benefits of Methotrexate
Posted , 12 users are following.
I am hoping there are a few people on this Forum who could advise me as to begin taking Methotrexate, or not.
It was put to me to possibly try this method to be able to get me off Prednisone.
I remember reading about people on this Forum who are on it, or have in the past used it.
I did some research on Methotrexate and it sounds just as frightening as Prednisone, though it was explained to me you only take a weekly dose instead of daily.
I am thinking it might be better to stay with the Devil you know than the one you don't know.
I have been down to 2mg Pred. though could not stay this low for long, am now back up to 5mg, it has taken me over 3 years to reach these levels.
thanking you, Track
0 likes, 18 replies
r.d.s26296 track
Posted
My Rheumatologist recommended that I take methotrexate....firstly she said it will help me reduce the prednisone without pains.
I have not taken it yet as I'm not at all happy with taking two rather drastic medications at once.
Also it takes about three months for methotrexate to kick in.
Eileen has had a negative reaction to methotrexate and I really trust her judgement..
Which is the worse of the two evils, well after reading, I think methotrexate takes first prize.
r.d.s26296
Posted
I'm at 18mg after starting 25mg four months ago.
track r.d.s26296
Posted
Decided to stay with Prednisone.
Track
EileenH track
Posted
I don't know why doctors give patients the impression that methotrexate will get them off pred. There is no guarantee of that at all - it doesn't often replace pred althought it MAY allow you to manage on a lower dose of pred. Any doctor who is suggesting you take it when on 5mg is crackers IMHO - this is already a low physiological dose which is doing no harm at all. This is relatively new work about duration of PMR (median 5.9 years, not two) and the lack of the so-called pred effects - an age-matched population not on pred had them too!
https://www.practicalpainmanagement.com/resources/news-and-research/polymyalgia-rheumatica-steroid-side-effects-new-findings
As much a limiting factor as anything now is your adrenal function which will have to return too. I also found a 2001 article about using long term low dose pred to manage RA - low dose, below 10mg, is afe and well tolerated. The concept is the same even if the disease isn't.
The study that many doctors take as "mtx works" done by an Italian group did a 5-year follow-up and found that while patients had been able to take slightly less pred over a year, at 5 years their long term "pred side effects" were no different. So why bother????
You may only take mtx once a week - but believe me, the side effects can last all week! I took it this summer for 4 weeks - I was going to stop for a couple of weeks after that anyway to travel but I refused to start it again. I took it Sat night and Sun morning just in case I felt bad for the first couple of days as many people report. The first week wasn't too bad - no nausea so I thought, oh that's a good start then. But about mid-week I had a headache which lasted until Fri evening (I never have headaches). The one thing I noticed the first week was it felt as if the so-called pred side effects were increased: sweats were back, I was hungry all the time (again, never usually). And I felt as if I had diarrhoea, not bad but I was very unhappy being far from a toilet, and slight indigestion - I never have that! The second week those things were worse and I itched slightly all over, My hair was falling out in small tufts. I started to feel more tired than usual. I take an anticoagulant - I started to bruise more. I'm sure there were other things but they escape me just now! Over the following 2 weeks all this increased and the fatigue became overwhelming. After I stopped mtx it took about a week for that to improve - but I was able to travel to Seoul which I couldn't have the previous week. It is now about 6 weeks since I stopped taking it - my hair is not falling out as much - normal single hairs now, not in tufts of 10 hairs as it was.
I have a PMR friend, involved in the charity, who was on mtx for a few years. She had no adverse effects at all but only managed to reduce her dose by a couple of mg to about 7mg I think. Last year she and her rheumy decided to try leflunomide - and in 8 months she did get off pred, she says she "felt it kick in". I have wondered a few times if she really had "PMR". I think most doctors would say the leflunomide side effects are worse than mtx and my rheumy certainly didn't suggest it, as I'd had diarrhoea with mtx I think he thought leflunomide would be worse, it had been mentioned previously.
I haven't time to say more just now - I will if you want me to.
track EileenH
Posted
I found the New Findings you attached very interesting rePMR and steriod side effects.
Your wisdom is much appreciated on this Forum not only from myself but from many others, who you have helped along the way.
Take care,
BillyP track
Posted
Including...….
MTX With Folic Acid....
Plaquenel…….
