eGFR Calculator differences
Posted , 5 users are following.
Hi. For those that do not know me I am 68, single kidney (other removed due to cancer last July 31st). Since removal my eGFR started at 35, went as high as 43, but last was 38 (after fasting 12 hours). There is a eGFR calculator I found on the web from the national kidney foundation. I found a very interesting difference. Perhaps this is well known but it was news to me. I used a creatinine level of 1.8 (it is not unusual for this to be he "normal" creatinine level for a person with a solitary kidney). If I entered the 1.8, my age and calculated, the eGFR came out to be 38. This is consistent with what my last blood test found. HOWEVER. There is an option to enter your own height and weight rather than just letting the calculator use the average for a man my age (which is how it is done by the labs, using an average, not my actual). This time my eGFR came out to 44. Now both figures put me in the stage 3b category. But it is a good example of how just using "normal" or "averages" to compare ourselves to can sometimes be misleading.
2 likes, 6 replies
marj01201 rick39522
Posted
Rick,
Your point is well made. There are also minor differences across different eGFR calculator available online. For instance, I get higher eGFR numbers from calculators associated with Davila then that associated with the National Kidney Foundation. It's just another reason I try not to obsess too much over my actual data--the goal is basic stability or some overall improvement. That being said, I have another round of labs in another two weeks. I do notice my stress level elevating as the date for these labs comes closer🐶 So it is clearly easier said than done for me on managing my stress level related to all of this.
Marj
rick39522
Posted
marj01201 rick39522
Posted
Thanks, Rick! And I'll certainly let everyone know.
Marj
tony78174 rick39522
Posted
in terms of misleading......, it's more important to remember the lttle 'e' in 'eGFR' means estimation, not exact.
that's why they are developing a new test, the current one is so inaccurate.
rick39522 tony78174
Posted
Colombos rick39522
Posted