local GP's are not too conversant with these MPN disorders for they will lose contact with the patient who will will be referred to a Haematologist for appraisal and then treatment.  I well remember my own Haematologist receiving me at my clinic appointment and waiting eagerly to inform me of the then breakthrough with the Jak2 discovery which has now led to some new medications being introduced for PV etc.  So try not to be too dismissive of what is on offer by the doctors but any treatment must of course be agreed with you.  You are ultimately responsible for what you take and will obviously have an opinion on the matter.  Give careful consideration to any treatment, for each patient is different and has different requirements.  Remember, your Haematologist is the specialist for your illness and will try their best for you.   As with many other complaints a particular medication or treatment may be found unfavourable or difficult to use in which case there are now more offerings available but still in limited supply.  I have suffered immeasurably from certain medications relating to PV but always found the Haematologist ready to react with some other treatment.   It isn't always easy but I remain in relatively good health.  Keep well./

      Peter.

    • Posted

      Thank you Peter for your detailed and supportive response. I am looking for an answer to the question of which values in the blood tests are likely to be a real risk. And when the values are borderline, is there any point in taking medications as long as they stay that way. After all, in a certain sense the disease might not have been revealed at all in this situation. In short, do early stage diagnosis is significant in PV?
    • Posted

      Well, that is a question and a half! Rightho.

      Aspirin is a chemical which makes your platelets more slippery and less likely to clump together, form a clot and bung up one of your blood vessels giving you a stroke or a heart attack. It does nothing to address the fact that your bone marrow is churning out blood cells like a nuclear power station with a broken “off” switch. 

      So you need to think about what the results of this process which is not being addressed. Without any treatment, your blood cells will contine to be generated and your spleen will have to work extra hard to try to remove them. Your spleen will grow in size. For the consequences of having an enlarged spleen you can consult doctor Google.

      Your veins will become stuffed with blood cells, become more sludgy and thick and unable to be pumped to your extremities. Your fingers will turn cold and blue. You may get gangrene.

      I don’t know what more may befall you if you do nothing other than take aspirin but it won’t be good.

      At the very least you are going to need to have regular venesections in order to have some of the excess blood removed. This will reduce all your readings apart from the platelets, which will rise a little after each venesection because they are trying to block the damage done to your body by the “injury” of the venesection.

       

    • Posted

      HI Rivka,

      I think Angela has defined your problem very well indeed,   PV is a progressive disease and you will find that treatments will be adjusted as you go.   For this reason differing medications will be used depending on the stage of your illness.  It is up to you to accept or refuse these but please remember that there isn't  much available for the doctor, he will have do a juggling act.  Initially venesection will control things suitably but there it begins and ends for after this it will be Hydroxycarbamide that will be used to control  the platelet count and haematocrit level.  These are important and will need regular scrutiny.  Ask your Haematologist for any medical advice on these points.  Values will go up and down depending on several factors as with any illness but as long as the counts are managed well  this should not prove a problem.     PV can be diagnosed at a very early age but it is usually more prevalent as you age.  It seems that 60 years is a guideline for the majority of patients.  It is how the disorder is dealt with once found.  Currently it is incurable but with way treatments are being introduced and the ongoing research into the problem things can change.  Since I was first diagnosed there have been several noticeable improvements that have produced good results.   As I have said, if you are unsure of anything the best person will be your Haematologist.  Good luck.

      Peter.

       

    • Posted

      Hello Rivka,

      You may already know this but I will point out that PV is recognised as a genetic defect which you are born with.  In most cases it will not manifest itself until one is into middle age which is when the majority of patients are diagnosed.    The earlier one is diagnosed the more difficult it can be to treat long-term

      However,  there is no evidence to suggest that the disorder is of an hereditary nature or that it can be transferred to others.    Take things as they come, and you will recognise that it can comfortably be lived with using the controls available.  Maintain a sensible diet and exercise as you can as this can also help.

      This forum is readily used by others who can always offer helpful advice.  Best wishes.

      Peter.

