Enlarged Prostate Gland - Reports to request in 2nd opinion before surgery
Posted , 9 users are following.
Hello,
What are the reports that a Urologist should request to check for enlarged prostate gland issues? This is for a 66 year old male patient (my father) and his Ultrasound shows that his Prostate is severely enlarged with a volume of 74cc.
The opinion of the lab based on the ultrasound was:
"Severe prostatomegaly is noted with significant post void residue"
The PSA came at 3.95
The current Urologist has suggested surgery but I would like to get a 2nd opinion and also generate more tests and reports before taking the drastic steps.
Any other things I should consider at this stage? Is cancer also something we should potentially check for and if so, how is that detected?
Thanks in advance
1 like, 51 replies
bob120 johnm1976
Posted
My flow is decent now, but the tamsulosin turns it into a stronger flow for two days. I do this on my own, thinking if I am forming stones, this may wash them out rather than allow them to take root and grow. The tamsulosin does have side effects but just taking it two nights a week is quite tolerable for me.
derek76 bob120
Posted
The nurse at the GP practice I go to sees a lot of Guys with problems.
bob120 derek76
Posted
I had been using cipro for about 3 years for UTI's, and never had a problem. This happened out of the blue.
I agree there can be nasty side effects to tamsulosin, but when you can't pee and this gives you relief, it's hard not risk the side effects, and hope you don't get the worst of it. When I was blocked up, my only other choice was self cathing, but that can have nasty side effects too. Most people don't get the worst side effects, but if you do, the statistics don't help you. After three years and much research I have found no evidence of any risk free bph drug or treatment that I thought could work for me. If I had, I would have tried it.
derek76 bob120
Posted
Why are you against the the Laser procedures for BPH.
bob120 derek76
Posted
bob120 derek76
Posted
The GL resulted in a 9 week recovery and about 6 months before I had another problem. My uro found a 1.5cm membrane had grown over my bladder mouth and was blocking the urethra. He used a cutting wire on the cystoscope to remove it. No wanting more surgery he gave me the option of self cathing every two weeks to keep the channel open which I did for a year. Last December I had uncontrolled bleeding (thick red tomato sauce with purple clots, not the burgundy colored urine I had seen during my two previous recoveries). I spent a week in hospital, had emergency surgery to cauterize three bleeders, had my bladder cleaned of clots, had bladder stones blasted and removed, and had a resection of the bladder neck to smooth it out and widen it. Also needed 8 pints of whole blood. In the past 7 months I am doing OK with a decent (not spectacular stream) going every 2 - 3 hours around the clock. I have not had any retention which had been a nightly occurence before the GL, and every 2-3 hours is way better than every 45 minutes which was the norm before the GL. So the GL was an improvement, but many would probably consider I din't get the advertised result that the brochures spoke of. It may have worked that way for others, but for me, it gave me a bearable result. I just dodn't know how long it will last.
RonTexan bob120
Posted
Maybe if we promote it here we can find someone who has tried this solution in humans.
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia -
An intriguing study published in 2014 showed a dramatic reduction in prostate volume in dogs treated with PEMF. The study authors treated 20 dogs with BPH with five minutes of PEMF administered percutaneously twice daily for three weeks and recorded a 57% average reduction in prostate volume with no detectable side effects. [21] Whether or not this therapy is effective for human males suffering from BPH remains to be seen.
derek76 bob120
Posted
What was the time scale of your nine week recovery?
Membrane or other growth seems to quite a common post operation problem.
bob120 derek76
Posted
Not sure I know what you mean by time scale of my 9 week recovery. I'd say by 9 weeks, the bleeding, urgency, bladder spasms, etc. were pretty much gone.
Bob
derek76 bob120
Posted
With my green light laser the recovery was more or less immediate. Operation Friday afternoon in Newcastle. Kept until Sunday morning as I had some retention and they were concerned that as I was travelling home to Edinburgh by train I would be away from their care.
