Has anyone out there had a "Prostate Artery Embolization??
Posted , 210 users are following.
I had one on September 10th, 2014 and would love to compare notes with anyone else that has had one. Thank You. ChuckP PS Some people just call it a "PAE" for short.
8 likes, 2499 replies
a80940 ChuckP
Posted
Does anyone have info about the EP TURP (ejaculation preserving) that is done in Germany and perhaps in the US.
Thanks
lou051947 a80940
Posted
regards Lou
Ejaculation-preserving transurethral resection of prostate and bladder neck: short- and long-term results of a new innovative resection technique
INTRODUCTION:
Loss of antegrade ejaculation is a risk with conventional resection of the prostate (transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP]). The aim of this study was to determine the short- and long-term preservation of antegrade ejaculation and functional results with the novel ejaculation-preserving TURP (epTURP).
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Prospective evaluation of 89 consecutive patients with bladder outlet obstructions aged 27 to 78 years, enrolled from June 2001 to January 2005. Endpoints were change in objective (uroflowmetry, postvoid residual [PVR]), and subjective (International Prostate Symptoms Score [IPSS], Life Quality Index [LQI]; International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5+] with two additional questions) measures of function. All patients received follow-up examinations at 3 and ≥60 months.
RESULTS:
Overall, 87 and 63 patients were evaluated after 3 and 60 months, respectively. Antegrade ejaculation was preserved in 79 of 87 (90.8%) patients at 3 months. Significant improvements in maximum flow rate (+14.3 mL/s), micturition volume (+71.6 mL), and PVR (-59 mL; p≤0.002 for all) were observed at 3 months. Micturition symptoms, as measured by IPSS and LQI, were also significantly reduced (mean change of 18.3 and 2.9, respectively; p<0.001). improvements were maintained at 60 months. no serious adverse events were reported. eight (12.7%) patients received a second epturp due to the development of bladder neck scar tissue during long-term follow-up.
conclusion:
antegrade ejaculation was preserved with the use of epturp with excellent outcome. observed symptomatic and functional outcomes were comparable with conventional turp. the results from this study underline the necessity of reviewing the old concept of ejaculation physiology. improvements="" were="" maintained="" at="" 60="" months.="" no="" serious="" adverse="" events="" were="" reported.="" eight="" (12.7%)="" patients="" received="" a="" second="" epturp="" due="" to="" the="" development="" of="" bladder="" neck="" scar="" tissue="" during="" long-term="" follow-up.="" conclusion: ="" antegrade="" ejaculation="" was="" preserved="" with="" the="" use="" of="" epturp="" with="" excellent="" outcome.="" observed="" symptomatic="" and="" functional="" outcomes="" were="" comparable="" with="" conventional="" turp.="" the="" results="" from="" this="" study="" underline="" the="" necessity="" of="" reviewing="" the="" old="" concept="" of="" ejaculation="">0.001). improvements were maintained at 60 months. no serious adverse events were reported. eight (12.7%) patients received a second epturp due to the development of bladder neck scar tissue during long-term follow-up.
conclusion:
antegrade ejaculation was preserved with the use of epturp with excellent outcome. observed symptomatic and functional outcomes were comparable with conventional turp. the results from this study underline the necessity of reviewing the old concept of ejaculation physiology.>
caringbah a80940
Posted
Lou has answered this for you. My question is why you would want to have a TURP , EP or otherwise when there are much better options available ?
Turp is a barbaric procedure and you still have a significant chance of incontinence and or impotence.
I had a PAE 7 months ago and I pee like a horse again. No cutting, no impotence, no incontinence , no retro and in fact my sexual function has improved ...better erections and sensitivity.
Check out Prostate Artery Embolisation.
ramakant16481 caringbah
Posted
Your words are music to my ears. P*ssing like a horse again has been my dream for 10+ years while on the "watchful wait" bench as per med advice.
So happy to hear of your great outcome from PAE. I wish your improvement continues.
