10% risk of CVD - Statins
Posted , 4 users are following.
Has anyone started taking statins or been offered them because their doctor has told them they have a 10% risk of Cardiovascular disease over the next 10 years? I think people get offered 20mg atorvastatin at this level? What are people's experiences at this level?
1 like, 15 replies
jude65855 t52767
Posted
mrbob84 t52767
Posted
jude65855 mrbob84
Posted
There;'s no doubt statins lower cholesterol but there are conflicting stats on how much cholesterol is a factor in cardio-vascular disease and death. Google "statins" and you'll probably find more information than you want to deal with!
mrbob84 t52767
Posted
I am not looking for personal stats, just general ones. Certainly the drug companies are stating them to the GPs they depend on to dispense them. Something must be convincing them. If not it's simply payola.
If they are not substantial, why are we risking our health going on statins! I'd rather die a few years earlier, enjoying my life, than die a slow death from these side effects.
jude65855 mrbob84
Posted
It was a hard decision for me, to make up my mind that I didn't know how long statins might or not might prolong my life and that I'd rather risk another heart attack than live in the state I was in when I was taking them.
There is the argument that assuming statins do reduce the cardio vascular risks and that they don't kill you, if we want to live as long as possible the answer is to take them. That's valid for some people, however there is the issue that most people aren't makng an informed choice to take them, they're just doing what their doctors tell them and then dealing with the negative effects later.
Lensgirl mrbob84
Posted
mrbob84 t52767
Posted
That was where I was coming from for the entire first year after my heart operation, as I took dose after dose, day after day after day, of the cocktail they designed for me when I got out. It took getting derailed because of my faulty, patchwork memory that the statins created - by lowering my cholesterol to well below normal - to wake me up to the fact that something must be missing here, in this equation!
I think that sitting a person down after a life threatening operation like that and spelling out what you're going to be taking, why, and what it might possibly do, should be essential to any doctor's healing plan for us.
At present it is most definitely not.
jude65855 mrbob84
Posted
I feel that it's important for us as patients to take some responsibility for what we're putting in our bodies and not rely 100% on our doctors for information regarding medication: obviously if they're prescribing it they believe it's ok.
This is not to say that some doctors aren't irresponsible: earlier this year a gp prescribed a new medication for my migraines, which had a clear warning on the manufacturer's website that it should never be taken by anyone with a heart condition: I promptly changed doctors and told her why.
mrbob84 t52767
Posted
While I agree with you that we should be taking responsibility for whatever we put into our bodies, the least those professionals should do is to say that there are negative side effects we need to be aware of and that we should definitely look over the pamphlet before embarking. To not do so - as Peter Paul and Mary once said in one of their songs - is lulling us into a false sense of security.
jude65855 mrbob84
Posted
I give most doctors the benefit of the doubt, that if they're prescribing something they believe the side effects are either minimal or balance out the positive effects: I haven't seen them as gods for decades now, but I do acknowledge that the same cardiologist who prescribed statins for me also saved my life by inserting a stent after I'd had a heart attack.
mrbob84 t52767
Posted
I think that PP&M phrase was from a live album, it was interjected while introducing a song...
jude65855 mrbob84
Posted
mrbob84 t52767
Posted
jude65855 mrbob84
Posted
mrbob84 t52767
Posted