Cataract Surgery Just Completed - Sharing My Experience - PanOptix Tri-focal

Posted , 30 users are following.

I was a lurker for awhile before I registered and started posting.Just had my cataract surgery done (Right eye one week ago, and Left eye yesterday).

Thought I'd share my experience. To avoid wall of text, I’ll break it up into separate posts (which won’t all come today). Areas I'll cover include:

  • Background
  • Choice of IOL
  • Laser vs Traditional Surgery
  • Surgery Experience
  • Post Surgery Experience
  • Follow-up with occasion longer term updates

10 likes, 103 replies

103 Replies

Prev Next
  • Posted

    SHORT-TERM POST SURGERY and NEUROADAPTATION OBSERVATIONS

    After the surgery, my pupils were still be dilated, so vision will be “weird” initially.

    Next day, follow-up check with the eye surgeon. Test showed my distance vision was already 20/20. Wonderful! But my intermediate and near vision is quite fuzzy.Docotr noted that my pupils were still dilated the day after, so she was not surprised intermediate and near vision still fuzzy and said it would improve. With tri-focals it's normal fpr distance vision to improve first.

    The PanOptix lens has both a UV filter (this is standard) and a blue light filter (several manufacturers have added this as they think it may help reduce risk of macular disease, while some other manufacturers don’t believe blue filter is beneficial). I compared the colors I see with my new Right eye (which has the IOL) with my left eye (still natural lens but with cataracts). I don’t notice any perceptible difference in color, except when looking at my wood deck is pressure treated wood with a semi-transparent still. With my left eye (natural lens with cataract), the wood has a more yellowish hue compared to my Right eye (IOL with blue filter), but difference is not major.

    I have my left eye done the following week.Distance vision now with both eye is outstanding. Intermediate is getting better, but still fuzzy, and near is fuzzy (after one week in first eye and a couple of days in second eye). My surgeon says it can take one week to three months to adjust for the near vision. I did buy some reading glasses with the lowest power (+1.00) but will try not to use them too much (why later).

    My exchange of posts with Danish Viking led me to look up articles on neuroadaptation and found some old articles that were informative. The articles are from before tri-focal were invented, but with tri-focals the brain is seeing three images, one that is focused and two that are unfocussed. The brain adapts to filter out the noise so that you can hopefully see clearly at all distances.

    Search for: “New Lens, Same Brain: The Importance of Neuroadaptation” -- very old article, so much of it may not apply, but info of neuroadaptation is good.

    And the next one I found really helpful and am trying out some of the suggestions:

    Search: “Multifocal Neuroadaptation: Can Training Help the Brain?”

    I only read this article this morning, but I’ve tired some of the training including eye exercises and looking at “Gabor Filter” images. I am sure I’m not imagining it, but my intermediate and near vision seems to be a little better already. I will do more of the eye “training” , and will try to avoid relying on temporary readers to speed up my neuroadaptation.

    Also purchased my first pair of Maui Jim sunglasses, now that I don't need prescription lens anymore!

    • Posted

      Many typos in above are because intermediate and near vision still fuzzy! But getting better.

    • Posted

      one more good article: "Understanding of neural adaptation may lead to better vision correction"

      Discusses adaptation to aberrations as well.

      Article also mentions Neuro Vision training. I haven't purchased any training apps yet (don't know if I will or not), but have looked at some "Gabor Patch" images online.

    • Posted

      Thank you for your in-depth post: very helpful to read your decision-making process and experience.

      I too have looked into Gabor patches to help resolve halos and ghosting/glare. In case you're interested, I found an app for Android called Extreme Eyes that is just a video game using Gabor patches. I don't know if the progression of the exercises matters: if it does, then those expensive courses might be better. But I'll stick with the free app and take whatever improvement comes.

    • Posted

      Thanks for your post Tamarinda.

      I actually did read your older post about the Extreme Eye Exercises app, and found the app on both Android and IOS. Downloaded late last week and have tried it a few times. Thanks for pointing out this free app!Looks like the developers haven't done updating (not sure how they make any money, as I don't see any links to paid apps or ads). But it's free!

      While the basics are easy to understand, what is "best time" (or in other words, when does the game end?). Does the game end when you have matched a certain number?

