Am due to have my 3rd Turp in June. Should I suggest having prostate removed. Am a 75 yr old.
Posted , 8 users are following.
My Prostate has over 3 years become enlarged. Have already had 2 Turps. At 75 not worried about ejaculations.
0 likes, 20 replies
mark23925 robin25259
Posted
roger100c mark23925
Posted
The idea of having the prostate toally removed and the consequences suffered by "caringbah"'s father-in-law sound awful so I wouldn't want to go there!
robin25259 roger100c
Posted
caringbah robin25259
Posted
My father in law had his prostate removed and he became a shadow of his former self. From then on he just wanted to sleep all day and just withered away.
If you're worried about enlargement you should check out the Prostate Artery Embolisation (PAE) threads on this site. I had a PAE done and it shrunk my prostate by a third.
Dont ask your urologist about it because they can't do it. Have a look at the PAE thread . There is a lot of useful information there. PAE's are done by Interventional Radiologists not urologists. A urologist will most likely try to talk you out of a PAE because they can't do them. Don't listen to them.
Removing your prostate will change your life for the worse. Don't do it!
robin25259 caringbah
Posted
caringbah robin25259
Posted
Why don't you give them a call and see what they can do fo you?
I know now that you're not interested in the sexual side of things but I'm talking quality of life issues. My father in law went backwards very quickly when he had his prostate removed.
I'm not saying he was typical...I don't know but I wouldn't want to go through what he did.
caringbah
Posted
I would encourage you to check out other less invasive ways of reducing your prostate size.
Sydney is only a few hours away from NZ.
I think I've said enough otherwise I'll just be repeating myself.
robin25259 caringbah
Posted
Pepasan robin25259
Posted
You say you're not worried about ejaculations, but what about erections? My understanding is that nerve-sparing surgical techniques are very skilled and can never be guaranteed, so often complete removal risks virtually no sexual functioning. If that's OK too, then in your position, I would be tempted to at least discuss the chances of complete removal, which would also have the advantage of eliminating future risk of cancer the the gland itself. Wishing you well, Peter
robin25259 Pepasan
Posted
Pepasan robin25259
Posted
robin25259 Pepasan
Posted
caringbah Pepasan
Posted
oldbuzzard robin25259
Posted
I'm not sure what's available where you live or are close to, but I'd opt for something like PAE or Rezum every year or two rather then remove my prostate. Lots of me opt for other things even with cancer - so forewarned is forearmed.
robin25259 oldbuzzard
Posted
caringbah robin25259
Posted
Most doctors have never heard of PAE. Your surgeon probably has not heard of it either.
Askng a surgeon whether you should have surgery is like asking an insurance salesman whether you should have insurance.
Anyway mate, it's your choice and you have to live with the consequences of whatever you choose.
All the best.
robin25259 caringbah
Posted