I gather from quick read of the posts that you did this in Sydney on medicare - is that right ?
I am in Melbourne, have been searching but found no interventional radiologists that perform this in state system.
Do you mind giving me the contact details of the surgeon in Sydney ?
I'm new on this forum, is there a PM channel I can use to receive info ?
Cheers
Rama
bob120 a80940
Posted
Emis_Moderator ramakant16481
Posted
"is there a PM channel I can use to receive info ?"
Yes, see link below which should be used to exchange any specific details as you have requested.
http://patient.uservoice.com/knowledgebase/articles/398331-private-messages
Regards,
Alan
Camster caringbah
Posted
What is being worked on now is intraprostatic injections for BPH. There are two companies in Phase 3 clinical trials. Another company is using this method in South America. This is being done in the doctor's office for a 15 minute visit.
bob120 Camster
Posted
ramakant16481 Emis_Moderator
Posted
I tried sendind a PM, does PM content get moderated before forwarding ?
Just a bit surprised that my PM got no reply even though the person I sent to offered to reply with info about a particular facility foe PAE.
Cheers
Rama
Camster bob120
Posted
nealpros Camster
Posted
Neal
caringbah ramakant16481
Posted
i replied twice to the email address you supplied.,
Can you try again? Maybe it was a typo or try checking your junk mail.
Cheers
a80940 caringbah
Posted
Thanks so much for your quick response. I had a PAE 7 months ago at UNC. Can't say enough good things about Dr. I. Unfortunatley it only helped a little, I'm guessing because of the large median lobe going into the bladder. The prostate is presenly at 117 down from 140. I've been in touch with a Dr. in Germany (Saladin Alloussi), very responsive, who has been doing the EP TURP for 20 years, I'm told with a 90 percent sucess rate. I'm also told with a large prostate it may not be as effective, but conversely if the main blockage is the median lobe then the odds go up for no retro. Not sure what else to try. Need to be cath free. Glad your PAE went well. How large was your prostate?
a80940 lou051947
Posted
Thanks so much for your quick response. I had a PAE 7 months ago at UNC. Can't say enough good things about Dr. I. Unfortunatley it only helped a little, I'm guessing because of the large median lobe going into the bladder. The prostate is presenly at 117 down from 140. I've been in touch with a Dr. in Germany (Saladin Alloussi), very responsive, who has been doing the EP TURP for 20 years, I'm told with a 90 percent sucess rate. I'm also told with a large prostate it may not be as effective, but conversely if the main blockage is the median lobe then the odds go up for no retro. Not sure what else to try. Need to be cath free. Glad your PAE went well. How large was your prostate?
arlington a80940
Posted
Good luck!
a80940 arlington
Posted
My prostate is 117 which I think is too large plus the median lobe I believe rules out the Urolift. Have not self cath yet but need to try that. Not heard of the Gat/Goren... I'll look into that as well as the EP TURP.
Thanks and best of luck to you as well!
nealpros a80940
Posted
Neal
ramakant16481 caringbah
Posted
I got the info, many thanks, called and waiting to be given an appointment.
The uro had done a cystoscopty 1.5 yrs ago. I need to go and dig details out of him, but vaguely recall the issue as being a tight bladder neck due to prostate growth. As of last consultation with the uro, he told me with certainty that I will lose ejaculation (not so wrried about fertility, I'm past all that at 57). I'm seriously concrend about incotinence and impotence risk.
Does PAE help where prostate growth blocks the bladder neck ? Don't know the answer to that one, but hope to find out from the good doc when I meet him.
Cheers
Rama
caringbah ramakant16481
Posted
Im with you...I was saw three different urologists...one reccomend TURP , the other laser and the last , a woman , wanted to do open surgery on me for BPH! I just about ran out of her rooms.
Thank God I discovered this forum and PAE.
Like you I was worried about incontince and impotence but PAE put an end to those fears.
