Do I need a biopsy?
Posted , 12 users are following.
Today I visited an urologist recommended by my primary doctor because he found a hard spot on my enlarged prostate . The urologist did an examination and confirmed there is a hard spot and that my prostate is enlarged. My PSA score is .40, a score that hasn't changed in 15 years (I'm 72 years old). The urologist feels that it would be best to do a biopsy to make sure there is no cancer. He did not mention any other tests like an MRI that several on another thread recommend. I just wonder, given my constant PSA score, if I really need a biopsy. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
0 likes, 49 replies
Tybeeman david53732
Posted
david41094 Tybeeman
Posted
1) MRI
2) Targetted biopsy
3) Blind biopsy
Whiteplume david53732
Posted
I would say get the biopsy done and make sure you have no cancer, the irony is that if you miss it, the situation could get much worse and require much more treatment.
Don't worry about the biopsy follow the instructions from your Doc. And don't listen to to much doom & gloom about this test, it's a little uncomfortable but let's be CLEAR,
(See how all the political class are now using this word!) think they will all follow each other like Blind Mice, May fox Davis & the clown. I digress! So let's be sensible get it done and for me get it OUT HOPEFULLY
CONTAINED should of course you have a cancerous prostate. Wish you well and lots of luck! I am 2 years on from prostectomy and have a normal life still riding the bike 60km on a good day! Incontinance soon recovers to maybe a small drop under stress from fitness, otherwise it's All Good don't wait to long it's a ticking bomb! The sooner it's defused the safer you will be.
You think you have problems, I had all mine done in a German Hospital Urologist was and is Brilliant! And follow up second to none. Four door spring technology! Works.
So my final word to all why be so silly and leave the EU. It's like this forum Better together (the Russians are at the Door)
Don't listen to May she a wolf in sheeps clothing!!!
Good luck sorry for the diversion to politics
You will be fine listen to the doctor and not all the crap that sometimes appears here.
This page should be better used to discuss the unfolding doom in the Conservative party remember you heard it hear first, it will not work!
Bye! Good Luck
Tommy ex Army 38 years!!!!
Get it done
david53732 Whiteplume
Posted
Roger2Dodger david53732
Posted
geoff90305 Roger2Dodger
Posted
Geoff
Roger2Dodger geoff90305
Posted
geoff90305,
My Urologist sent my biopsy remains to Prolaris a prognostic test developed by Myriad Genetic Laboratories. My test results came back showing my PCa was within the less aggressive range.16% positive cores (2/12. It also gave a Mortality Risk: 3% 10-year prostate cancer-specfic. Which I understood being a 3% chance of dying in 10 years.
My score meant my PCa was less aggressive than the average AUA' Intermediate risk.
I also had a MRI done which showed no PCa out side of the vessel. My Pirad score was 4.
So, I decidied to go on Active surveillance. I will make futher decisions on my treatment after I am re evualated in December.
geoff90305 Roger2Dodger
Posted
I have a friend with PCa T2. Been like this now for 14 years. He gets a MRI every year(he is now 80). The PCa does not seem to change or grow etc, so, proves that doing nothing works for some guys.
david53732 Roger2Dodger
Posted
terryw david53732
Posted
Hi David
I put up a thread here about 18 months ago on whether I should have a prostate biopsy and there is a lot of excellent feedback on that thread from people with all sorts of experiences.
I'm in the UK and the same age as you, and had a psa steady between 6 and 7 for 18 months or more. I knew nothing about pc before a keen GP put me in for a battery of test and flagged up the psa as risen. She found that my prostate was enlarged (BPH?) which would explain why my psa was slightly up, and I found that other GPs in the practice would not have referred me, but this doctor was keen to and I had two hospital appointments. By then I had done a lot of reading, and found that I was only told a good deal because they realised I already knew about it.
In the end I decided not to have a biopsy and cancelled a further hospital appointment. My decision was based on all my personal circumstances, plus the fact that even after 6 years my psa was nowhere near doubling, which suggests that if I have a tumour, which 70% of guys in their 70s are supposed to have, it is likely to be slow growing and unlikely ever to cause me any problems.
I know there are people who would not want to make that decision and would rather just follow what the medical profession tell them, but I'm satisfied that I have made the right decision for me and I'm happy with it.
I hope you can arrive at the right decision for you. All the best.
geoff90305 terryw
Posted
Hi Terry, Yes, we all have to make our decisions for our circumstances. Is it possible for you to get a MRI done. It is not invasive at all, but will give you a clearer picture what if anything is growing and a better opportunity to remedy it.
I agree, as we get into out 70's PCa is one of those things, and as long as it is the slow variety, then will not be a problem..for most of us.
I saw a paper from the UK last month talking about a guy in his 80's with PCa, that had spread, and he had the prostate removed and commenced other treatments. This basis was to remove the source of the PCa, and fight the escaped bits to give him a longer life.
Geoff
david53732 terryw
Posted
david53732 terryw
Posted
miss_sue david53732
Posted
You know already that the hard spot on your prostate is not normal . A biopsy would be able to a sign Gleason score to what is in the prostate . It will help you make decisions of what you should have done. You don't want to miss being able to put a halt to problem you could end up with. Can you ask to have the Mri done ?
miss_sue
Posted
geoff90305 miss_sue
Posted
david53732 miss_sue
Posted