Biopsy
Posted , 9 users are following.
Following a relapse when reducing meds, and with my markers rising again my GP sent me to the Rheumy, she now wants me to have a arterial biopsy and a brain mri. Initially I was diagnoes with GCA via an ulstrasound which showed inflamation. Also have the PMR. So off I went to the vascular surgeon who after looking at all my med records agreed with the diagnosis and went on to tell me that in his experience he has not found the biopsy always confirms the diagnosis especially when I have already started the prednisone, been on it for 3months and am on 45 per day at the moment, but still have pain in my left temple and the creepiness in my scalp. In his opinion with studies that he has done of the procedure he has carried out there is only a 10% chance that the biopsy will confirm GCA. He spoke to my rheumy and she still wants me to have it, I have sent her message to reconsider, with no reply. So I am now booked in for this procedure this Tuesday, I have almost decided not to do it, but would love to hear others experiences on this. The Rheumy's reasoning for wanting this is that as I am not responding too well with the reduction in meds, she wants to add some other medication to the mix to help. Thanks Sharon
0 likes, 12 replies
Sheilamac_Fife sharon61808
Posted
My feeling is they are panicking too soon. If the inflammation is still there, you can't reduce. The GCA and PMR are in charge, not you and certainly not the docs. They take their own time to fade away. There are no textbook rules around reduction schedules except that it shouldn't be more than 10% at a time and you need to settle on the new dose long enough to make sure it is ok. And if it's not, you slip back up to where you were last comfortable.
Hopefully one of the experts will be along to advise you soon.
Good Luck in your journey!
sharon61808 Sheilamac_Fife
Posted
iellen32 sharon61808
Posted
You are under professional care and getting the support you need now.
Sharon, I wish you the best outcome.
Everything will be in your favor.
Keep your best positive attitude and your hope alive.
xxxxxx🌸
nick67069 sharon61808
Posted
sharon61808 nick67069
Posted
maureen63465 sharon61808
Posted
sharon61808 maureen63465
Posted
JanSP sharon61808
Posted
sharon61808 JanSP
Posted
snapperblue sharon61808
Posted
If anything, assuming it is done right, the ultrasound may be better than a biopsy because it samples a larger area. Does the GP have a problem with the ultrasound?
A positive result on the biopsy can confirm a diagnosis, but a negative result tells you nothing. You can have inflammation in another part of the artery that was not present in the piece the surgeon removed. Or, as surgeon pointed out, the prednisone may have reduced the giant cells so they are not detected.
You still have the symptoms of GCA, right? Is your GP driven by a goal of reducing your dose of prednisone? I have PMR, so I am not aware of the dose and duration typical in GCA, but your GP might just want you to get off prednisone to avoid real side effects, but sooner than you should given your GCA.
sharon61808 snapperblue
Posted
beatrice74480 sharon61808
Posted