Cologuard vs colonoscopy
Posted , 5 users are following.
Just wondering if anyoune has used cologuard (which is advertised alot here in the US) as an alternative to a colonoscopy and if so what is your opinion on it.
1 like, 5 replies
Posted , 5 users are following.
Just wondering if anyoune has used cologuard (which is advertised alot here in the US) as an alternative to a colonoscopy and if so what is your opinion on it.
1 like, 5 replies
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
dimmy M1954
Posted
raffie M1954
Posted
It's still new so my insurance doesn't cover it yet. Plan to use it if and when insurance covers the cost.
Raffie
etheremail M1954
Posted
It certainly sounds a better screening device than the existing stool test (which has been around for ages) but it is a screening test. It doesn't tell you what is going on where in the gut, it cannot treat polyps (which the colonoscopy can) and also blood in the stool can come from minor things such as piles. I think it is a very good advancement as a first line test but it is not a substitute for a colonoscopy (even the colonoscopy itself does not pick up everything always). However, if you are under 55-60 and have no family history, symptoms or risk factors I think it sounds far far better than doing nothing.
jeannette37038 M1954
Posted
raffie jeannette37038
Posted
You are correct in that it picks up the DNA and then you wind up doing to colonoscopy anyway which is why insurance companies are reluctant to cover cologuard. They're paying twice.
Regards,
Raffie