Haemochromatosis - Type 4 Ferraportin Disease

Posted , 5 users are following.

Hi,

Glad that i have found this group,

I am waiting for my genetic testing to come back for Type 4 (SLC40A1), it seems to be taking ages for the results to come back - i have already had a negative result for hereditarily haemochromatosis Type 1

Ferritin levels are currently over 5000 on first blood test - iron saturation level 21% - I was tested due to my daughter been diagnosed with high ferritin when she became pregnant 

Are there any other people in this position, what is the likely treatment

​Many thanks in advance  

1 like, 10 replies

10 Replies

  • Posted

    Hello

    I have ferroportin disease and my ferritin was at 5000 with an iron saturation of 30% when I was diagnosed.

    The treatment is the same as for hereditary haemochromatosis except that we are  not bled as often because we risk the chance of becoming anaemic.  I know that sounds crazy when we are overloaded with iron but ferroportin disease does not respond well to phlebotomy.

    I was bled every fortnight and my hb levels were monitored very closely.  My hb was at 12.7 when I began and after ten weeks it dropped to 11.0 and after eighteen weeks it dropped to 10.8.  At that point the nurses needed approval from my consultant to continue with the venesections.  This was because their protocol was to allow the hb to drop to 11.0 only.  I was starting to feel tired and get a few headaches at that point, so my venesections were moved to three weekly.  I felt better but then my ferritin plateaued (not sure of spelling) and it wasn't coming down very much.  The decision was made to put me back to fortnightly and my hb stayed pretty much at the 11.5 to 12.6 mark.  I was pleased about that as I was keen to get my ferritin down as quickly as possible.  Maybe my body was getting used to having 350ml of blood being taken every fortnight.

    The amount of blood taken won't be as much as for hereditary haemochromatosis patients as they can tolerate very frequent venesections.  They generally have 450ml removed at each venesection.  You may be put on a similar amount to me at 350ml each time.

    You will be sent for an ultrasound scan on your abdomen to check for any damage to the liver and other organs. 

    Are you in the UK?  My consultant is in London and I was sent for a ferriscan (an MRI scan that checks for iron in the organs) on my liver and on my heart to see how much iron had been deposited in them.  I had iron overload in my liver but not in my heart.   The reading was 13.7mg/g dry weight, the normal level is 2mg/g dry weight.  I was then referred to a hepatologist to check to see if I had any liver damage.  We discussed about having a liver biopsy but I was not in favour of this, especially as there is another alternative now which is called a fibroscan.  I was sent for one of those.  A fibroscan is a device much like an ultrasound device except that a cylindrical object is used to place on the skin between the ribs.  This then sends a beam to the liver (you feel a thump from the cylindrical object) and a reading comes back.  The higher the result the harder your liver is, meaning that there is damage to the organ.  Mine was at 4.5 which was considered a normal range for my age (I am in my early 50's).  My liver is considered to have slight fibrosis.

    Although our condition is rare and we can't be bled as often as the HH patients, the damage to our organs is not as bad as someone with HH.  As my ferritin was at 5000 I was terrified that I has severe liver damage.  We load iron in the macrophages (you will have to look that up as it is a bit technical for me to explain although Gillian has given a good description on a post of mine) which transports the iron in a different way to HH patients.

    The outlook is positive.  I am now in maintenance phase after three and a half years of venesections.  It took roughly 65 to 70 venesections to get down to a ferritin level of 200.  That is the target for me rather than the 50 or less than 50 for HH patients.

    My only problem is that I am a needle phobe and one look at the standard venesection pack sent me into a panic and left me traumatised after a failed venesection using it.  My veins just aren't big enough to take that size needle.  If you don't like needles you can have a smaller one.  It can be done by a canula and a bag attached.  The needle I have is quite small but I am happy with that.  It takes about 15 to 20 minutes to get the blood out but at least I am not traumatised and it is better for my veins.  You have got to look after them.

    I hope my experience has helped and I hope to communicate regularly with you on this forum to exchange stories, experiences etc.

