Gamma knife treatment for acoustic neuroma
Posted , 5 users are following.
l have a23mm rounded neuroma and l am awaiting gamma knife treatment My surgeon has informed me that the success rate is 80%asopposed to90% for a smaller sized tumour He also said that when a larger tumour is treated it can become guey and leak and a shunt may be needed This has reply scared me but he would recommend radiation as opposed to open scull surgery He says there would be less complications This guy will be doing my actual treatment in Leeds l would appreciate comments from anyone who has had gk treatment for a similar size of tumour
0 likes, 12 replies
alison28608 dolores89065
Posted
alison28608 dolores89065
Posted
dolores89065 alison28608
Posted
alison28608 dolores89065
Posted
dolores89065 alison28608
Posted
alison28608 dolores89065
Posted
dolores89065 alison28608
Posted
You seem to have had a rough journey but thankfully things are improving for you Time is a great healer l am going to go forward in a positive manner Worrying won't help matters and when negatives come our way we somehow get the strength to cope
alison28608 dolores89065
Posted
Olizzieo dolores89065
Posted
Hi Dolores, I haven't had surgery but am an audiologist who recently saw a client in the same situation. Don't be scared of any of it. If you are one of the 20% that it doesn't work for, there is then the option of open skull surgery. This used to be the only option and is also very safe. The radiation therapy can knock your balance around but you will recover quickly as the body learns to rebalance. A shunt is used in many surgeries when discharge of any kind needs to be released. It is nothing to be frightened of. It sounds like you have a very good ENT so trust in them. They are a very clever group of specialists. After you have recovered from your treatment, look at getting a Phonak CROS device as most people find them very helpful to hear from the ear side that has the neuroma, when the sound is directed to a hearing aid in your good ear. It means not having to always rely on turning your head to hear. Good luck. It will be a rough couple of weeks but in 20 years I haven't seen any complications with removal of acoustic neuroma's. Take care xxxx
dolores89065 Olizzieo
Posted
Olizzieo dolores89065
Posted
I don't know about the shunt being left in or removed. Your ENT would be the best one to ask. When you have very poor speech discrimination - as you said you have for your left ear, the only thing you will possible get from a hearing aid is sound awareness - so you hear a vehicle coming towards you when you cross a road and possible ability to localise (tell where a sound is coming from.) Has your ENT given any possibility of the hearing being saved in the ear with an acoustic neuroma? If the hearing completely goes after treatment, then there is no point in having a hearing aid on that ear so make sure you are able to return the hearing aid and exchange it for a CROS, which will be of some benefit. If you have hearing, I think it is important to try a hearing aid on that ear but because of your poor speech understanding you may find little point in wearing a hearing aid and need to change to a CROS. Ask your audiologist which CROS they were going to fit. I wasn't aware that Oticon had a CROS aid. Make sure they sell several brands of aids as Oticon dealers are usually owned by Oticon and only sell Oticon. They are great hearing aids if you don't have single sided deafness. The Phonak CROS 11 has shown the best outcomes for single sided deafness, with the Widex CROS being a good cheaper version. CROS aids used to be hopeless but I have found the Phonak CROS 11 is the best so far, in noise. I have copied information which explains why they are better in noise than previous CROS aids.
"The new key feature of Phonak CROS II is StereoZoom. By focusing on a single voice in a crowd, it allows for improved speech understanding in noisy situations."
Please feel free to ask any other questions. Most people don't find wearing a hearing aid helpful but it is important to try it. It's like having a radio station up load and turned off the station. You will receive no clarity and very little useful information. Because the sound from your poor ear combines with your good ear, some people find this of benefit. They are less aware of how poor the poor ear is when combined with their good ear. These people are rare but do end up keeping a hearing aid for their poor ear. Never buy an expensive aid for that ear though as you won't get the benefit, even if it has great noise processing. You have virtually no clarity in that ear so whether the noise processing in the aid is great or basic, you will not get your money's worth from an expensive aid when you have poor speech understanding.
pam79739 Olizzieo
Posted
So undecided.