Keep us posted on how you go with Doc Schlapoff.
arlington a80940
Posted
ramakant16481 caringbah
Posted
I've been reading the topic with interest. Lots of success stories, but a few with dose of reality. Some of us in the end learn to manage our lifestyles around the problem. This forum has been invaluable to me so far.
I've got an appointment with Doc Sclapoff on 1st March (Thanks to quick info from Carinbah). Need to organise ticks and p'haps a night's accommodation. I assume this is for pre-op MRI, artery mapping and all the good stuff. So I might be headed back to Melb same evening.
No details yet, but I assume the procedure will not be done same day.
At 57 years, I'm approaching this with guraded optimism. I've had symptoms getting progressively worse for over 10 years. Diagnosis is not clear to me, different uro's have rule OAB, tight bladder neck and more recently - prostate overgrown (50-60gm) requiring TURP, that being the only option as per current uro. Few months ago, retention became bad, eGFR declined to 41 with hydronephrosis, so the GP (he is the best supportive GP I've ever been to) suggested Flowmaxtra to keep the kidneys in the clear. A month of precautions (emtying the ballder even if it takes long) and flowmaxtra brought the eGFR upto near normal level of 57. last ultra-sound also showed a PVR of 350 ml. Due for a re-scan and another blood test next week before apptt with Doc for PAE workup. Let's wait and see.
The uro is definitive about TURP being the only solution, retro almost a certain consequence. Incotinence is unlikely result of TURP as per him, but I don;t know, that's the most worrying result for me. Impotence, ED are strong possibilies fromTURP. I've heard stories of men going into long term depression from these. Perhaps there is both a psychological and biochemical link to.
Flowmaxtra seems to be keeping me away from catheterisation and hopefully from kidney damage, I will find out soon.
I am looking forward to the PAE workup, fingers ccrossed.
This might be an outrageously silly question. Has anyone explored other options like PEMF ? A google on "PEMF for prostate" will bring up an article about PEMF results on dogs at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145661/
This one appears to show results on humans :
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21537858
Once again, this sort of treatment could be carried out as a DIY procedure or with minimu supervision. You have to be careful, as there are several Co's trying to flog some very expensive PEMF machines, which may or may not work.
I am out and about on the internet, exploring other avenues in case PAE turns out to be not for me. Love to hear from anyone who has been down these streets.
bob120 ramakant16481
Posted
I was in a similar position 4 years ago. PVR of 400ml, urinating every 20 minutes at work and on the commute, frequent retention at night needing self catheterization. Flomax worked for about three months and just as the side effects disappeared, so did the effectiveness. I had the complications of a very large prostate over 120g. a large 40 g. median lobe protruding into the bladder, and an overgrown bladder neck, as well as bladder stones and a propensity for uncontrolled hematuria. I also went into my GL procedure with hope and optimism, but it took an additional GL and an additional classic turp in the space of three years to address all the complications and give me a decent stream, pvr less than 35 ml, and the ability to go 2 hours or more in the day and only get up twice a night. I wish you the best on the PAE. Like all other procedures it works for some and not for others, depending on the actual cause and complications at work. If the PAE works you will avoid all the side effects of the surgical procedures. If not, you will have to start over in your search.
I also feared incontinence which disappeared in about 6 weeks to two months after each procedure. It was never full on incontinence, just severe urgency (talking about a 10 second count down) and severe dribbling which required pads for 6 to 8 weeks. I greatly feared retro would diminish my enjoyment of sex. I didn't get it until the third surgery, a classic turp. I didn't fear ED because I already had it. Let me just say there are many ways to give and receive sexual enjoyment without being able to maintain a full erection.
bob120
Posted
Although I didn't say it above, for me the retro was a total non event. I have no way to objectively judge the before and after retro levels of enjoyment, but as far as I can tell in the present, it had no effect on me at all.
ramakant16481 bob120
Posted
Thanks for sharing your journey. Overgrown ballder neck rings a bell.
Many positives there, glad to hear that you got it flowing, I know it must be a big relief, makes the long and hard journey worth, no doubt.
