Any experience/info about the AcuFocus IC-8 IOL?
Posted , 13 users are following.
Seems like this IOL (which functions like the Kamra inlay) is getting great results in Europe and elsewhere and will hopefully be coming to the US in the next year or two. Sounds like it could be as good of an option as the EDoFs but without all the nighttime issues of glare and halos like my Symfony has. Makes me wonder if it would be worth swapping out my Symfony for this and getting the recommended distance monofocal in my dominant eye. Thoughts?
0 likes, 29 replies
at201 john56935
Posted
Everyone can see objects over an increased range by looking through a pin hole, but I am not sure if I would want my IOL to provide that pin hole effect.
at201
Posted
And I will also be curious to know what an ophthalmologist will think of a person with the AcuFocus lens, whose eyes can't be dilated enough during an eye examination for him/her to check the retina etc as well as it should be.
john56935 at201
Posted
Yes, I was thinking both things but apparently it doesn't prevent them from seeing the retina and performing other procedures. The information I have seen is that the reduced light is only noticeable when it is compared to the other eye but that binocular vision is fine. I would like to hear the experiences of people that got the Kamra inlay as that works the same way as the IOL, especially if the reduced light is bothersome at night.
jimluck at201
Posted
Patient satisfaction with it is high, so I infer the issue you identify is minor.
jimluck at201
Posted
Doctors who have implanted it say it is no impediment to examination and procedures. It's best to keep an open mind until you see the evidence on a device you are unfamiliar with.
Guest john56935
Posted
I am also experiencing lots of glare and starbursts and am considering having it changed for the IC-8.
I cannot find any patient reviews of this lens only clinical trial results which is a bit strange.
Have you found any patient reviews?
Tom
john56935 Guest
Posted
at201 john56935
Posted
Thus, the additional benefit in day light due to Acufocus IC-8 IOLwill be minimal, if any.
jimluck john56935
Posted
If you google -- patient.info ic-8 Guest -- it will pull up a review from 4 years ago. Excerpts:
"I have had a Symfony toric lens exchanged for an Acufocus IC-8 about 4 weeks ago in the UK and the result is much better."
"can read from 12 inches and see well to distant hills"
Night-Hawk john56935
Posted
Couldn't a contact lens be created that gives a pinhole effect?
That would seem to be a better solution if someone wanted that effect but could easily be removed when needed.
john56935 Night-Hawk
Posted
That's really good question, not sure why they insert into the cornea instead of just use a contact lens. I will try to remember to ask the doc when I see him in 2 weeks
jantje32476 john56935
Posted
Kamra inlay is 3.8 mm in diameter (about 1/4 the size of a soft contact lens) and 6.0µm thick.
IC-8 IOL has a total diameter of 3.23mm, a thickness of 5.0µm and 3,200 microperforations.
Karma corneal inlay surgery left one's natural lens untouched. It is considered a non-invasive procedure and reversible.
IC-8 IOL is implanted to replace the aging lens of a cataract patient. May be more suitable for people with small capsular bags ... unless it is sitting on top of another lens.
For comparison purposes, TECNIS Symfony IOL has an overall diameter of 13.0mm, with an optical zone of 6.0mm
at201 jantje32476
Posted
Thus, Karma (3.8 mm dia) as well as IC-8 IOL (3.23 mm dia) are not expected to have much effect on the quality of the day time vision.
jantje32476 at201
Posted
jimluck jantje32476
Posted
IC-8 is no different in size than TECNIS Symfony.