GreenLight Vs Urolift
Posted , 28 users are following.
Hi
I live in Toronto, Canada. I have been suffering with BPH for the past five years. I am 54 years old with no children and don't expect to have children. I am faced with two options. Take the greenlight surgery which is completely free and is paid by the government health insurance. The other option is to do the Urolift, but it will cost me $10000 which is not covered by insurance and has to come out of my own pocket. $10000 is a lot of money for me. I am not sure how long the urolift will last and if my prosate will keep on growing even with the urolift in place.I really don't know what to do. Hoping that you'll can give me some suggestions.
1 like, 129 replies
ianC daniel1960
Posted
Difficult choice. Sorry to read that. In the end, of course, only you can decide.
My view is that it would be worth shelling out for the UroLift. Three reasons to my knowledge:
1: there is less chance of erectile disfunction;
2: of lengthy (tho' not painful, if my experience is anything to go by) healing (leukocytes and blood in the urine) - mine is still happening after 3 months of HoLEP surgery (a supposed improved version of green light surgery); and
no external ejactulant (seems the latter part of the urethra is lost, resulting in the ejcaulate gong straight into the bladder) - perhaps not a biggy, but, for me, a bit disconcerting.
I couldn't have the UroLift, else I would have done it. The surgeons I talked to did say that as it is new, there is some uncertainty about how long it would last, but they thought it ought to be little worse than any prostateactomy. Plus there are somethings that are supposed to slow/halt prostate growth.
Best wishes, Ian
RonTexan ianC
Posted
Best wishes, Ron
ianC RonTexan
Posted
Mine was performed in Brentwood, a place to the East of London, UK.
Best wishes, Ian
kenneth1955 ianC
Posted
nktoronto RonTexan
Posted
If you do not mind, tell me why you are glad you did not get Urolift. This will help me compare TURP vs UL.
mark23925 ianC
Posted
kenneth1955 mark23925
Posted
Mark that is very good advise. Doctors do not feel we need it when we get older. They tell you very little or tell you all will be the same. But it's not. Have a good day Ken
derek76 mark23925
Posted
mark23925 ianC
Posted
derek76 mark23925
Posted
derek76 daniel1960
Posted
Urolift seems to be effective but I cannot see what is going to stop it from continuing to grow as nothing has been taken away and ten Grand is a lot of money.
While I was happy with PVP last years surgeon was very much against it saying that it is a commercial procedure and not a cure. Much of the cost for PVP is for the use once laser rod.
Albin daniel1960
Posted
I had it done about 3 weeks ago and my initial reaction was very positive but now with each following week it seems to be going back to my original symptoms that prompted me to get the Urolift. It's still a "little better" than before the treatment but I thought it would improve more with each week. That hasn't happened BUT it may be too early to judge the results. Here's another possible suggestion. I have a 77 year old frined who decided that his solution was to do a selt-catherization.
Each night he inserts the catheter [along with a bag for the urine} and he sleeps like a baby, then wakes up wiith a bag of urine. Does anyone else in this group know anyone who does self-catherization? If my Urolift doesn't give good results, I may end up with doing the self-catherization.
derek76 Albin
Posted
RonTexan Albin
Posted
After having done it once I know I could do it again, it's a learning process like anything else. I was extremely careful to be immaculate and careful, maybe unnecessarily so. I say go for it, I used the reddish-brown one with the turned-up tip to help get through the prostate. It also had a little button where you grasp it to indicate the position of the turned-up tip. It was very thin and I would definitely use that one again.
I expect to be through with prostate problems as my Holep was an amazing, off-the-chart success and my surgeon tells me that only one percent of his Holep surgeries ever require another procedure.
There cannot be a procedure less-painful or troublesome than my experience has been. I'm literally overwhelmed.
But try the self-cathing. Like me, you may come to a point where you need to know if you can do it. Knowing that you can avoid the emergency room is an enormous plus and you may find that you can do it indefinitely. There is one caution; one of the posters I read developed a minor pain and ignored it. it was an infection which got much worse causing him to lose a testicle. So, if it hurts get to the doc for antibiotics immediately.
Good luck and keep us posted.
Ron
evan70088 RonTexan
Posted
Hello Ron,
Did you get both Urolift and Holep? I'm researching the best route for my BPH and trying to get as much advice as I can about different procedures.