If I may ask, did the 2 GL's provide any improvment (albeit non-lasting) ? I did quiz my uro about GL, he advised it would not work for me. Did you end up doing anything about the bladder stones after the 2 GL's ?
I think the uro's don't have enough of a clue to know beforehand how effective the procedure might be. In my uro's opinion, only a mistake by the surgeon can result in incontinence. Chosing Medicare means I have no control over which surgeon gets to wield the knife. Could potentially be a newbie med grad plus few TURP's undr the belt. PAE certainly sounds low risk, not the leats due to the fact that the surgeon is known and has done many succesful ops.
I am also consulting a TCM, giving it a go while waiting for PAE assessment, also continue to explore the PEMF possibilities.
bruce19007 ramakant16481
Posted
nealpros bob120
Posted
Neal
bob120 nealpros
Posted
I'm not really concerned about the erection. I'm mostly concerned about the orgasm, and sharing intimacy, and so far, so good. Vigara and Cialis gave me erections but they removed the sensitivity and for me it felt like shining shoes. A lot of energetic back and forth but not much sensation and not much intimacy. But thank you for your concern.
Bob
bob120 ramakant16481
Posted
It sounds like you are in Australia. In the U.S. we can choose our surgeon on Medicare, so I didn't have that consideration.
I would say both of the 180 watt Greenlight laser turps did an incomplete job. About six months after the first GL I started having problems again. A membrane had grown over my external sphincter (at the prostate connection to the urethra) which my urologist removed with the cystoscope and local anesthetic. But I needed to self catheterize once a month "to keep the channel open". During the following year my stream was weird. To me it felt like I had broken pipes. I would lean one way and the other to empty out. After the year I had my first uncontrolled hematuria. I went into the hospital and my urologist used the GL laser again. While he was in there, her removed more tissue from my prostate and the median lobe protruding into my bladder, cauterized three bleeders on my prostate and bladder neck, and did a resection of the bladder neck. While he was cleaning out blood clots that covered my bladder walls he saw a bunch of bladder stones and so he removed them as well. The following 15 months saw improved flow, but still not a really good flow after the first few months after healing.
At the end of the 15 months I got a second uncontrolled hematuria and was back in hospital. This time my urologist was unable to schedule a GL laser machine so he did the classic turp. He removed a large amount of tissue from my prostate, and removed the rest of the median lobe which was still protruding into my bladder, and stopped the bleeders. An advantage of the turp compared to the GL is that tissue is not evaporated, so it can be sent to pathology which he did, and it came back as not cancerous. But two weeks after being released the hematuria came back and as my urologist was out of the country I used the hospital urologist who stopped the bleeding. I continued to bleed two more weeks and was about to go for another surgery to stop the bleeding when it stopped on it's own the day before the surgery was scheduled. (The normal bleeding after a procedure turns the urine a burgundy color, but I had frank blood which is more like a Marinara sauce color.)
For the past 10 months my stream has finally been good. But three months ago I started taking dutasteride to stop my prostate from continuing to grow when an ultrasound measured my pvr as 35ml and my prostate size as 203g. I really didn't want another surgery. I still have low iron 10 months later, and my hemoglobin and red blood cells finally got into the normal range about a month ago. The dutasteride put me over the top with really forceful streams like I haven't had in 20 years, and cut my night urinations from 4 or 5 to 2. If you are taking meds anyway I would add the dutasteride. TCM may work but I would be surprised if it could work as well as dutasteride an flomax together. Given a choice between a GL and a turp I would go for the turp. The recuperation was shorter (6 weeks instead of 8 or 9), less painful, and the results were better.
jjsmnow ramakant16481
Posted
That was not a problem for me.
I have regular govt medicare and was able to choose my surgeon.
