Frozen shoulder - choices of treatment
Posted , 53 users are following.
I first noticed the symptoms of FS about 4 months ago - it seemed to come out of the blue for no reason at all. Just as mystifying was what should I do about it - do I go to a physio, GP, acupuncturist, osteopath, chiropractor - or am I better off doing nothing at all?!!
After doing some research, I decided my best course of action would be to go to an osteopath. However, what I would advise other sufferers is to be aware that this can be a very, very long process and can end up costing you a fortune!!
They gave me twice-weekly appointments at the beginning which I didn't mind paying for as I wanted to get myself cured as soon as possible.
The appointments involved gentle manipulation and she would give me exercises to do at home. My arm is gradually getting some small amount of movement back (although my practititioner did say that this was largely due to my hard work at sticking to the exercises) and the pain has diminished (although from what I understand this is part of the disease process and is probably nothing to do with the osteopath!)
In retrospect, I am glad that I sought treatment with an osteopath, but in my naivety I had not realised what a long process it would be and how much it would cost. I am still going to sessions but, at my request, I have staggered the appointments so that they are further apart.
I am now getting pains in the other side and unless I win the lottery, I feel that I couldn't possibly afford to go through it all again!!
2 likes, 221 replies
judyb
Posted
It's really interesting to hear a range of experiences because those of us who have had more than one FS seem to have had more pain on one side than the other. If it's true that the dominant side is more painful - certainly the case in my own experience - then perhaps the extra aggravation of HAVING to move it so much more is the cause. This would back the theory that doing nothing, and certainly not physio, may help to speed up the recovery time. Easier said than done though and I hope I never have to test out this theory in the future! Good luck to you all and I hope that any new sufferers exploring this website may benefit from our stories, I know it has helped me to know I'm not alone; sympathising with each other has been a good source of support.
HeatherL
Posted
Gerry_the_neck
Posted
Firstly, in response to Heatherl, I don't think there's anything to worry about in terms of the FS symptoms becoming permanent. Most ex sufferers will agree that it returns to normal eventually, perhaps with a different time span for each individual. This all points to the fact that there is usually nothing intrinsically wrong with the shoulder. I'm a decorator, and whenever I had it (3 times, each lasting 10 - 12 months) I found that When I was standing I could still work as long as I didn't raise the offending arm above shoulder height, or try to reach around behind me. Both of these movements seemed to be the main aggravators. I also had trouble washing, shaving etc but only in the first few months. However, when I sat down, or lay down, the pain just intensified. So I had to find sleeping positions where this effect wasn't so bad, and I think once I'd experimented a bit and got the hang of it, it started to improve. My sofa proved invaluable. I now believe that its the position of the neck when we sleep which determines the severity of the symptoms. It may well be slightly different for everyone, depending on their different vulnerabilities and tolerances, but I suspect the source and the key to treatment is the same. I think I could go to 5 different professionals for advice and find that they advise 5 different treatments !
It was nice to read that other posters had similar experiences, and I'd hope that that should help with reassuring those who are new to it.
Gerry
Steadyang
Posted
I just like to find out when some one say he/her shoulder get frozen up, is it mean it is the pain that prevent he/she to move further? Or the shoulder just frozen up without pain but cannot move to the range once it can, such as we cannot rotate our head all the way to the back, but when we try, it just stop to the limit but without any pain.
In my case of frozen shoulder, it is the pain that prevent me from going further, such as only able to elevate from hand rest at the side position up to about 120 deg to the front with arm straighten, normaly we should able to go up to as far as 180deg. It is the pain that prevent me from execute the movement, it was not just frozen. So I do not know what is the common saying that there is a Pain-Frozen-Thawing stages. I felt the Pain & Frozen are togehter all the time.
