Has anyone been on Casodex and Eligard?
Posted , 5 users are following.
Im 74, recently diagnosed with Prostate Cancer and will soon start on a multi theraply plan starting with ADT of Casodex (2 weeks) and Eligard ( 6 months), to lower the testosterone. I get seed implants at 2 months and external beam radiation at 5 months. What side-effects did you have to the Casodex or to the Eligard? My health is great, the cancer is confined to the prostate. Gleason scores of 6 and 7.
0 likes, 10 replies
ES28567 aksns61
Posted
If your cancer is confined to your prostate please checkout HIFU and FLA. These procedures are far less invasive and most often do not have the same negative side effects. I'm less than a week out from my HIFU procedure and it's almost like it never even happened. Good luck to you.
aksns61 ES28567
Posted
Thanks for the reply, however my consulting radiologists and urology physicians all agreed that my therapy plan was the best route. I did have a 2nd opinion and was in-line with first 2. I am aware of the complications but these guys have a very high success rate. My husband went through a similar process but had different sequence and was more severe. My options also included doing nothing since my excellent health, physical condition and cancer confined to only the prostate. They all agreed I'd be fine for 5 or 10 years given the slow growth and the advanced age this was discovered. But.. the cancer was found everywhere in the prostate with all scores in the 6 and 7 range. So we elected to take a more aggressive route. I'm an avid skier and mountain climber and am having doubts of these meds slowing me down this winter when I start treatment. These meds are supposed to have fewer problems, but I'm not sure, thus my inquiry to anyone who has taken them. I'll only be on hormone treatment for 6 months max.
Roger2Dodger aksns61
Posted
You and I are about the same age, with exactly the same diagnosis of the PCa. Gleason of 6 and 7. I chose active surivillanc. My biopsy remains were sent to Prolaris for genetic testing. It was determined from the testing that my PCa was in the non aggressive range. With a 3% morality rate of not dying in 10 years. Treatment can be very invasive. With the results from the Prolaris test I chose AS over treatment.
aksns61 Roger2Dodger
Posted
Thanks for your reply. I will ask my doc about the genetic test to determine the agressive nature of my cancer. Im not familiar with Prolaris, nor has anyone suggested it when my biopsy report came in. We do agree on the survival stats for 5 and 10 years. I don't start anything until January.
barney34567 aksns61
Posted
I am 50 and was recently diagnosed with a Gleason 9. I decided in robotic radical prostatectomy. Had I been diagnosed with a 6 or 7 and I was in my 70s, I would choose active surveillance like roger chose.
While it is true as you say that you may have five to ten years of no prostate issues with AS, the fact is that OTHER diseases may cause you problems in the next ten years.
When you say you'll be on hormone therapy for only six months, I think that depends on just how you respond to it. Some folk are on it for three years, with serious side effects.
I would urge you to investigate all the options including AS, radiation, proton etc.
God luck.
Roger2Dodger barney34567
Posted
barney34567 Roger2Dodger
Posted
and at that age I would enjoy life and stay away from invasive treatment, as you have done.
aksns61 barney34567
Posted
Thanks Barney, et. al. The ONLY reason I will be using these hormones is to weaken the cancer, and shrink the prostate - not as a "therapy". The shortest cancer guideline timeframe was 6 months, which takes me to the end of the external beam cycle. My urologist and radiologist agree that once the short course is done, my prostate should begin to return to its functionality. In addition they recommend that I stay as physically active as I can throughout the treatments. As a last step, they will start me on a daily dose of cialis for an undetermined period of time. As itt was explained to me, Eligar has a low impact on the prostate itself. I'll be skiing during the first 4 months of the treatment cycle. Im not sure why the National Cancer Center did not include Proton therapy as an option.
barney34567 aksns61
Posted
i suppose the NCC does not include Proton Therspy is because there is very little evidence of its success compared to surgery, radiation and hormone treatment.
nathan25612 aksns61
Posted
My name is Nathan and I live in Oklahoma City, OK. 5 years ago this past April I finished proton therapy treatment for my prostate cancer. I am now 77 and an advocate for proton thearpy. It's painless and presents no side effects like other treatments do. My Gleason was 7. I urge you to check out proton therapy by going to Procure Cancer Centers on the internet. My PSA is now 0.3 and I have many other friends who have had wonderful results with proton therapy as well. We have a center here in Oklahoma City, OK where I live. I now work there as a Patient Transport for the Center.