Drain blood via a syringe during venesection
Posted , 8 users are following.
I must confess I don't like this at all - When I first started the venesection they just allowed the blood to flow freely via the tube. Now they effectively drain it via the syringe so that the syringe acts like a pump with them drawing back & fourth on it with their hand - Not very nice as a few times the bloods gone absolutely every where - They say its because its not free flowing I personally believe this as more to do with the time your effectively sitting in the chair and they have other patients waiting in the clinic so to speed it up they use this method
1 like, 24 replies
dillinger PaulRL70
Posted
I saw my consultant yesterday. My level was 1421 when I started venesection about 2 months ago. It's currently 698.
Hopefully if it keeps dropping at this rate I'll be below 50 by Christmas.
It is a pain in the arse going every week , it's a pain trying to organise it around work.
The nurses where I go are good as gold. Also when you sit there looking at all the poor sods that are there to have chemo you realise that there are a lot worse things to have than Haemochromatosis
PaulRL70 dillinger
Posted
Paul.
sheryl37154 PaulRL70
Posted
Sometimes it goes easy, others like above. I am also fighting fatigue and body pain even though I have been 'deironed' for years. I began thinking no wonder I feel like I am dragging around a heavy chain and anchor, plus the body pain if my blood is so thick and black like that.
When I complained to haemotologist, it must have been the nurses fault. Of course it isn't, although some a better than others. No answers to my problems - I just should not be having them because I am 'deironed'. So off my own bat, I decided to try thinning my blood down with aspirin.
100mg daily with breakfast. Within less than a week, I started to feel like I WANT to do things, walked faster, lighter. Because I now go to the gym 2-3 times per week to try to regain some strength and muscle lost over the years therefore pushing myself even further I still do crash and burn and while I get to a point after dinner that I can't remain upright anymore, I can take stuff to bed with me to continue to do while propped up.
My next venesection is due mid June. Can't wait to see what happens. I am not advocating it. But so far it is working for me. So it is under personal trial. I missed two days of taking the aspirin and really noticed the difference, then realised I had missed two days - aspirin has days marked on the press out bit.
I had thought of asking nurses to set up a saline solution feed at same time, but that could mean that they were collecting more saline than blood. So I will see how I go.
The weird thing is that all the time in the past, whenever a dr has tested my circulation on my ankle and groin points, they say it is very good. My oxygen level pre venesection is never less than 99% so one would think everything was perfect. it goes up to 100% after venesection, which could be a telling point. My BP is always low to good too.
sheryl37154
Posted
terrihigashi PaulRL70
Posted
I think your blood is just a little thick for niw. Weird barbaric way to get it out.
PaulRL70 terrihigashi
Posted
Paul
sheryl37154 PaulRL70
Posted
They used the syringes on me too in those four attempts, sometimes pushing saline into me at same time as well to unblock the clots which was really a waste of effort because then it is mostly saline that comes out.
That is why I decided I would try a daily dose of aspirin. My ferritin level was only 56 so it has nothing to do with ferritin level. Got no sensible answer from haemotologist why it is happening. Except I know that my serum iron (mobile iron in my veins) is still very high and my TS% is 100%, which means that 100% of the serum iron is available to store in my organs, if it was left to do so without venesections.
PaulRL70 sheryl37154
Posted