Are u on a medicare advange plan and stuck in a group of doctors in ur area?,
When u have the regular govt medicare u can go to any doctor in the usa who accepts govt medicare not so with the advantage plans,
To me anyone who has the advantage plans, is gambling with there health.
jjsmnow arlington
Posted
arlington jjsmnow
Posted
bob120 jjsmnow
Posted
nealpros bob120
Posted
Neal
bob120 nealpros
Posted
ramakant16481 jjsmnow
Posted
ramakant16481 bob120
Posted
Thanks for sharing your experience. Will investigate duasteride.
I agree with you about intimacy etc.
My own experience is that one's focus can move away from the physical aspect of intimacy. I personally think that is a great part of growing older but we are all different.
Im looking forward to apptt with doc schlapof in a week.
A bit surprised that noone expressed much interest in pemf. The paper published on humans probably conains details of frequencies and intensities but I cant find the full paper free, might buy it one off price of $39.
ramakant16481 caringbah
Posted
I spoke to the doc's admin assistant today (Alda).
Dr Scahlapof has till date performed 15 PAE ops. Apparently after 20, he will start charing around 10k per op. It all depends on if I can squeeze in before his score reaches 20. She said I wll most likely make it before the golden mark, tentative op date around mid-March. Seems like the procedure isn't medicare apporved yet.
After talking to her (she was not so communicative) I felt somewhat cool towards the whole idea, perhaps I am rushing it too much.
I know you had a great outcome with the doc, but I can't help feeling a bit like a guinea pig, just my gut reaction I guess.
Hmm I'm in two minds about this now, just want to sleep over it and may be I'll wake up feeling different.
caringbah ramakant16481
Posted
Sam05687 ramakant16481
Posted
Thought i might add that i was Number 10.. November 2015. And am happy with the outcome. No urgency, back to normal behaviour, three months on. Drs and support staff were excellent in their respective roles.
i am very happy i found out about PAE through this site and for those who were participating and offering information. The alternative treatment TURP in whatever form was too brutal to contemplate.
Rama i suggest you discuss your thoughts and concerns with Dr Catts or Dr Schaplof and they will be in a better position to address your concerns and issues. I did that and found the discussions very helpful.
all the best in your deliberations .
caringbah Sam05687
Posted
Better make your move quick Rama. :-)
I agree with you Sam. The alternatives were too horrible to contemplate.
In the end what swung me was this. I had to do something. Why not go with the best procedure first. If it doesn't work I could always go to Laser or TURP.
Camster ramakant16481
Posted
bob120 Camster
Posted
lou051947 bob120
Posted
Not sure how one would proceed to treat them self without proper supper vision.
I had my PAE last Thursday by Dr. Bagla and after 2 plus days have started to fell much better. We shall see if the proceedure works as noted by others here. I am still on flowmax and will wait at least 2-3 weeks before stopping it.
Lou
bob120 lou051947
Posted
lou051947 bob120
Posted
THANKS FOR THE WELL WISHES.
LOU
caringbah lou051947
Posted
Day four was THE day for me. All discomfort gone and improving all the time.
caringbah lou051947
Posted
Day four was THE day for me. All discomfort gone and improving all the time.
lou051947 caringbah
Posted
caringbah lou051947
Posted
i didn't need any extra pain meds...pain was minor and all gone after four days.
Sam05687 lou051947
Posted
So far the outlook has been positive for me and i had my PAE in November 2015.
lou051947 Sam05687
Posted
thanks for the reply. Where did you get yours done?
william79680 Sam05687
Posted
lou051947 william79680
Posted
best lou
Sam05687 lou051947
Posted
ramakant16481 caringbah
Posted
My ticks to Sydney are booked for the 1st March.
Thanks for the encoraging posts.
Cheers
nealpros bob120
Posted
Neal
caringbah ramakant16481
Posted
I think your chances of having a hassle free successful procedure are much higher with PAE than any of the other options plus you're getting it for free.
What could be better.:-)
Sam05687 ramakant16481
Posted
I am sure the process will not be daunting ensure that you prepare all the questions you need to to ask the Doctors regarding PAE.