Have an appointment tomorrow with highly regarded Cataract Dr... any suggestions.
Posted , 10 users are following.
Been living with a cataract in 1 eye for about 2 years. Made an appointment with Dr Tal Raviv NYC for tomorrow. My research shows he is highly regarded & uses FEMTOSECOND LASER . Uses ORA. Any suggestions from members for this 1st visit? Questions etc.
0 likes, 51 replies
dennis39810
Posted
Had consultation earlier today with Dr Tal Raviv. From my limited... just one other eye Dr office but many other MD offices... I found Eye Center of NY to be very efficient with very little wait time. Many more eye tests then I was used to were done by his staff & another optometrist prior to the consultation with Dr Raviv. Dr Raviv explained the procedure (I was pretty knowledgeable because of all my prior research) he answered all my pre-written questions (thanks Ed for the tip & basic questions). He then did additional examination & looked at the cataract eye with ultra sound.
I questioned him about Zeiss Lara or Lisa & he said they won't be around in USA for many years. He went thru my IOL options & said the Symfony IOL will be the best choice (it was the most costly choice $6M additional), I brought up that Symfony patients were bothered by halo/starburst. His answer was that they are much improved today & only 10% of his patients experienced this problem.
I contracted for surgery implanting Symfony IOL. My remaining decision is which of the 2 facilities Dr Raviv uses to pick for my surgery. I was told they both have same equipment. New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai or Retina Ambulatory Surgery Center- will have to some more research on which to choose. If any member has any experience with either please let me know.
Thank you for members for all your advice.
Sue.An dennis39810
Posted
I do have good vision with them from 11 inches beyond. Good light is essential - but I can read even J1 type on Snellen chart. Given options today I would still choose them even knowing about the night time visuals. At 53 I work full time and am very active - that played a big part too in my decision.
Wish you all the best. Keep us updated.
soks dennis39810
Posted
During the surgery he showed me the picture of the circles around street light. The earlier optometrist also said that all the reported side effects can happen.
soks Sue.An
Posted
The power calculations for Symfony are same as Technis monofocal with IOL master so I don't think much would have changed there.
Sue.An soks
Posted
dennis39810 Sue.An
Posted
Sounded to me like there is an improvement in the lens design itself. I did not question the doctors comment after I asked about halos /starbursts. But I may contact Abbott & see if that is confirmed?
Sue when you say you need good light... does that mean you have problems in normal room light or driving at night? How are colors viewed?
Sue.An dennis39810
Posted
Colours I think are natural and normal however my cataracts caused everything to have a yellow/Brown tint. This was especially noticeable after first operation when I could compare. Colours were especially bright with Symfony. But that is also when I compared reading in low lit conditions. In low light my naturalneye could read whereas I need e tea lighting with Symfony eye.
I am not sure if you call Abbott if they’d admit Symfony causes halos (concentric rings) around certain light sources - they didn’t mention them even after trials. Perhaps their subjects didn’t drive much. But at 53 I work still full time and drive plenty at night. Living in Canada it is dark driving home after work November to February.
The rings are visible on the Symfony lenses - what provides the elongated focus (like a camera) so I am not sure how that design changed in the year since I was implanted with them.
Do t want to alarm you but if you are opting for them thinking you won’t see the concentric circles you may be quite annoyed with your doctor for not being forthright about it. There is a compromise as far as I am concerned when choosing g to be more glasses independent.
Sue.An
Posted
I really want you to be aware of these concentric circles that appear at dusk and night time around certain light sources. Starting at 50 yards or so and then disappear as you get nearer the light source. If you are going on the words of your doctor then you may be disappointed. Again I am very happy with Symfony lenses but they aren’t perfect due to the concentric circles. I do drive at night and have been able to adapt. Given choices of lenses available today in Canada I would still choose them. But have to be frank - I am a little perturbed by surgeons underplaying the night time halos. And you are paying $6K (not sure if that is one eye or both). In Canada everything was covered and I paid the difference between a monofocal and Symfony Lens ($900 Canadian - at today’s exchange rate is 28% less than USD). With the kind of money you are paying I would want the surgeon to be motivated by more than money and inform me of the pros and cons of the IOLs.