    • Posted

      Hello Peter

      I wonder what you're saying. My doctor says it probably started now. I thought differently. Maybe it was just discovered now. I remember that I had always had a viscous blood that made blood tests difficult. No one thought it meant anything. 40 years ago, when I was pregnant, I had a placenta separation, with sad results.No one thought it meant anything. Hot showers also caused redness and a bit of itching. So I thought'if it was there'and if there is a progress, but it is so slow, it is a pity to take aggressive drugs.

      Can you refer me to appropriate updated  articles?

      Thank you

      ?Rivka

    • Posted

      Hi Rivka,

      Thanks for your message.    Little was known about PV before the defective Jak2v gene was identified as the cause of PV about 15 years ago.  Since then research has taken the issue much farther and introduced some useful advances of knowledge and treatments.    Many patients have no signs or symptoms for many years but as time passes, these will very gradually increase but it is not unusual for these symptoms to be noticed and disregarded by patients as of no consequence (as did I).  Once the symptoms become more obvious and begin to take effect that is when medical advice is generally sought.  PV and MPN'S are progressive disorders commencing with the defective gene, which is very often not identified until much later in life and when it is becoming most prevalent.  It is when the disease makes itself more obvious that a diagnosis will likely be made.  The disease can be identified at a very early age but this is unusual.  It is in middle life that it usually manifests itself and when treatment commences.  The symptoms first noticed are the itching and possibly gout with perhaps skin discolouration (redder).  Males are more readily affected by PV than females.  It is because of the rarity of these MPN disorders that it took so long for them to become realised as serious and gaining attention.

      Many general doctors know only basic details of PV and the treatments used because once the illness is identified the patient is referred to the Haematologist who will thereafter test and treat the patient.  It may be a little different outside UK where medical practices are often different.  If you would care to visit the sections available on this Patient web-site you are now on there is a great deal of information to be found which answers many queries,  There are different web-sites that can be used but make sure that these are properly medically produced and amended when necessary.  One can often obtain official 

      booklets from Haematologists which I found very useful in discovering what these diseases represent.  From what you have explained of the history of your PV I would suggest that it is the defective gene at birth that is the source of your PV.  It is not known as an hereditary disease or transferrable.  Gook luck.

      Peter.

    • Posted

      Thank you very much Peter for your patience.

      Happily, I live in Israel where there is good and accessible medicine. My hematologist is in the ward of a large, advanced hospital. Still, as a person who has been informed that he has a serious illness, I want to be as sure as possible that I, along with the hematologist, make the decisions that are right for me personally, and not only according to the protocol.

      Highly appreciates your knowledge and patience.

      Rebecca

    • Posted

      Hello Rebecca,

      Highly unusual to hear from a patient in Israel.  I know your medical system is very efficient and that can only be good for you.  The rarity of PV is said to be 1 or 2 in 100,000 people but these things can vary but not by very much i would add.  You are most certainly correct to take a deep interest in your plight as it assists your understanding of PV and the treatment offered.   This is a personal issue and should be formulated just for you on the test results obtained as these results are personal and should remain so.

      As I pointed out earlier PV is a very variable disorder and symptoms often differ between PV patients.   Each patient is an individual and needs to be treated as such.  Your Haematologist will be your greatest ally and you may find it difficult to come across another person with the illness due to its rarity value.

      Keep well and I hope things progress kindly for you.

      Peter.

    • Posted

      Dear Angela

      I wonder why I was not recommended to do venesection.

      ?I am glad about it  ?ecause I have trouble finding veins. They are thin and deep.

      I'd also like to hear about the diet you mentioned/ thank you and be well/

      Rivka

    • Posted

      Hello Rebecca

      The strange combination of things that I eat and drink aren’t a diet exactly. I eat a normal range of foods although I am a long-term vegetarian and I no longer drink alcohol.

      The additional things that I eat and drink are designed to lower the number of platelets that I produce. You don’t say what your blood readings are so I don’t know if your platelet levels are high.

      In any case, I would never recommend that anyone else adopts my approach. I am not medically qualified.

      I don’t know why your doctor has not suggested venesections. You could ask and let the rest of us know.confused

    • Posted

      my platelet levels are? o.k (248). ill ask about the reason of not recommending  venesections (just to learn) in my next appointment in 4 month.