Pink stinging urination with some clots but no urgency for the first few days. On the Monday I went to the races. Previously I used to rush to a toilet as soon as I got off the bus but not that day until I got to the course. The afternoon went by and by leaving time I thought that I had better go to the toilet although no real need and I had three large coffees during the afternoon. There was a bus strike on the Wednesday and I walked two miles to a dermatology appointment and home again. By the end of week three my urine was clear but my flow not as good as hoped for.
Last years Thulium Laser procedure was a bit more drawn out as I was still passing blood the following morning and they sent me home with a catheter in. I had blood and debris in the catheter for the first two weeks but no pain I just went out and about as usual. The blood lightened during the next two weeks and was clear when the catheter was removed. The only problem was the catheter aquired infection. No urgency, no retention but a slowish flow that took a month or so to improve but not what I'd hoped for.
Probably no connection but over the last three weeks I have been passing a lot less urine than usual although my intake stays the same.
American friends who had TUMP were not impressed and either had repeats or asked for PVP.
bob120 RonTexan
Posted
One company in Greece lent their pemf device to Ioannina University in Greece in 2011. They did a double bind study of 20 men wth bph and used the device known as the Papimi device on 10 of the men for 30 minutes a day for two weeks. They reported sigificant lasting improvements on the men treated with the device. So, unless the study was fraudulent, then the device has been used to improve bph on humans. On the downside, the device costs $18,000 and is banned by the FDA in the US. Supporters of the device say the FDA denial had no basis in fact, and was a hatchet job which stopped the FDA trials in the third phase without cause. What's puzzling is that Greek people with bph aren't lining up at the factory, that supposedly allows patients to use spare machines for free at the recommendation of their physicians.
Bob
bob120 derek76
Posted
I believe you are right about the time it takes to get there. Someone with bph for 20+ years and a prostate that had grown over 120 g. was probably going to have a difficult recovery. How large was your prostate?
If I understand your story you had the Thulium laser last year and followed up with a PVP GL laser this year? Does that mean the Thulium laser didn't give the results desired?
My bladder resection had a much quicker recuperation than my GL. I wonder if this is really a two step operation for some? A gross removal of prostate tissue first, followed some months later by a fine tuning.
I've read of quite a few people needing a second turp procedure to clean up or supplement their first one.
Bob
derek76 bob120
Posted
It had regrown to 130grms by 2012 and I had the Thulium Laser in May 2013. After it I asked how big it as then. He replied BIG but I did not measure it. A top Uro I spoke to a few years ago said that initially they thought GL was a quick simple procedure but they now realise that it has to be done with more care.
Quite a few needed follow ups or second procedures. One person I know was told on later examination that it looked like ragged curtains hanging down inside.
My first surgeon said that they originally used a bladder neck sparing method. They moved on to the later GL laser but although some wanted to continue with it they elected for HoLEP.
My surgeon last year said that GL is no good and is just a commercial procedure that was why I was back for another procedure.
Urologist are split into several obsinate camps.
RonTexan bob120
Posted
derek76 RonTexan
Posted
When taking viagra I did not notice the added benefit but with Cialis my flow was much better during that window of oppertunity.
mike48088 bob120
Posted
It is hardly surprising, if a physician's approval is required. Doctors are never keen to try something new, and, without their co-operation, the Greeks have probably not heard about it anyway. When I have found out what PEMF is, I will investigate it in UK, but I don't think it will help me.
Mike
mike48088 RonTexan
Posted
I am no expert, but I understand that viagra-type products are designed to provide a lasting erection. Since it is generally accepted that it is not possible to urinate with a full erection, this may be the reason that it works. I hope that it did, ideed, work.
Mike
derek76 mike48088
Posted
With viagra it still takes stimulation to get an erection
RonTexan mike48088
Posted
bob120 RonTexan
Posted
Good luck tomorrow and keep us posted.
Bob