Do you think my ankle is nonaligned?

I don't think so. I agree that there is a reason one is there (evolution) and it does serve a purpose (small amount of weight bearing and some stability) , but like I said it isn't a necessity like it is for some animals. I know personally since I don't have a connecting fibula and haven't had one for 20 years in my left leg. My stability is just fine and didn't prevent me from any activity I wanted to undertake (dance, running etc). It was my ankle arthritis that eventually put paid to my aspirations as a dancer not a lack of fibula.

Do you see a great potential for arthritis in my case?

Any damage to cartilaginous tissue leads to arthritis. In your case it's so small a break that you likely won't get it before your too old to care. Weighing up time pros and cons based purely on your x rays I would say surgery is v likely overkill. However knowing how debilitating arthritis is, I would definitely get another opinion from a trained pro and not put too much stock in well intentioned people off the net. I know quite a lot about this but you can't beat multiple opinions of trained professionals. Get another just to be sure and if they're all in agreement then go with that.

Good luck.

Thanks again for your response.

It seems that you think surgery is not needed but if I remember correctly you previously said that unless my ankle is fixed then I will have arthritis problems. Can you elaborate?

But I will seek another orthopedist opinion. I already booked a meeting for next Monday.

I think you need to get another opinion.

I am not a trained doctor. I have my experience but my experience is not yours. If more than 3 doctors tell me the same thing then I'm inclined to go with their advice. I know you're concerned, I would be too. But coming here to get accurate advice is always going to be dicey. My experience is not yours. However physics is physics. If you've already damaged a cartiliginous joint then it doesn't improve over time. I sense your worried and that's normal but after a third professional opinion I'd be inclined to go with that..

Yes I think you are right.

Btw, I asked from my ortho that how likely will I have an arthritis. He said that the likelihood is there, but it is not very big.

Thanks for your response. Of course I don't want a surgery. I was relieved when the doc told me that surgery is not likely needed. 

BUT, if the end result is better with the surgery then I would go for it. Surgery is  sometimes better of two evils. I just want to know if I would end up worse if my ankle is not operated.

And by they way, do you think your ankle would be better today without the surgery?

You know, doctors do make mistakes and having another opinion will be a bad thing.

I didn’t have a choice. Although your x Ray shows what may be some slight displacement... mine had multiple fractures which would have technically healed without surgery but because I displaced the one side badly that there was tendon damage so a big screw has been placed across and is being removed in two weeks which I’ve been not weight bearing for already two and half months and pray I haven’t broken the big screw as have had to put weight on it more than a few times including finding myself sleep walking to go to the bathroom as I’m single... again and cannot reiterate enough... if more than one ortho said u don’t need then pleas use rice method  rest elevation (toes above nose) and ice and soon you’ll be a lot happier than going under the knife because of arthritis which is unavoidable in most aging adults anyway... good luck and not preaching just don’t want someone going through what had been referred to as “routine” and although may be performed daily is not so routine on the patient which is why you’re on this Forum 

Hang in there, bro. It must be tough to go through this being single. Hopefully you have some relatives and friends to help you through this period.