Almost total loss of glans sensitivity following circumcision
Posted , 5 users are following.
I had to be circumcised in adulthood after severe phimosis - the eventual result of penile abuse as a boy (but that's only relevant to the cause of my problem now).
Soon after the surgery wound had healed and I could masturbate, my then permanently exposed glans (head) was almost painfully sensitive, making ejaculation far too fast and therefore unsatisfying. Sexual intercourse was equally unsatisfactory.
But now there is NO sensation left other than applied pressure. I have even experimented by pouring very hot water, then icy water over my glans - and there was no difference. But doing the same on the shaft and I recoiled! I was shocked.
Very sadly, I can't have my foreskin back again. So my question is twofold:
1. Is there anything I can do to retrieve even a modicum of glans sensitivity back again - without the lengthy and tiresome act of foreskin 'restoration' which can never give me back it's fine-touch nerve endings?
2. How can I effectively masturbate and achieve a full & lasting erection, as I used to with a foreskin? It's a learning curve I'm still struggling with. After much effort I can ejaculate but my penis is only half erect. - and that's no use in the act of sexual intercourse. I don't even wake up with 'morning wood' anymore.
At least we thankfully don't routinely circumcise our little boys, as the USA still does to this day. A circumcised penis is a crippled penis - believe me!
0 likes, 6 replies
archemedes Islay
Posted
Islay archemedes
Posted
lawrence63489 Islay
Posted
Most men who're cut were cut at birth and don't know that they are sexually dysfunctional. Most , even if they know deep down, will not admit they have been harmed due to pride/ego. IT's a coping mechanism. Even after being cut, you seem to think the glans is the primary erogenous tissue. This is a folk theory with no basis in science. The foreskin is the primary erogenous organ.
Islay lawrence63489
Posted
But as you may remember (even when 14 years old), the glans does retain intense sensitivity - until its soft and malleable surface dries out and keranitises.
Meatal stenosis is a further complication from circumcision which I suffered. I hope you were spared that very unnerving condition and it's invasive treatment.
Christopher
lawrence63489 Islay
Posted
Even the claim the glans clitoris is the pleasure hub of the female , is another folk theory. As far as I'm aware, there's no neurological evidence of this.
My glans was never pleasurable. The pleasure you got was from your ridged band, frenular delta and frenulum. The amount of pleasure a cut man has left is directly proportional to how much of these structures are left. Most circumcisions are periah style and remove them all.
Islay lawrence63489
Posted
But it does. It's designed to act this way. If it was not, then there's no point in a natural/normal penis for sexual intercourse. It's the very action of a sliding foreskiin back and forth within a vagina that gives both the woman and the man so much pleasure.
Compare this with the 'jackhammer' action needed by a circumcised man to bring himself to climax when having sex. The difference is as chalk from cheese. And the loser is not only him but his partner too.
I have lost almost every vistage of erotic sensual touch to my glans. But the act of genital touch is inexorably intwined in human experience, and I still have my frenulum.
The same is true of you. Be us both circumcised, we can do no more than make the best of what we have - a crippled penis.
I will PM you before long.
Christopher