Salazopyrin……
But for me , they all made me as sick as a dog, with diffrent other side effects...….
Yet my brother in law just loves his MTX...… so there you go...………
The thing is, some of these meds may help you lower your pred, and you really dont know
how it will effect you till you try using it...…….it may suit you where it did not like me one little bit.
For me , it is pred ONLY....
ClaireJG BillyP
Posted
My sister-in-law loves her mtx too. Not for me, although it hasn't been offered to me... yet! I overheard a medical colleague who works with patients with inflammatory bowel disease say that he thought it was a dreadful drug and he'd never take it. Enough said!
EileenH BillyP
Posted
track BillyP
Posted
Taking all in what you and others have writen I will be better off staying with the Prednisone.
My Doctor was not pushing it, he said to think about it, it was up to me to make up my mind.
thanks once again,
T
Daniel1143 track
Posted
track Daniel1143
Posted
reading all comments on the subject I have decided to shut it down as well.
T
Anhaga Daniel1143
Posted
koen1 track
Posted
The current guideline by the NIH for GCA mentions that if there are several flare-ups when on pred only, someone has a 40% chance of beneficial effect of MTX. If MTX does not work one can try Actemra.
After my 3rd flare-up in May my rheumy and I decided to try MTX, because I had been taking over 19,000mg of cumulative pred by then. My rheumy expected that I would soon find out if there were negative side effects and also if I found benefits. I had low expectations, but to my surprise I was able to notice no side effects and after about a week I did start feeling better. Less fatigue, no pain in my hands, no headache, but most remarkably, very stable morning temperature. I have been recording my temp reading every morning at 6 AM, when I take my pred. If I'm doing well the temp is 36.6C. Before MTX, it would fluctuate between 36.6 and 37.2. The days with the slightly higher temp would coincide with more fatigue, sweat, pain in hands etc. Since my start on MTX in June I have had only one day with 36.7C, a couple of days with 36.5 and 36.4, for the rest every morning is a boring 36.6C. And I have not felt so good in the past two years. I have gone from 50mg pred in May to 20mg now.
I realize that this does not prove anything, since the last two flares happened around 15mg pred. I still have to see what will happen when I get to those values again, but I feel a lot more robust. I hope that with MTX I will be able to get well below 10mg and then go very slow until cured of this nasty disease.
Also, maybe I would have felt better without the MTX as well. You never know for sure.
But even without hard proof I think that the NIH guideline might be right and that indeed for 40% there are real benefits in this very low cost medication.
The only drawback of the MTX has been that I had to completely stop alcohol consumption. And I like my glass of wine with dinner and a beer when thirsty. To my surprise, I did find excellent non-alcoholic beer.
EileenH koen1
Posted
My rheumy thinks it is worth trying because he has had good experiences with it - but he agrees with me that when it causes side effects it isn't worth it for the sake of a few mg. I do really well PMR-wise at 8mg, 7mg too, the problems that come at 7mg are due to increased atrial fibrillation. So on that basis I'm on a low risk dose of pred, albeit for a long time.
So my view for a couple of years now has been that it is worth trying - and if, like you, it doesn't cause problems then all good and well. My side effects the first week weren't too bad either and had they stayed the same maybe I'd still be taking it - but they didn't, they increased.
By the way - the manufacturers data sheet says the occasional drink won't harm and up to 14 units a week is mentioned somewhere. Non-alcoholic beer has improved a lot in the last couple of years. Unfortunately the same doesn't apply to wine!!!!
koen1 EileenH
Posted
I totally agree with you on the non-alcoholic wine. Almost undrinkable. I tried several different brands.
For me it was easier to go completely without alcohol. I tried the non-alcoholic wine, since I make my own wine. I wanted to see if it was worthwhile to get a small still and remove the alcohol from my own wine. Definitely not worth it. So I will leave my wine to age, which is normally difficult for me And the beer is great. Seems they are able to just remove the alcohol and a lot of calories and leave the taste! Good combination for me.
EileenH koen1
Posted
koen1 EileenH
Posted
EileenH koen1
Posted
I think they really started the trend to alcohol-free beers - probably more enthusiasm on the part of the brewers because I don't think advertising of alcohol is allowed at sporting events. Alcohol-free is fine and enthusiastically advertised by sports stars!!!