Gerry_the_neck
Posted
The term Frozen is used in the metaphorical sense that normal movement is restricted within certain limits, otherwise it causes pain. The limit differs for everyone, at different stages, but a good common denominator would be raising the arm to just about shoulder height before the pain kicks in. Its still possible to raise above this height, its just too painfull. And, of course, the pain can also intensify in certain sitting and lying down positions with no raising of arm whatsoever ( yet another reason for suspecting that its not the shoulder itself which is causing the pain). So, the shoulder isn't 'frozen' as such.....its simply restricted. There is no 'thawing out'.....but there is an easing of the restriction (hopefully) , usually over a set period of time until the problem resolves itself (again hopefully). It does seem that some people get more restriction...i.e only ably to raise arm a matter of inches, and with some people it takes longer to resolve, but these are usually the exeptions to the rule ( I know, not very helpful if its you ). With regard to movements and exercising, i think its obvious what the shoulder is trying to tell us.......don't extend your arm beyond the points where pain kicks in. If a need is felt to have to exercise it, always stay within the pain-free limits allowed, and it will most likely heal sooner. Why the Physios always seem to insist on testing yourself against the pain is just beyond my comprehension. You wouldn't normally see a need to have to exercise your shoulder, so why should it become necessary when your shoulder is even more vulnerable. Crazy !
Daphnemargaret
Posted
Gerry_the_neck
Posted
Gerry
Lesley998
Posted
HeatherL
Posted
Lesley998
Posted
i'm sorry - i don't want to appear confrontational - but where on earth did you get that information, as it is totally not what i have learned about frozen shoulder. i was told it has absolutely nothing to do with trapped nerves and is everything to do with tendonitis and damage to the rotator cuff. i'm="" sorry="" -="" i="" don't="" want="" to="" appear="" confrontational="" -="" but="" where="" on="" earth="" did="" you="" get="" that="" information,="" as="" it="" is="" totally="" not="" what="" i="" have="" learned="" about="" frozen="" shoulder.="" i="" was="" told="" it="" has="" absolutely="" nothing="" to="" do="" with="" trapped="" nerves="" and="" is="" everything="" to="" do="" with="" tendonitis="" and="" damage="" to="" the="" rotator="" cuff.="">
i'm sorry - i don't want to appear confrontational - but where on earth did you get that information, as it is totally not what i have learned about frozen shoulder. i was told it has absolutely nothing to do with trapped nerves and is everything to do with tendonitis and damage to the rotator cuff. >
Gerry_the_neck
Posted
That's ok. It's an important question to ask. Many professionals will refer to Frozen Shoulder as either Adhesive Capulitis or Rotator Cuff Damage, and they will use that as a reason to justify interventions. I don't know for sure how valid their description is. But I do know that in the circumstances where a condition (FS) resolves itself in time, leaving no apparent evidence of long lasting damage, that its only right to ask the question whether there was any damage in the first place. Their description suggests there was damage to begin with, but where does that 'damage' go ? If it just healed by itself it would still leave evidence and vulnerabilities for the future. This doesn't seem to happen. It is possible that if Rotator Cuff damage was there prior to the FS setting in, but unnoticeable, then it might become highlighted with the onset of FS. I don't know.
However, FS is usually initiated with some physical movement, in my case simply reaching behind to get something from back seat in car. It doesn't result from an actual accident, where some damage to the shoulder would obviously set something off. So, what is the cause of the rotator cuff damage ? Simple movements don't create this sort of damage. Also a lot of people tend to get FS in both shoulders at different times. What are the chances that they would have the same rotator cuff damage in both shoulders....minimal ! And if the FS is a result of damage, why doesn't it get worse if that damage isn't corrected ?
For me, there are too many reasons pointing to no actual problem with shoulder itself. There may well be such a thing as rotator cuff damage, but I doubt that it has anything to do with the most likely cause of FS. I've had cervical spondylosis (neck nerve problems) for many years and I've come to see FS as a typical recurring side symptom of that C/S condition. I've had FS 3 times. I've never had any interventions (injections or surgery), it hasn't recurred for over 10 years, and today my shoulder feels perfectly normal.
My sympathies to anyone who is experiencing FS at the moment, but I will say be wary of over exercising and interventions which might leave damage. If I was going to be cynical I might say that those who advise serious interventions might be inclined to describe the condition in a way which justifies their opinion.
Gerry
Summeralex
Posted
Gerry_the_neck
Posted
G
Gerry_the_neck
Posted
Lesley998
Posted
thanks!