3 month blanking period for ablation success
Posted , 9 users are following.
i had my ablation surgery 2 months ago for afib and a flutter. The worst part of it was the stress leading up to it. The surgery took about 3 hours and I was completely unconscious and felt nothing. Was in the hospital overnight and released the next day. Had a tiny bruise at my groin and nothing more. I've never had any symptoms of afib along with many normal EKGs but a 24-HR halter monitor showed I was in afib 57% of the 24 hour period. I chose to have the surgery to get off medications I was taking. Currently my pulse rate goes from 59 up to 130 at various times during he day. I'm still on Pradaxa and Rythmol. I've been told because of my age and the fact that I have no afib symptoms, i should stay on Pradaxa the rest of my life. Hopefully, if the surgery was successful, I will be able to get off the Rythmol and blood pressure pill. The negative side affects from these medications are fatigue, heartburn and indigestion, dizziness, metallic taste of all food to name a few. I have one month to go before my holster test again to see if surgery was successful. I'm told that the three month wait after ablation is to give scar tissue a chance to form around the blood vessels that had cryo ablation. I'm keeping my fingers crossed hat this works.
0 likes, 20 replies
bill27138 suzanne48640
Posted
I can identify with your pre ablation nerves. I wasnt sure whether I was going through with it and started backing out until my wife calmed me down. I had flutter when I arrived in the lab/theatre so they were able to burn the necessary path away whilst I was concious. Strange sensation having my heart microwaved. The doctor rather took the wind out of my sales by saying that the flutter shouldnt return but it was likely that Afib would happen later. Which after 2 years it has, Im taking betablockers which seem to work. May they continue. I dont recognise any of your meds. Maybe the trade names differ. I'm on Bisopralol, Rivaroxaban and Lostartan. Beta blocker, anticoagulant and bp medication respectively. I too have tiredness and sometimes dizzy spells.
I hope you stay well, and rock steady around 70 bpm.
betty47298 suzanne48640
Posted
suzanne48640 betty47298
Posted
Therefore, staying on blood thinner is imperative. Cryoablation is the newer procedure and the docs seem to think more successful I had my surgery done at Mayo Clinc in Jacksonville,and they are cutting-edge. I suggest you go into the website of the medication(s) you take and it will list all the side affects.
betty47298 suzanne48640
Posted
suzanne48640 betty47298
Posted
betty47298 suzanne48640
Posted
derek76 suzanne48640
Posted
Google, Watchman Device and Amplatzer Amulet,
suzanne48640 betty47298
Posted
suzanne48640 derek76
Posted
My dear mom used to say growing old is not for sisies --she was right!!
derek76 betty47298
Posted
derek76 suzanne48640
Posted
While the drugs stop clots forming we can get brain bleeds instead of clots from them
linda51222 suzanne48640
Posted
how right you are I have seen 3 different consultants and they all said different things about the medication, at present I am on warfarin and bisoporol, I am wanting to get off the warfarin because it interacts badly with the meds I need to look after my bladder condition, I was told that only Pradaxa (Dabigatran) has an antidote, but because of my weight (I am very slim) I was not a good candidate. and should stay with the warfarin.
I also wanted to ask everyone about ablation for or against I find the thought of it quite scary.
L.
simon56380 linda51222
Posted
Am also part of a clinical trial and have had a loop recorder implanted in my chest that constantly montitors me for any arrithmias. Amazing bit of technology.
The recorder has a base station(bit like a cordless phone) that lives under my bed. At 1 am every morning, the recorder "talks" to the base station and the base station transmits data to my cardiologist's computer, via the 3G (mobile phone) network.
So far, so good (fingers crossed).
I did a lot of homework to find out who the best electro physicist in town was. He claimed his team, with their new technique, had an 85% success rate at the 5 year mark PROVIDED I addressed all my risk factors!
So I recommend you do your homework, because there is a variety of similar, but differing ablation techniques, as well as variation in the knowledge and capability of physiologists.
linda51222 simon56380
Posted
for your positive thoughts, its always good to hear other peoples experiences, although as we know we all react differently.
I went last week for a second opinion from a different cardiologist, and her concerns for me with ablation was that because of my small size 46kg I was at higher risk of complications, so plenty to think about.and lots of homework to do.
Thank you
L.
cardiac_congo suzanne48640
Posted