Acute urinary retention.... Need advice on options please.
Posted , 19 users are following.
Hello all,
My husband had a crisis on Saturday night with acute urinary retention, absolutely nothing coming out and left at the mercy of Aand E for several hours in agony. Now home with a catheter, awaiting test results ( PSa etc) and an appt. with a urologist. I am terrified it is cancer but trying not to think about that to much so now throwing myself into researching BPH and our options so we are well informed at our appt. I don't want to accept surgery or strong drugs forever if there are other options.
I would bery very much appreciate any advice from you lovely gents on supporting my husband and any success with alternatives to avoid surgery ( saw palmetto, pumpkin oil etc) .
Maybe be I should mention he is 54 ,in very good health generally but has a ' slow' flow in the mornings for a few years . I am 4 months pregnant with our first long awaited child and need someone to give me a kick up the bum to start thinking positive!!
many thanks in advance for any advice
Ali
0 likes, 134 replies
aliL
Posted
we we had our follow appointment with the GP today. Explained he wanted to self cath so being shown by nurse next week. All bloods kidneys etc came back normal.. No urinary infection showing either.
His is PSa is 6.1..... The DR. was not at all concerned about this.... What do you guys think? Is a PSa of 6.1 to be expected after acute retention,enlarged prostate and a catheter? The GP didn't seem to think a repeat PSa was worth doing all the time he has a catheter which from the advice I've had here seems correct.
We are now waiting for a urologist appointment which we are told could be months..... Thinking of going private for this appointment..... Or maybe we should wait and see what happens after the catheter is removed and rely on PSa? Sorry..... Waffling now.......
thankyou all again and thinking of you today Denis
patrick15755 aliL
Posted
I'd wait and see what happens after the catheter is removed. If your husband can pee OK, then wait for the NHS appointment. If he can't pee then it's worth going private. That's what I did. BUPA on demand could get you an appointment next week, if not sooner - cost £250. Make sure you take your GP's referal letter with you.
aliL patrick15755
Posted
gbhall patrick15755
Posted
Get the catheter out, learn to self-cath as a purely self-defensive option, moderate the intake of this and that, and the chances are excellent that you can wait months for an appointment with a urologist, who will do no more than another PSA test, digital exam, and probably flow-rate test (pee into an electronic urinal), and put him on 'watchfuil waiting'.
Very happy for you so far.
oldbuzzard aliL
Posted
I'd start by getting a self cath lesson and prescription for caths so you can get those spedicaths that everyone likes. He may not need one, depending on what happens when they remove the cath. I had a trip to the ER once when i was totally blockec up, and didn't need to cath again til I had surgery (anasthesia and opiates can lock you up) a year later and not again for another 3 after that.
Given the wait times just to see a urologist, you might want to go private if you can afford it. It could be awhile before you can get any procedure (not familiar with how ti works in the UK). Also, I'd recommend that make sure you see someone who can do Rezum/Urolift or one of the less invasive procedures that don't bring RE as a side effect. He can always do something more extreme if you he doesn't get acceptable results, but at your husband's age with young kids, there is no reason to risk some of the complications the surgical options bring into play unless its a last resort.
oldbuzzard gbhall
Posted
There are many who would disagree with me and I urge you to consider what they say and apply both approaches to your own situation. Only you know what you can afford, how much inconvenience you find acceptable and ultimately what your best option will be.
derek76 aliL
Posted
An initial NHS appointment will lead to another wait for a flow test and a check for retention although some hospitals now do that first and a urology nurse practitioner does the DRE.
I doubt if even the second appointment will include a TRUS (transrectal ultrasonography) or a cystoscopy and it will all drag on before your battle to get the treatment you want starts if it turns out to be required.
I imagine even privately not much would be done at the initial appointment as the Uro would not set anything up until he made his initial diagnosis. A TRUS and a cystoscopy if deemed necessary costs around £1500 at a Spire hospital, a rip off for procedures that only takes a few minutes.