    • Posted

      Haha I have NO idea. I just do it for 20 minutes. To be honest, I found another article that was a bit more rigorous that didn't show a clear benefit. But I figure it doesnt hurt and I have always liked that kind of game anyhow.

    • Posted

      One of the developers of a paid app had to pay a fine to the FTC as they could not back up their claims.While another one was not as aggressive in their claims and hasn't had any regulatory issues.

      I won't be able to tell if doing these help, or if just passage of time is what's important. But as you said, it's free and can't hurt.

  • Posted

    hi janus381, thanks for sharing your experience with PanOptix. i live in Toronto as well. Are you able to share the clinic and surgeon you used?

    • Posted

      I went to Boechner Eye Institute and Dr. Gilani.

      Optometrist first suggested Kensington Eye Institute, and said most of the hospital eye surgeons also work there , but Kensignton is better than the hospitals with booking appointments. But I mentioned Boechner casually and the optometrist commented right away Boechner could do laser touch-ups or adjustments if needed.

      I had mentioned Boechner because my wife's was looking into refractive lens exchange (at her optometrist's suggestions) starting about 5 years ago as she was starting to have periodic issues with her oontacts.She took a couple of years looking into options and went to three of the top private clinics for consultations, and was most comfortable with Boechner. Boechner also told her that she could do regular laser surgery instead of refractive lens exchange, while the other two said refractive lens exchange (more expensive) was the only option. She had laser surgery done with Dr. Stein and is very pleased with results.

      I asked for optometrist referral to Boechner and also to the Toronto operation of NVision (as another well known doctor - Dr. Machat was at NVision).But NVision decided to close down the Toronto office just before my consultation, so I just went with Boechner.

      At Boechner, I chose Dr. Gilani.I was thinking of asking for Dr. Stein, but because he is the famous one, I would have had to wait till 2020 for surgery with Dr. Stein and I realized my vision was bad enough now that I didn't want to wait till 2020. Dr. Gilani is of course much younger, so she wouldn't have had tens of thousands of cataract surgeries behind her, but her credentials are very impressive. She is also not just a general phthamlogist, but is also a retina specialist working at the Toronto Retina institute.So I felt very confident in her training and the fact that she is also a retina specialist was an added bonus.Dr. Stein and Dr. Gilani do discuss cases (for example she mentioned that Dr. Stein agreed that a toric lens rather than limbal relaxing incisions was the better option for my left eye). I'm very happy with Dr. Gilani. She asked if I wanted to see her or my optometrist for my next follow-up in one month -- Optometrist or Ophthalmologist who is also a Retina Specialist for next appointment - pretty easy choice!Don't know for sure, but I suspect Dr. Stein, being more booked up, would have sent me back to my Optometrist for the one-month check.

    • Posted

      Thanks for the detailed reply and for sharing your experiences. I had gone to see Dr Stein at Bochner but he was very abrupt and distracted during the consult. I did not feel comfortable going with him. I subsequently went to see Dr Khan at Clarity Eye. I felt comfortable with him. He presented PanOptix as an option. I asked if I could speak a patient who has had PanOptix put in but they could not set up a ref. My cataracts are not very bad so I decided to wait. I'm glad I found this thread and thanks again for sharing.

    • Posted

      Coincidence, but Dr. Gilani is also listed on the Clarity Eye Institute page as one of retina and cataract doctors. And Dr. Chow from Clarity is one of the directors of Toronto Retina Institute. Dr. Khan's credentials are very impressive.

      I was very happy with Dr. Gilani's manner and communication. I suspect Gilani will be doing more and more of her Cataract and Laser surgery work at Bochner in the future, as she is featured pretty prominently on the Bochner site now.

  • Posted

    1-2 Weeks Update

    It’s been two weeks since surgery in my right eye, and one week for my left eye.

    My right eye was measured 20/20 for distance at the follow-up check the day after surgery.Intermediate and near vision was very fuzzy the day after, and doctor said my pupils were still dilated.After my left eye was done the following week, my intermediate and near vision still had not adjusted, so I purchased +1.00 power reading glasses and I could read my phone with that; trying not to use the readers too often. My ophthalmologist reassured me that for the Tri-focal, it’s normal for distance vision to be the first to improve, and the other distances will normally take one week to 3 months to adjust.

