First ever mammogram tomorrow terrified of it
Posted , 8 users are following.
What should I ask, I am told it can be excruciatingly painful and that the pain can go on for days - I have a low threashold to pain. From what I have read it sounds horrendous, squashing the breasts in a machine sonds like mediaeval torture. HELP all I want to do is not turn up EVER
1 like, 35 replies
karen007 Tazchurch
Posted
Tazchurch karen007
Posted
karen007 Tazchurch
Posted
Tazchurch karen007
Posted
Will see what she says though.
Tazchurch karen007
Posted
Will see what she says though.
sue34151 Tazchurch
Posted
take care
suex
Tazchurch sue34151
Posted
susan10291 Tazchurch
Posted
Tazchurch susan10291
Posted
janet74211 Tazchurch
Posted
Regarding epilepsy both my children suffered badly so understand how you feel. If you explained your situation to the staff they
Will be able to great care of you.
At the end of the day we are all our own controllers with what we decide, so we can only blame ourselves if things go wrong. But
If they go right then great. As said before mammograms saved my life and have yearly checks I am so grateful for life.
Wish you well with whatever you decide to do.
janet74211 susan10291
Posted
Tazchurch janet74211
Posted
Sorry if I have frustrated or upset anone and I hope that all metioned do well
Informed janet74211
Posted
During the 1970's and before, treatment for breast cancer was very drastic and horrific, and there was a clear need to find out very early on if any intervention could be done much sooner to save women from going through such terrible surgery. Hence the introduction of the screening programmes and the praise of mammography. Nowadays the treatment for breast cancer has improved dramatically, such that very early intervention might not be the best thing after all, as many early abnormalities picked up by mammography turn out not to do any harm to the woman during her lifetime. This is the information which is slowly finding its way into our screening leaflets. Why do you think so many female doctors are not having mammograms? What do they know that you don't?
Now that we are 30 years or more down the road from screening, medical literature has pointed to screening finding many of the small, unpalpable, slow growing sorts of cancers, which would not go on to cause harm. The problem with screening is that it puts the woman in a dilemma - if she didn't attend screening, she would be blissfully unaware that she is carrying one of these tumours, but if she goes to screening, she finds herself a cancer patient for much of her life with all the treatment that that entails. The choice, which to do, must rest entirely with the woman. The treatment now has improved so much from 30 years ago, that it is also a responsible decision to only take action when a symptom is found. You will probably end up with the same treatment that the woman gets who has attended regular screening anyway. Highly aggressive, life-threatening tumours are felt very early on, and providing the woman presents early with her symptoms these should be addressed as soon as possible. It is wrong to claim that mammograms are always a life saver, since they more likely find slow growing tumours, which, even if you did nothing at all, would take years, if ever, to kill you.
janet74211 Informed
Posted
susan10291 Tazchurch
Posted
i am obviously feeling far too emotional and  fragile to take part in discussions so I will take myself off the forum.
Tazchurch Informed
Posted
Emis_Moderator Tazchurch
Posted
AlanÂ
janet74211 Emis_Moderator
Posted