Personally I would wait until you see how he gets on with self cathing. If it is BPH it ain’t urgent but if you take the medication route it leads to side effects and the future fertility problem.
derek76 gbhall
Posted
oldbuzzard derek76
Posted
derek76 oldbuzzard
Posted
Good idea checking your retention by cathing. Not having cathed that did nor occur to me.
stewarta oldbuzzard
Posted
Luckily, the PCa was confined to the prostate, and the nerve bundle on one side was left intact. I am not on any post-op treatments or medications, and back to physical activity and a few red wines when it suits.
In summary, pay the price of a 3T MRI, and stop all the guesswork about why your husband cannot urinate.
aliL stewarta
Posted
We we really do not have the money for an MRI and I am now terrified!!
oldbuzzard aliL
Posted
aliL oldbuzzard
Posted
I was going to talk to hubby about trying to find the money for an MRI privately but......
I have heard that too much testing find things that are then treated that may well be better left alone as they like you say never cause a problem? How do you gents with BPH make the decision not to get throughly tested for PC?
derek76 aliL
Posted
Personally I think that you are over reacting and that his sudden retention was caused by his night out. If your GP suspected PC he would have fast tracked your husband to a urology appointment. In circumstances like that he can have you seen in two weeks.
Testing?? I had a scan on my gall bladder that was OK but it found a 3.1 cm Aortic Aneurysm, many harmless cysts on my liver and four on my right kidney that are growing but I'm told are harmless.
Now I have scans every year on the aneurysm that in 14 years has only grown to 3.7 cm but makes travel insurance a problem as they don’t understand that in this case size matters.
gbhall stewarta
Posted
Now his wife has reported her husbands slowing of flow over a period of time, AND a very stong reason for sudden retention. The gentleman took an antihistamin for a known allergy to red meat, then immediately went out and ate some, along with five pints of alcohol.
Everyone on here knows the typical result of antihistamine and alcohol will be acute retention if there is even minor flow restriction.
So on balance everything is explained with no reason to expect any worse problems than most men have to put up with ageing and raising anxiety is unfounded.
aliL gbhall
Posted
Derek76..... Thankyou also ..... Your reply has given me a good slap back to common sense. I appreciate you all holding my hand through this and will try to stay calm!
Ali
derek76 aliL
Posted
Which part of the country do you live in as some are very backward in their urology thinking.
Where we are the local hospital only offered me TUMP ot TURP and were anti Laser. I insisted they refer me to an other area where one of the countries top two urologists consulted. At that time he felt that my prostate symptoms were not too bad.
Some time later I got a locum urologist at the local hospital and he expressed amazement at their attitude and told me that Mr X had been doing laser surgery at the hospital for years and referred me to him.
aliL derek76
Posted
The GP did gulp a bit when I told him that weren't happy thinking of a Turp as we may not have finished our family( all the other reasons as well but thought that would hit home the hardest) ...... I am not sure if that would qualify my husband for a Urolift or PAE on he NHS or not?
oldbuzzard aliL
Posted
If he's fine and has a reasonbly normal flow now, I'm not sure I'd even recommend PAE or one of the other less invasive procedures. Someone has problems even with a 2% chance. I set a length of time on cath record for Rezum patients and I'm otherwise perfectly healthy. Don't as for trouble where none exists.
Good luck - if things aren't good when the cath comes out, or if they regress soon, then I'd see a urologist, pay if you can/.have to and look into PAE/Uorolift/Rezum.
gbhall aliL
Posted
derek76 gbhall
Posted
When I inquired about heart valve surgery they even said that they would match any other prices elsewhere and do it the next week. In the end I waited for the NHS.
arlington aliL
Posted
I think PAE is the most promising; however, so that you go in with eyes wide open I wanted to let you know that there is a possibility of embolization of the seminal vesicle - so my doc, just before the procedure, asked me if i still wanted to have children!
stewarta aliL
Posted
ES28567 aliL
Posted
aliL gbhall
Posted
aliL oldbuzzard
Posted
aliL stewarta
Posted
aliL ES28567
Posted
derek76 aliL
Posted
How you have the PCA3 test
The test is in two parts. You have a rectal examination and then a urine test.
You need to have a rectal examination because this massages the prostate gland and helps the PCA3 to go into the urine. You have to give the urine sample straight after the rectal examination. You normally get the results within a few days.
aliL derek76
Posted
I've also sent to a message thanking you for all the very helpful links you have sent me..... But thanks again!
Ali