    Best wishes

    Marie

    • Posted

      Good morning Marie 86421

      Many thanks for your reply, the information has been a big help and has also helped to put my mind at rest

      I am in the UK, on the outskirts of Coventry - I am currently waiting for my SLC40A1 genetic testing results, I was hoping to have my results on the 8th June, however my Haematologists is not sure if they will be available then, apparently there are not many places where this genetic testing can be carried out and may take longer to come back than the six week gap in my visits to him - to date I have had a ultra sound scan on my liver and spleen, my spleen is slightly enlarged followed by an ECO scan on my heart, I am waiting for the results to this too - My Haematologist is trying to organise what he has called a specialised MRI scan for me to check iron level, so maybe this is the Ferriscan that you spoke about, again I should have more information on this when I go for my next check up on the 8th June

      My Haematologists was convinced it was Hereditary Hemochromatosis even though it was confirmed I was not type 1 and started Venesection that day, this happened really quickly less than 10 mins to remove 450 ml of blood, although I was not impressed when I saw the Venesection pack, much as you described, but it was all good in the end, however a couple of days later emailed me to say that he would prefer to abandon the Venesection until the genetic results came back as the treatment was different and did not want to cause other problems, however he did not elaborate 

      I am now in my early fifty’s and just so happy that this has been discovered now and not at a later date, it would appear that my daughter has the same condition as this is how I discovered that I needed to be checked too, when she became pregnant her Ferritin level was just below 2900......  it also makes sense, if it is Type 4, how Ferroportin loss-of-function disease has been passed onto my daughter, as my wife's Ferrtin levels are normal

      I do have a beautiful grandson into the bargain so life is not all bad, Will come back to you with an update after the 8th June 

      Once again my thanks for your comments, speak soon

    • Posted

      Hi Abittight

      Your haematologist is right regarding how you are treated with ferroportin disease.  We cannot tolerate the treatment that HH patients can.

      He may be talking about how much blood is removed, I notice that you had 450ml taken.  That is too much for someone with ferroportin disease.  Did you feel OK after the venesection?  My sister had 450ml taken by mistake and nearly passed out.  The other treatment is chelation therapy.  This removes iron from the body if you are unable to tolerate venesections.  This comes with side affects though.  You will be able to read up about it if you search on google.  I would try for the venesections with a fortnight or three weeks between venesections with 350ml taken out.  See what your haematologist suggests and then you can enter into the discussion.

      My genetic test was done at Oxford University and I had to wait a while for the results as they are done periodically.

      I live near Shrewsbury so not too far away from you.

      Look forward to hearing from you with your ferriscan results.

      Best wishes

      Marie

    • Posted

      Hi Marie,

      Many thanks for the reply, I felt fine after my venesection, no problem at all, apart from been extremely tired the day following - but as I have said before I have only had one venesection prior to it been stopped awaiting the results of the genetic testing - it is the foggy head that I do not seem to be able to shift, it really affects my concentration.

      My genetic tests are currently been completed at the Women’s Hospital in Birmingham, he did mention that if they were unable to complete the tests in Birmingham it would need to go to Oxford, however he did feel that this would not be a problem after he spoke to them

      Best Wishes 

      Richard

  • Posted

    OMG nearly passed out on my last section on Monday - if they must have a novice using your arm as a pin cushion can she please have some sense of direction smile  At one stage there was more blood over the pillow than what was in the bag - must of lost at least 25ml smile Some medical staff must understand if you see a patient wincing and looking pale you do not keep trying to stick the needle in to the vein! Was only that she was not bad looking that I felt oblidged to let her carry on lol
    • Posted

      You can always refuse to let said person do it.  If I have a venesection like that I ask the nurse to stop immediately before I pass out.  Where I go if they have problems another nurse is called and I have a heated bag to put on my arm to get my veins up.  Seems to work for me.

      Hope your next one is better.

      Best wishes

      Marie

    • Posted

      If they are short staffed you have what comes unless of course you go away and come back another day - But for me personally I just want this finished to the point where I'm not sitting in the unit every Wk - it feels like my second home at the mo smile I can only imagine what it feels like for someone whos on chemo every wk it must be soul destroying
  • Posted

    Hello, abittight, welcome to the club!

    First off, I should say that I don't know if I have ferroportin loss-of-function disease or not, as I have not yet been able to get genetic testing done where I live (Canada), but I can’t find any other diagnosis that fits my situation.