      ?I heard that omega 3 can be a blood thinner. I don't know if its good with aspirin. do you know some thing about?

      thanks

      Rivka

    • Posted

      I wouldn’t mess about with anything that might “thin the blood” if you are already taking aspirin. Too much “thinning” can be just as dangerous as not enough. 

      I am just back from the hospital chat and although my haematocrit has gone down to the magical 45% (from nearly 60 two years ago) my platelets have continued to rise and are now in the mid 700s. So much for my fancy “diet”redface. But I shall go on with it because I like it - even though it hasn’t done me much “good”.

      In the waiting room I met another woman with polycythaemia! We shook hands like comrades in arms.cheesygrin

    • Posted

      Good news about the reduction in hematocrit. Is it without treatment? I wish you continued improvement in the rest of the parameters as well​. How do  you feel?
    • Posted

      I hesitate to say that it’s the result of the venesections because it has a life of its own.confused

      I feel fine for 99% of the time. I only really notice that I get out of breath when I walk uphill these days. In the past I used to be a keenwalker and could almost run up hills. Other symptoms such as itchy skin are fleeting -maybe a few days. That is why I am so reluctant to go 9nto a regime of daily hydroxycarbamide. The doctors say things like “you won’t notice many side effects” to which I reply “but more than I notice now?” and they say that they don’t know. So I say that I am fine feeling fine, thanks, and I’ll leave it at that.

      By the way, which part of Israel do you live in? When I was a student, about a hundred years ago, I worked for a summer on a kibbutz near Megiddo. I’m not Jewish, I just fancied it. It was quite an interesting experience.

    • Posted

      If it helps, I have never been recommended venesections and have always been on medication to treat PV from the outset.  Usually this treatment is prescribed for early stage PV.  When this stage works itself out is when Hydroxycarbamide is introduced for it is superior in controlling both platelets and haematocrit than venesection.  It will always be balancing act for the doctors due to the vagaries of the illness.   I was 1st diagnosed with PV some twenty years ago now and promptly given medication.  It is your Haematology tests that indicate a treatment.  However, the consultant has the final decision   Your readings are well within the normal range for venesections.

      Peter.

    • Posted

      Hello Rebecca,

      I visited my Haematologist just 3 days ago for the 4-weekly tests.  I should point out that my PV about 2 years ago progressed to MF which is also one of the disorders within the group known as MPN's 

      (Myelo Proliferative Neoplasms) and to which PV belongs.  The results of my visit to the clinic were described as very satisfactory.  The medication I now take is Ruxolitinib (medical name) and Jakavi (manufacturers name) and I have used this medication now for 3 years.   Prior to this I was prescribed Hydroxycarbamibe which I took for a very long time which had become a problem for me due to adverse reactions.  At the time I was participating in the medical trials for Jakavi in UK which were also being conducted in other parts too.  My consultant Haematologist stopped the Hydroxy... treatment and obtained authorisation for me to take Jakavi.  You will gather that this is a new medication and not yet universally available for prescription.  The results have been absolutely positive so far with my blood tests returning to normal.  As a consequence I now feel very well and no symptoms.  Jakavi will also be a very expensive drug to obtain or prescribe.  It's long-term effects are unknown.  There are other similar type medications becoming available mostly in US where much of the research is conducted.  My supplies are from UK-NHS so for me cost is not an issue.  My view is that Hydroxy... if probably well supervised, can be a useful treatment for PV etc.  This medication was initially formulated to treat other disorders and still is.  It was always considered a "best available treatment" for PV as so little was known medically and otherwise about this complaint.  It still holds a place in PV treatment but unlike Jakavi, is not specifically directed to treat PV etc. which of course Jakavi is.  My condition slowly improved over about 18 months following my introduction to the new drug and seems to have stabilised with my continued use, without negative effects.  It should be stressed that different drugs will and can have different effects on those that use them.  With good medical control PV etc can be used over a lengthy time and should allow one a normal life span.  My medics agree.  The best requirement is to lead a healthy life, good diet and exercise, careful treatment regime and some trust in your medical advisers.

      It has worked for me.  Sorry to elaborate but it might save you needing more enquiries.

      Take care.    Peter.

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.