1. Community
  2. Cancer
  3. Prostate Cancer

1st biopsy at 46. Anyone else experienced this in their 40's?

Posted , 4 users are following.

Easton
Easton

HI. Had All the usual problems associated with prostate difficulties (although I did not know this at the time when I made appointment with my GP) Saw GP and tested 5.1 psa. I had no idea what this meant at the time (only two weweeks ago). He ,given family history, advised meto see a urologist which I did only 3 days ago, before I knew it I was again advised by them to undergo a biopsy. This happened yesterday! However, reading through some of these posts im not entirely convinced I did the right thing (all though it's been done!) . Not a particularly pleasant experience, im mid 40's fairly fit and active with a young family. Not sure where it goes from here. Any similar experinces in your 40's?

1 like, 7 replies

7 Replies

  • Kombi_Cruiser
    Kombi_Cruiser Easton

    Posted

    G'day Easton...sorry I've been away for a few days...

    I was 50 when I was given my news and as you say it all meant nothing at the time... Your results will certainly tell all with regards your future as its seems to be the Gleeson Score that is the determining factor...Here's hoping you gat excellent results...

  • david41094
    david41094 Easton

    Posted

    I would recommend the protocol set out by Jay Cohen MD. I.E.

    1. Elevated PSA, then

    2.DRE and ultrasound to measure prostate size, then

    3.If possible infection treat with antibiotics, then

    4.Obtain another PSA test. If elevated again, then

    5.Obtain DCE-MRI or colour doppler ultrasound, then

    6. Avoid a blind biopsy but, if needed, get a targeted biopsy.

    Most Urologists seem to send you off for a biopsy on the slightest elevation as if it is a walk in the park.

    I have just had a biopsy and, as you say, it is not particularly pleasant. I hope your results are favourable. Jay Cohen, in his book 'Prostate Cancer Breakthroughs, a step-by-step approach' extends the list above if you get a positive result.

    All the best.

  • Easton
    Easton

    Posted

    Hey thanks chaps. I had my outcome appointment yesterday and was informed that I have low grade prostate cancer. A gleeson score of 6. It appears that I now have decisions to make. I have an appointment next week with the consultant to discuss treatment options. None of it particularly appeals to me at the moment I have to say! Im realistic, not a reactive person understand its low level and lucky it's been apparently caught out at an early stage. I am young 'ish' and apart from the usual symptoms (peeing through the night etc) actually feel quite well). Advice/ideas on tbis would be great. Thank you for your time.
    • Kombi_Cruiser
      Kombi_Cruiser Easton

      Posted

      Easton...It really sounds like an excellent outcome (if there can be such a thing)...neutral

      I'm taking your reference regards 'none of it particularly appeals' as though you have been given a range of options to consider...???

      If so what are the options so far..??

      It must be a relief... 

    • jnoe97
      jnoe97 Easton

      Posted

      Hi Easton,

      Same thing happened to me 2 weeks ago. I am 57 and have been on testorone therapy for 5 years and testosterone helps cancer grow. First get hit with 'cancer' diagnosis and now my doctor won't prescribe testosterone anymore. It's quite a shock to my system to deal with that. Anyway our prognosis is good, if we have to have cancer this is the kind to have since such a long survival time even without treatment for most guys. I will find another doctor and reduce as much as possible the amount of Testosterone I take. Watchful waiting is what my urologist recomends for "me" with a gleason 6 score.

      All the best to you

    • Easton
      Easton jnoe97

      Posted

      Hey jnoe. Thats a double whammy for you then! Yes I agree we are the fortunate ones I guess with a 6 score. NOT great news but a bit like being hit by a mini rather than a landrover! In now seeing a surgeon and oncolgist next week to discuss treatment options. It may be that I can go active surveillance who knows. However, as in 40's im not sure they will necessarily recommend this looking at others experiences. Hey goodlu k with your tretreatments and heres hoping all will work out.
  • Easton
    Easton

    Posted

    Hey thanks Kombi. Had a discussion with the nurse specialist who informed me about possible treatments immediately after I was given the news. Nothing is set in stone and guess thats why im meeting with the consultant later in the week to see from his perspective. I refer to 'nothing appeals' down to my own research on what treatments are available. Now naturally im not the expert nor do I have any 1st hand experience of pc so I need to be cautious but it does appear that there is potential for considerable side effects ed etc. However, I will be guided by the professional and experinces of others who have been through this. I do feel fortunate that my results are low grade compared to what others have to endure. I will keep you posted to what is discussed.
Back to top

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.