Hip replacement and tattoos
Posted , 6 users are following.
I had THR 14 years ago. Is it safe for me to get a tattoo?
0 likes, 8 replies
Posted , 6 users are following.
I had THR 14 years ago. Is it safe for me to get a tattoo?
0 likes, 8 replies
We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.
Goldencloud claudine49552
Posted
Yes it is. I'm herring one soon and its only been a little over a year.
AlexandriaGizmo claudine49552
Posted
I think the question is, is it safe to get a tattoo full stop, so long as it's a registered business, it passes health and safety visit's, has good reviews and uses all new needles and inks for your tattoos and if it's a big tattoo that needs repeat visits they give you the inks to take home to keep safe, or they decant it into small containers that they throw away after the session.
So having a tattoo is not the question it's whether it's safe to have one whether you have had a HR or not.
If your even remotely worried as your surgeon or GP, what are you thinking of having.
ptolemy claudine49552
Posted
This is rare but it can travel towards your fake joint. It is called Acute hematogenous infection and it occurs in a previously well-functioning joint years after the surgery. The hip joint is most susceptible to this rare joint infection during the first 2 post-op years. You could ask for some anti biotics after the tattoo which should ensure against infection.
Once the infection has settled in the hip joint, antibiotic-only treatment is not effective. Once the bacteria settle on the joint surface, they quickly produce a slime envelope that protects them against the action of antibiotics. The surgeon must remove the infected prosthesis plus the surrounding tissues to get rid of the slime-forming bacteria. Once the hip has been removed, the antibiotic will be effective in getting rid of the remaining bacteria. The technique most often used is done in two operations. First the joint is surgically removed and it is replaced with a big wad of bone cement impregnated with antibiotics called a spacer. Then the patient is without a hip for a period of time (several weeks) while taking massive doses of antibiotics. In the second surgery, called a "revision" a new prosthesis is implanted which may involve bone grafts, cement to fill the empty spaces. Antibiotic treatment continues after the second surgery.
AlexandriaGizmo ptolemy
Posted
That's enough to put anyone off having a tattoo LOL what if they already have one before op do they slice it off eeek
ptolemy AlexandriaGizmo
Posted
wendy39051 claudine49552
Posted
breeze61 claudine49552
Posted
Why risk anything that could poison your system. But, there again, I can't understand the need for people to tattoo themselves, what does it prove.
AlexandriaGizmo breeze61
Posted
I didn't think it was a risk as I knew the tattooist and I knew/know their track record was and still is impeccable, as you asked why did I have it done, well it certainly wasn't to prove anything to myself or to anyone else for that matter.
I see it as a personal choice and will definitely have another when I make up my mind what it's to be.
Each to their own and live and let live is my motto, so long as it doesn't cost the government or taxpayers anything I'm good with it.