ankle replacement or ankle fusion?
Posted , 5 users are following.
Hello
Im a 37 year old with ankle athritis, just had ayear ago an ankle distraction but it didjt work for me, so now i have to decide between a fusion or a TAR.
I dont really want to have it fused so i would love to talk to someone who have had the same problem and what decision they made and how are they feeling now.
Thank you all!
0 likes, 6 replies
RichardKen blackbird80
Posted
If you plan on a TAR it is essential that the surgeon has done a lot of recent successful TAR surgeries. Do not go with someone with less experience as you are very likely to suffer and a revision is going to require considerably more experience.A fusion is far more straight forward and requires less experience.
I'm speaking as someone who had a TAR that five years later had to be revised. I'm twelve weeks post revision.
Cheers Richard
blackbird80 RichardKen
Posted
Morrismanc007 blackbird80
Posted
For me it was an easy choice to make as nothing more could be offered, my ankle was too bad. To be honest the fusion was my 7th op and I had had enough of ortho surgery, I wanted a few yrs of ortho free intervention.
I think that Richard is right, if you go for a TAR then find a surgeon that knows his/her stuff. My consultant has done a lot of them but always says he wouldn’t offer it as an op to younger patients until the operation is a little more established; a bit like hip replacements are now established and are routinely offered to younger patients.
I’d say read up, know your stuff, be fully informed of the pros and cons as there are these with any surgery. Find a decent surgeon and talk everything through with him/her.
Hope everything goes well for you.
Claire. Xx
blackbird80 Morrismanc007
Posted
amanda91058 blackbird80
Posted
david31086 blackbird80
Posted