    As Marie says, the treatment for ferroportin loss-of-function iron overload is bleeding.  In my experience, slightly smaller amounts are taken than for regular (HFE) haemochromatosis.  The intervals in between phlebotomies gradually have to be increased to give the poor malfunctioning ferroportin enough time to get the next lot of extra iron out of the iron-overloaded cells so the bone marrow can make more blood so one can be bled again.

    Handy hints for phlebotomy include –

    Be really warm.  The warmer you are, the more your peripheral veins dilate.  Nicely dilated veins make it easier to get the needle in, and give more comfortable and faster bleeding.

    Have enough water and salt on board before your phlebotomy.  They usually tell you about drinking lots of water ahead of time, but may not mention that people on a lowish salt diet also need to up their salt intake a day or so before phlebotomy.

    A smaller needle will often do the trick if they put a blood pressure cuff on higher up your arm and keep it inflated just below diastolic pressure to increase the blood flow.

    Hope some of this is helpful!

    Gillian

    PS In case it’s of interest, a summary of my situation -

    I have always had extremely heavy periods (I have some sort of tendency to easy bleeding that one hematologist found to be von Willebrandt's disease type 1 but one hematologist doesn't think it is so who knows).  The heavy regular bleeding pre-hysterectomy – which I estimate at around 350 cc per month - kept my hemoglobin and ferritin at reasonably low levels until I started taking more than the recommended amount of iron with vitamin C, then had a hysterectomy.  After that my ferritin went up - from 387 ug/L in 2004 (the year I had my hysterectomy) to 1438 in Dec 2012.  In May of 2012 my iron saturation was 29%.  Symptoms were extreme fatigue and joint pain.  At first I was considered to have some sort of seronegative autoimmune arthritis but trials of anti-rheumatic drugs didn’t help.  I was then told to see a hematologist to check out my iron status.  My first hematologist felt on a clinical basis that I had some sort of non-HFE iron overload disorder.  She would have done a liver biopsy had it not been for my tendency to easy bleeding, so opted instead for a trial of phlebotomy and planned to order an MRI if the phlebotomy response was consistent with ferroportin loss-of-function disease.  Unfortunately, she left the area shortly after I started phlebotomy.  I was tested for the HFE gene and am normal for C282Y, although I am homozygous for H63D.  (H63D isn’t supposed to cause iron overload, at least not by itself.)

    Starting November 2013, I have now had a total of 25 phlebotomies for a total of 7.45 L of blood removed.  I started out with weekly phlebotomies of 250 cc, then, as I figured out what to do to make phlebotomy more tolerable, worked up to 350 cc.  However, my hemoglobin dropped from about 124 g/L before starting phlebotomy to 111 g/L just prior to my second phlebotomy.  I have gradually had to extend the intervals between phlebotomies and am now having 350-400 cc removed every 5-6 weeks or so.  My hemoglobin has mostly been between 110-118 since.  My last ferritin was 84 ug/L.  Target is 50 ug/L.  However, going by some articles in the medical literature, because the ferroportin isn’t functioning properly to clear excess iron out of the tissues, reaching target ferritin doesn’t necessarily mean that all iron-overloaded tissues have been cleared of the extra iron – you need an MRI for iron to determine that.

    My second hematologist has finally agreed to order an MRI and I just had it done – will get results in a few weeks.

    Liver ultrasound shows that my liver tissue is fine, with no fibrosis.  (The ultrasound also found multiple liver cysts, currently being investigated, not yet diagnosed . . . but I think are most likely E. granulosus cysts related to hanging around with dogs that ate raw moose carcass trimmings.  I mention this just because being checked out for high ferritin may result in incidental findings that probably wouldn’t have ever caused trouble if not found but once found probably should be checked out.)

    • Posted

      Hi Gillian

      Really pleased to hear that you have just had your MRI done.  I shall be interested to see how much iron you have in your liver.

      Best wishes

      Marie

    • Posted

      Hi Gillian, thank you, I appreciate all your comments, your handy hints for phlebotomy are exactly as the nurse said to me that gave me my first and only to date Venesection, so that is comforting to know this she know what she is talking about too 

      I also know what other levels to look out for and monitor if they re-start venesections in the future

      Will update after 8th June

       

      Best Wishes

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.