Again not trying to alarm you but do want you to be fully aware of Symfony’s night time halos. My own surgeon didn’t relay the huge concentric circles but did take the time to say there is a compromise to make with Symfony lenses and there were more halos than a monofocal. In fact he met with me twice prior to surgery which was unusual for Canada as our Medicare system although generous doesn’t allow for a lot of consult time. He said at the age I am I will be somewhat unhappy and it will be a compromise no matter which lens I chose. For older patients who’ve experienced a lot of vision decline they gain something lost years ago but someone in their early 50’s and myself who was not experiencing presbyopia yet I would have to choose what to lose.
He never once pushed me towards a monofocal or a premium lens. I will say after my 2nd surgery at 24 hour post op when he handed me the reading chart and I could read all the way to smallest print (I had tears in my eyes) and he was very pleased with the result and he commented he knew how hard the decision was for me and he was exact same age as myself he would have made same lens choice. But he did remind me before I left the hospital that I would see halos at night and to give it time as it would get better.
I would much rather make a decision with all the facts than be bitter afterwards and wonder why no one said anything.
Thankfully you’ve come on the forums and gained some insight prior to surgery.
Sue.An dennis39810
Posted
If you’d like info from another top cataract and cornea specialist in Singapore I encourage you to google Dr Por Yong Ming (cannot paste links here) but google him and Symfony Lens as he has a specific blog about that lens as well as others and after blog you can post a question - he answers these himself. But he does talk about drop in contrast and halos. Here is a copy and paste of a few of his comments:
2. Because of light sitting there is a drop in contrast compared with a monofocal lens. Patients with multifocal lenses tend to be more sensitive to low light conditions-ie when it starts to get a little dark, they start to feel the drop in vision faster than patients with monofocal lenses. A person with a monofocal lens and reading glasses could read in dimmer conditions than a person with a multifocal lens.
3. The rings on the IOL give rings of light (halos) around light sources. This can be an issue when driving at night because of the halos around car headlamps. Having said this, many patients get used to the halos and do not notice it as much after a time.
Last but not least, there is the Symfony lens which I covered in my last post. As mentioned, this is an 'in between' lens, ie in between a monofocal and a multifocal. It has no intermediate vision problems, and less halos than the usual multifocals, but does not give quite as good very near vision.
Currently, I offer patients a choice between a monofocal, an in between lens like the Symfony, and a full fledged trifocal like the AT LISA tri. I believe there is little to no benefit to be gained from using older bifocals such as the Restor and Tecnis Multifocal currently. Exactly which of those 3 choices gets implanted comes after a careful discussion with my patient regarding the pros and cons of each option. (So that we get big smiles all round afterwards!)
soks Sue.An
Posted
I don't think the Symfony lens has improved either. I don't know why Dr. Raviv may have said that.
My ZXR00 IOL (Symfony) calculation is the same as my ZCB00 IOL (Technis Aspheric Monofocal) calculation at 16D. Hence I think that the calculation do not vary for Technis.
On another note, Dr. Por Ming indicated that Zeiss IOLs have higher PCO rates and also the plate haptic shape does not fit all capsules.
dennis39810 soks
Posted
That is the Lara & Lisa have higher PCO rates? Guess all IOL's have compromises from your original
natural eyes.
Sue.An soks
Posted
soks dennis39810
Posted
Else the multi/EDoF has longer range but night time artifacts.
soks Sue.An
Posted
The circles will probably be an improvement on my current night time light mushrooms.
Sue.An soks
Posted
The concentric circles don’t appear around every light source - I haven’t experienced them inside my home. They are big - from traffic lights they extend to the ground but as car gets nearer the circles get smaller and then when car is stopped at light they disappear. They also do t appear on every light. Car brakes for example when I am travelling behind vehicles don’t have the circles but if the driver applies the brakes I do see them. I don’t see them around overhead streetlights either.