    As I write today, I am extremely pleased with my distance vision with PanOptix IOL in both eyes. Since I’ve had glasses most of my wife, I don’t think I ever had crystal clear distance vision. My intermediate and near vision has improved. I can read my computer screen (but words are slightly fuzzy), and I can read documents and my phone if font is not too small. For newspapers, I need to use my temporary reading glasses. Still early days, but happy to be seeing improvements, and expect to have even better vision at intermediate and near as I my brain adapts to these lens.

    Artifacts

    I’m not seeing any artifacts in daylight or indoors; no artifacts watching TV or looking at the computer. Also no short-term sensitivity to sunlight (although I'm loving my new Maui Jim sunglasses!).

    Before I knew I had cataracts, I was thinking over 30% of the cars on the road had bright high-beams on at night, when what was really happening was that I was having significant glare due to cataracts. After cataract surgery, I not having much problems with on-coming headlights. There are a few cars that probably do have high beams or misaligned headlights that bother me a bit (but not as much as before), but in general, no problems with glare.

    I am seeing two very faint concentric rings around some lights. I see it more with red traffic lights and tail lights. That is clearly an artifact from the lens, but it’s very mild, and does not impair my night vision.

    I am not sure a light should look like with “normal vision”. I am seeing mild starburst currently, but they don't bother me. For reference, I found some images on a photography site showing different degrees of starburst effect using a camera; search “SLR diffraction aperture starburst effects” – and you will see sample pictures of the starburst effect using a camera at eight different apertures. What I’m seeing looking at bright lights at night is pretty mild, I’d say looking at most lights, it’s somewhere between the f/5.6 and f/4 sample pictures from that photography site, and looking at very bright lights, the starburst effect is probably closest to the f/6.3 or f/9 samples. But again, they do not really causing any problems with night vision.

    So night driving artifacts are not too significant after a couple of weeks, and may diminish with neuro adaptation.

    Contrast Sensitivity and Low Light Vision

    Low light vision is much better than before with cataracts. I can read street names driving at night. There is a powder room in our house with very dark walls and black fixtures and low lighting that I always found hard to see in before; it seems much better brighter now with the PanOptix lens.When I update next, I will hope to have more comparisons -- particularly after I return to doing yoga in dark studios, but I'm expecting to notice a significant improvement from before.

  • Posted

    realized I can insert an image, but not a link. The link wasn't a jpg file, but managed to find a version in jpg that I can insert. Good reference from a photography site showing different degrees of starburst effect using a camera.What I'm seeing is probably around the f/5.6 or f/4, but with extremely bright lights, f/6.3 or perhaps as high as f/9.

    image

    • Posted

      Oh my gosh!!... my biggest fear is loosing my night vision, the halo ring that is mentioned by so many that has deterred me away from the Panoptix, pushing me towards the old monofocal lens. The Panoptix appears to be very impressive with the distant, intermediate, near clarity. But if your description of what you are seeing is the halo, starburst, holy cow what I'm seeing now is not even being depicted in these images. 10-15 years ago i was seeing f9-f6.3 and that didn't bother my night vision. Now I'm even more impressed with the Panotpix.

  • Posted

    Posted this in Autumn's discussions, but thought I'd add post here as well.

    Good news for US cataract patients who have had move limited premium IOL choices, the latest tri-focal should be available in the US soon to finally replace the older generation bi-focals.

    Alcon disclosed in it's May investor earnings call that it expects to get FDA approval for the PanOptix tri-focal in the US by late 2019 or early 2020.

    Search: Newly independent Alcon leans on surgical unit while awaiting key product launches

    • Posted

      For those interested, full transcript of the Alcon earnings call with lots of discussion on the PanOptix can be found by searching:

      Alcon, Inc. (ALC) Q1 2019 Earnings Call Transcript

    • Posted

      Also interesting. In the investor call one analyst asks about competitive pressures in Europe where J&J just launched an "intermediate focussed" IOL at a "lower price point".

      Found J&J release for earlier this year: Johnson & Johnson Vision Announces Availability in Europe of TECNIS Eyhance IOL

      J&J describes this as a mono-focal, not a EDOF.. But it says it offer distance and intermediate.Wonder what this is and how it's different than Symfony which is clearly an EDOF.

      Alcon says lower price really isn't an issue as patients looking for premium IOL are not that sensitive to price differences if they can get better vision. But it is watching with interest and working on some new products as well.

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.