Thanks,
Evan
kenneth1955 evan70088
Posted
Good afternoon. Don't know how old you are and if retro ejaculation is a concern of your. They can do a Urolift up to 80 ml Some doctor will do it up to 100 and if you have a median lobe they can pin it to one side. This procedure they keep on saying that it is new. It was new when I had it done over 3 years ago. With trial 2 years before that. I was number 20 for my doctor I have no problem with the urolift My prostate is wide open. It can last 5 year or more. Just like any other procedure. We have had men on here that have had 2 turp or a turp and GL in a couple of years. I feel sorry for themm that they had to do it all over again. . Just because you have one does not mean that your done that is up to your prostate. You still may have a repeat with any procedure. For me If my prostate grows and I need a few more clips so be it. It is a easy procedure and you can see result in a few weeks. And there are no side effect like the others. Take care and do your research before you pick anything. Good Luck Ken
laura00828 RonTexan
Posted
Hi Ron,
I know this post is old so I hope you are still around. I am looking for help for my dad who is almost 87. Despite a stroke from anesthesia about 12 years ago that left him unable to speak and one arm paralyzed--he has felt good and has been enjoying life. A few years ago he began being incontinent and the Uro said he prob had retention and needed a cystoscopy. Well he had one done and left the foley in there till we decide to do the Green light (which he said was our ONLY choice) well my poor dad as I type is in the hospital with a horrible infection. So hard to see him in such pain. And we don't know what to do! The foley/cystoscopy and infection have really debilitated him. I don't know how he will withstand surgery. Was the Holep painful? How was the recovery and do you think it would be safe for a senior? I would love for him to be able to self cath till he builds up his strength but he only has one hand. Thanks for any advice.
kenneth1955 laura00828
Posted
Laura so sorry for your father. At 87 I would not put him through that surgery.. There has to be something else to do. Have you looked into Suprapubic Catheter. They would put it in through a small incision above the pubic area.....I think this surgery would be much easier for your father and for you guys to take care of. I am sorry but who know if the Green Light will work. The doctor does not know until it done and if to don't you put you father through something he did not need.to go through. This is only my opinion. There is another man on here Frank He is 89 and the doctor wanted to do surgery on him they only give him a 50/50 chance of any surgery working. Think about what you are doing. Good luck and god bless Ken
derek76 laura00828
Posted
The surgeon who did my GL procedure said that he had performed it on a man of 92 with a 120 grm prostate as he described it as a 'very gentle' procedure. However with your fathers previous reaction to anesthesia I would imagine that they would not want to risk that again leaving a spinal as the only alternative.
kenneth1955 derek76
Posted
Derek & Laura When picking a procedure we really don't know if it will work. It is the only procedure the doctor is suggesting. There has to be something else that would help him. But we have to look at his age. Look what happen when he went in healthier 10 years ago. My doctor has worked on patients over 90. I know the way my doctor feel I can not speak for your fathers doctor but my doctor looks at the health of the patient and he will only do the lease stressful procedure for that patient. I don't know if a spinal would be good for your father either after a stroke What ever procedure you pick you your mother and your father have to sit down and discuss it. I know you want to help your father but I think you need to get another doctor involved and the health of your father has to be considered. I know this is hard for you but we try to do the best for out loved one. God bless you. Ken .
derek76 kenneth1955
Posted
Yes, Kenneth, the gentle procedure and at his age he does not want a brutal TURP and just enough taken away to relieve his symptoms. We don't know which part of the prostate is causing the problem but at 87 I doubt if your dreaded Retro is a concern if it is a large median lobe.
kenneth1955 derek76
Posted
Yes Derek It is much better then a Turp and I am not worry about retro for him but I am worried about him going through that surgery especially if there were not the right test to see what is the problem. Do you know if he had a MRI to take pictures of his prostate. They need to sit down with the doctor or get another opinion. Also they need to talk with a anesthesiologist to see what can be done. This problem was cause by his last surgery if I remember right. He had no problem going to the bathroom before his last surgery. I just don't want him to go through something that is not going to fix his problem. He is not like a lot of the men on here 50 or 60 that if it does not work we can look to try another procedure. I know you had a couple of GL but you were in different health. Or there is my other friend in the UK. John R He wanted a Urolift first but when he went to the doctor it was to late for him He was just 75 last week and he had the GL yesterday in the UK. Don't remember the hospital but he said it was very nice. he feel great But he was in better health then Laura's father They need to go slow and get the right procedure that will help him. GL may be the one but I just don't want that doctor going in blind and just cutting away. It may cause him more problem. God bless you and Good luck to him Ken
derek76 kenneth1955
Posted
He has BPH and that was not what was caused by his last operation. If you read my posts I always try to call GL and Holep prcedures and not operations as there is no cutting or stitching involved. I wish that GL had been around in my father in laws time as he was in his 80's and in poor health so could not have a TURP. They fitted a stent that had to be removed and then he had an in dwelling catheter for the rest of his days.
The only advice that Laura can take is that of an expert who knows her fathers condition and needs and who will do what is in his best interests.
I assume as she uses the word 'Seniors' that she is in America and not the UK. We don't know if he is being seen in doctors or urologists office or at a hospital perhaps at his age it is a VA hospital.