You will notice them but as time passes you get used to seeing them and tune them out.
I know it’s a hard choice to make. I guess I figure my time is spent more in other activities vs driving at night so would rather see better most of the time. Really individual choice and each person may place a different preference on that. I do think though no matter which you decide - most people get satisfactory results and you will adapt. I honestly think there is more than one right solution.
britkennels Sue.An
Posted
Well put, Sue.An. I think part of the problem is that there are docs who will gloss over the nightly things while extolling the benefits. It's totally up to us to decide whether or not the risks outweigh the benefits. For me, the vision headaches and 1001 other problems made life hell. It was worth the risk. For others, maybe work won't allow necessary compromises. Regardless, you're absolutely right when you say we learn to adapt. I'm so thankful we live in a time when cataract surgery doesn't mean coke bottle glasses!
jantje32476 soks
Posted
Seeing the amazing results of bK and her husband, and the good feedback here from Nz and possibly Jn, Zeiss IOLs are quite promising.
The same source also mentions that FINeVision IOLs and Mini WELL IOLs are perhaps more suitable for those requiring a lot of night driving. Those with a love for reading, gardening or requiring long hours spent on computers, then LISA tri, AcrySof IQ PanOptix are good choice. Those with very high myopia, the choice of large diameter IOLs should be considered.
soks jantje32476
Posted
soks
Posted
dennis39810 jantje32476
Posted
Sue.An jantje32476
Posted
Again everyone has to decide what’s best for them, with knowledge and funds they have. But there are no guarantees all works out.
dennis39810 Sue.An
Posted
jantje32476 Sue.An
Posted
jantje32476 dennis39810
Posted
Hi denniss39810, I really like atLISA's specifications, but 2 studies (done in Czech and Madrid Spain) confirmed the Nd:YAG capsulotomy rate of 33% and reaching a probability of 35% for eyes with a follow-up of 34 to 44 months. It seems that neither Zeiss IOLs nor any other trifocal lenses are available in the US. Potvin R (Science in Vision, Akron, NY, USA) and another Ophthalmologist from Norway concluded that PanOptix is the winner, as it has better intermediate vision at 60 cm. "This may be important to users of tablets and other handheld devices." How did Dr Potvin came to this conclusion unless he has been implanting PX or FV on his US patients?
Sue.An jantje32476
Posted
soks Sue.An
Posted
jantje32476 Sue.An
Posted
Is there something I could do to prevent it? I get tired so easily that I find myself compressing my thoughts in half-a-sentence that often does not make sense or distorts the meaning. Last night while watching a concert on DVD for the umpteenth times, I saw the audiences beaming red light emitting devices at the musicians on stage. Then I heard my husband said those were "heart-shaped" toys. .. shock .. the devil is in the detail (Symfony)!
Sue.An jantje32476
Posted
So don’t worry about whether it will or won’t happen. I am a year out and don’t think I have any PVO. I will see my regular optometrist in January and ask her about it.
They say YAG is simple, uncomplicated procedure - but then again some here on the forums who have had it said their eyesight is worse afterwards not better - so that does make me worry a bit.
Night-Hawk Sue.An
Posted
soks dennis39810
Posted
Did you research between NYEE and the retinal ambulatory center?
dennis39810 soks
Posted
Found minimal info & no ratings on ambulatory center. They do not have a direct web site. Seems that a group of ophthalmologists created the center in same building as their practice. NYEE had real bad ratings for walk in eye emergency procedures... much better for patients with pre-appointments with their Dr's. On the paper work they gave me from Dr Raviv's office- said if you have emergency go to NYEE. Dr Raviv does about 10 surgeries a day. Hoping all will be OK with Dr Raviv & NYEE so I booked NYEE which seemed to be my best choice.
soks dennis39810
Posted
Also, how old are you?
dennis39810 soks
Posted