How risky/safe is taking Avodart (Dutasteride)?
Posted , 13 users are following.
My urologist asked me to take Avodart for 3 months to see how much it can shrink my 71 gram prostate, then possibly follow up with the Rezum procedure. My prostate grew from 60 grams to 71 grams in the 16 months between MRI's. (Prostate cancer ruled out with biopsy about 18 months ago, but did find I have a median lobe.)
Long story overall, but I'm 54 years old, urination difficulties started about 3 years ago, and it's very intermittent. Most days urination is decent, I only get up once per night, but then about one day per week I'll have a day or two where I can barely urinate at all, and might be in the bathroom every hour until it finally starts to flow. I've had a few mornings where I couldn't urinate at all for several hours, despite a massive urge.
My question is about the risk of taking Avodart. I've seen studies that show the majority of side effects occur in the first few months of taking it, and can be permanent. And I've seen a few comments in this forum from people who've had problems, and call it "chemical castrations".
I'd definitely appreciate any inputs based on experiences with this drug...
0 likes, 24 replies
Coigach steve07664
Posted
I can't report on the basis of having taken it, but in laying it before me as a possible option the consultant was at pains to emphasise that though not every patient would suffer all the potential side-effects, if I were to go on Dutasteride I would have to be prepared to accept the possibility that I might experience significant breast development and inability to achieve an erection.
As my biopsies were negative I decided on the basis of the information available to me to continue with a suprapubic catheter. The idea of having my chest irradiated in order to reduce the risk or extent of breast growth didn't exactly appeal to me either.
derek76 Coigach
Posted
Coigach derek76
Posted
Indeed there are other drugs which can cause breast growth. And there's the fact, uncomfortable as it may be, that something like 70% of 60 year old males have significant breast growth.
derek76 Coigach
Posted
I had not noticed that on our local beach. But Is it breast growth or fat?
I've had tenderness quite a few times and growth on about three occasions.
breeze61 Coigach
Posted
Hi,
I started taking dutasteride at about age 56 in conjunction with Tamsulosin but in a 13 years period I only took it for a total of about 16 months. I would take it for a few months in which time it had shrunk the prostate so that I was almost peeing normally again and then stop for a year os so until the problems came back and I would go on it again, and so on. The longest I took it for was some 7 months during the second half of the last year when my prostate had got to 70 mgrammes and thats when my breasts started to get tender. That's when I pushed for a HoLEP procedure and so glad I did.
I should have had it done earlier to save myself a desperate, sleepless last 6 months before the op and possibly damage from the long term use of these pills. The pills do work effectively and buy you time before getting the op of your choice.
Good luck in your decision, only you can make the decision but If I had private health I would have got seen to ealrlier.
william10248 steve07664
Posted
steve07664 william10248
Posted
TKM steve07664
Posted
j12080 steve07664
Posted
the drugs cause long lasting sexual side effects not good for a 54 year old man.
steve07664 j12080
Posted
I totally get this. I've done a fair amount of research, and honestly nothing looks all that safe or effective. I talked to one of the four urologists I've seen about FLA, and he was pretty much against it. Did you have any permanent side effects after FLA?
j12080 steve07664
Posted
No side effects from my procedure everything works just as I wanted it to work. That my number one interest. If I had not been confident of that then I would not have done the procedure . Of course also I never took any of the drugs that a lot of the guys on this thread talk about. I did not take them because I was afraid of the side effects. I truly believe the side effects from those drugs are to some degree are ever lasting and I did not want any of that.
No urologist will ever recommend FLA procedure. They will not even tell you about it to replace a blind 12 needle biopsy which it can you do very easily and much more effectively. Most of them have never heard of it or of the prostate artery embolization .
Yes you talked to 4 urologist who were all against f l a procedure did you by chance ask any of them if they had any education in it or were able to do the f l a laser procedure or even run the 3T MRI? They are not trained in this and they do not understand it furthermore they are all concerned it may cut into their revenue . I have a good friend who is a urologist in Indiana and who is about to go on the Senior Golf Tour he admitted that urologist know nothing about doing a procedure on the prostate using an MRI guided device. This is is the main reason urologist are this procedure, they cannot perform it. If they could they would have adopted it a long time ago especially FLA for cancer. I will look up the statistics again but I believe the number the last time I looked at it there was 15,000 urologist across the medical industry. In U.S. and 2.300 Interventional Radiologist. We got about 5 that specialize in prostate treatments. Don't expect much support. They have had 11 years of good FLA results in cancer treatment. The urologist look at you strange if you mention it for PCa.
dbhumie1 steve07664
Posted
alanatcroydon steve07664
Posted
Have a look at https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/8917/smpc and the outcomes of clinical trial
steve07664 alanatcroydon
Posted
derek76 steve07664
Posted