I can assure her that GL is in no way painful after the procedure apart from some stinging at the start of urination.. There was some morphine in my drip after each of my laser procedures but after that I did not need anything.
kenneth1955 derek76
Posted
laura00828 derek76
Posted
Yes I am in the US NYC area. Did your father in law do ok with his indwelling catheter? I hate for my dad to have one but better that than lose him as anesthesia is the biggest concern. They had a urologist poke his head in the room. He was pretty useless. I asked him about GL versus Holep and he didn’t know what I was talking about. He suggested the TURP and ran out the door.
kenneth1955 laura00828
Posted
derek76 laura00828
Posted
On this Forum it is difficult to believe that Urologists like the one you met still exist but the fact is that TURP is still the most performed procedure for BPH even in America. I ran a mile when it was suggested to me in 1995 and waited for one of the laser procedures that was being developed. It was a long wait before GL appeared. It has been improved over the years and is now in its third version.
derek76 kenneth1955
Posted
kenneth1955 derek76
Posted
Derek I was only concerned with one of my surgery's . It was when I had my heart ablation about 2 years ago. I was out for 9 hours and it took me all most 3 to wake up. I was very tired and the only thing I could said when I woke up was why is my wrist wrapped up and I was told not to touch. I found out later that it had something to do with my blood pressure. It was a IV just in case something happen that could give medicine in a hurry. I told him that I did not care but I should have been told about it before the procedure. They told me about everything else. It's just I like to know what is going on. Ken
laura00828 derek76
Posted
Thanks Derek. My dad usually walks around the lake with mom everyday and goes up 15 steps at their home. Do you think for someone of that activity level the suprapubic catheter would be a hindrance? My alternative thought was that this could be an interim step. He could get rid of that awful foley and regain his stamina and then maybe have something else done in the future. I can’t tell how easy/challenging the supra is. Doctors make it sound like a breeze, but they make everything sound like a breeze. Yes that awful doctor literally was in the room 5 minutes and took off! That was our “consult” 🙄
kenneth1955 laura00828
Posted
Laura. I know I'm not Derek But I feel that would be much easier on your father and your mother would not have any trouble changing it. Think you have a plan Ken
derek76 laura00828
Posted
How long has he had the foley in ? People on here seemed to have coped with a supra pubic one quite well. I had one after my aortic valve was replaced as they could not get a conventional one past my prostate in the operating theatre. I can't really say much about it as my walking was rather limited for the few days I had it as I was also connected to an ECG monitor and a bag collecting fluid from a lung.
I had an ordinary one for a bit after my second laser prostate surgery and got around OK with it and travelled on public transport and went to the races.
laura00828 derek76
Posted
He's had the foley in for 3 weeks. His PCP ordered a pelvis scan and came by the hospital. He said we have to decide quick! He said my dad's prostate is the size of the little hospital apple sauce container which is apparently huge! I think we'll have to go for the suprapubic as I just don't think he's hearty enough for the laser procedures. Thanks all for your help and I'll let you know how it turns out.
kenneth1955 laura00828
Posted
Larua. If you and your Mother and Father think it's best they do it for now and then let him rest and heal. Good luck Ken
derek76 laura00828
Posted
I was told in 1995 when mine was 35 grms that I needed a TURP as a matter of some urgency. I ignored that and it was 75 grms before I had GL in 2004. It regrew to 135 grms by 2013 when I had another laser procedure. I'm sorry I can't relate that to the apple sauce container.
They obviously want to do a procedure because of its size. If they prescribe Finasteride/Avodart any reduction in size would take months.
kenneth1955 derek76
Posted
I don't understand the little jar of apple sauce size chart. Most urologist use fruit size. I know before I had my Urolift I was told that mine was the size of a large lemon.which with this chart is 50 g They use a transrectal ultrasound. Here is what the rest said......Normal Size ( Chest Nut ) 20 g...Enlarge Prostate ( Plum ) 25 g....Enlarge Prostate ( Lemon ) 50 g.....Enlarge Prostate ( Orange ) 75 g.....Enlarge Prostate ( Grape Fruit ) 100 g They also gave you what the occupies of the rectum lumen of each was. There was a total of 150 men in this study.
derek76 kenneth1955
Posted
My last one (135 grm) must have been a Melon though the one I have in the kitchen weighs much more than that.
kenneth1955 derek76
Posted
Yes they only went to the 100 g mark so it most likely a cantaloupe size.135 g. I am glad I found that chart. Some men on here when a doctor tell that the size or 75 g or so they don't understand. I know it's almost 9PM by you. I'm just going to eat some dinner. Have a good evening Ken
lee56659 kenneth1955
Posted
derek76 kenneth1955
Posted
I'm waiting for the Canadian Grand Prix to start, Enjoy your dinner
kenneth1955 lee56659
Posted
kenneth1955 derek76
Posted
laura00828 derek76
Posted