Benign prostatic hyperplasia and Tamsulosin
Posted , 15 users are following.
Hi. My husband suffered urinary retention for the first time just over two weeks ago. He was seen in A & E and urine drained via catheter. Went home that morning with the catheter which filled with blood so back to A&E where they decided he needed a larger catheter and bladder washout. He was admitted for one night. He was discharged and told appointment would be made. However the next day we saw a urologist privately who explained what he thought the problem was and ordered blood tests plus PSA and ultrasound. He also started him on antibiotics and Tamsulosin. Tamsulosin had a very quick good effect with his peeing.
When we saw the consultant again last week he said the PSA was 1 point something and blood tests and scan OK. He has suggested he continues with the Tanmsulosin and considers TURP. We've put that on the back burner for now but what really worries me : is he likely to have further retention or do the tablets prevent this. I think I worry more than he does as it was such a shock!
Thanks for any help.
0 likes, 43 replies
Pepasan Barneybear
Posted
After a couple of episodes of retention, I've learned to use an intermittent catheter. I take it with me on journeys and holidays so that if ever I experience full retention again, I can relieve the problem myself without having to go to A & E. I find this very reassuring.
Motto Pepasan
Posted
Pepasan Motto
Posted
It's less uncomfortable than when a nurse puts a catheter in - more control and 'feel' for how and when to push, and when not, as it goes in. Uncomfortable at first, but when done a few times it's possible to get quite used to it.
Barnie Barneybear
Posted
and live with without complication. so please dont worry !!
bernard68450 Barneybear
Posted
derek76 Barneybear
Posted
Beware of Tamsulosin as it causes sexual problems. He might be better with one a day Cialis.
When I asked our practise nurse what is the most complained about drug she said Tamsulosin. I sad yes by men but she replied No, by their wives.
Another warning if he was prescribed Cipro or a Fluoquinolone drug, look up the latest warning on it by the European Medicines Agency or the American FDA
derek76 Barneybear
Posted
joseph34828 Barneybear
Posted
Barneybear joseph34828
Posted
He did have an ultrasound Joseph. and when we saw the urologists for he results I think he said there was 35 mls residual of urine. Might have got that wrong. I expect he will confirm in his letter but think he is on holiday so there is nothing forthcoming at the moment. It looks as though there are alternatives to TURP but hopefully we can wait for a while. Oh I forgot to say that when we were seen in A&E they thought the retention had been caused by constipation and strong painkillers for a back condition although he'd only been taking those for a day or so.
Motto Barneybear
Posted
joseph34828 Barneybear
Posted
Did the ultrasound show that the median lobe had become large and protruding into the bladder neck?
If so, surgery is what is needed. Check out the HoLEP Procedure. I don't think that PAE procedure would reduce the growth if it's there already.
hank1953 Barneybear
Posted
derek76 Barneybear
Posted
lester19220 Barneybear
Posted
Motto Barneybear
Posted
These Neanderthal URO's always seem recommend TURP as mine did. He said he didn't think the more minimally invasive procedures get as good a result. It's the "gold standard." Well, before you drill a hole in me, I'm going to try something and I am exploring the PAE. I would try FLA next as well.