I have no idea which lens to choose!! Please help!

Posted , 16 users are following.

Hello, I am a 48 year old female who very recently found out that I have cataracts in both eyes! My left eye has quite a significant one and the right eye has just a bit (but the surgeon says I'll probably want it done as well as it will eventually need it regardless). So, I have been reading all of the literature and online reviews of these different options. My last Rx was -4.00 OD/-4.25 OS with a progressive Rx for reading of +1.75 corrected to 20/20 in both. The eye surgeon says its now more like corrected 20/50 in the left and 20/30 in the right. I have been wearing glasses/contacts for many years. I really cannot drive at night anymore, so I don't think not having the surgery is an option (and well, it appears that it will get worse and I will go blind if not - so definitely NOT an option). Here are my options/brands:

Acrysoft monofocal Acrysoft Vivity Acrysoft PanOptix

I am working full-time and drive, use devices and read all the time. What concerns me is making the wrong choice! My surgeon warned that I won't be able to read my mobile phone or up close without glasses, EVER, if I choose the monofocal. With regard to the Panoptix, I've read that people have had all sorts of issues - including halos, brain not processing new sight correctly, not seeing correctly for MONTHS,. I don't have that kind of time to wait 😦 I REALLY need to see in my job. So, I am a bit lost and would welcome any advice. I will pay whatever...just need to make the right decision. My surgeon is great as he is not trying to persuade me..but now I am a bit overwhelmed with all of the information. Thank you in advance.

0 likes, 60 replies

60 Replies

Prev Next
  • Edited

    One thing that can be very, very helpful is to become familiar with defocus curves. People get VERY different results, even with the same lens. A defocus curve is made when a group of people with the same lenses are tested for visual acuity. It shows you what the average visual acuity for that group of people is at different diopters, which can be converted to distance. Be very, very careful about thinking your results will be exactly the same as what another person has experienced. For example, I have monofocal lenses set up for monovision. My far eye is at -0.5D, and my near eye is at -1.75D. There is NO WAY I could use a cell phone just using my far eye. I can just sort of make out text when the phone is held at arm's length--and that's with guessing at a lot of the characters. No way could I hold the phone and dial/text at the same time. Looking at where things are in focus, if my far eye result for the lens was the same as Ron's, I'd need the phone held more than 50" away to be able to use it.The same goes for reading distance. If I finagle together some glasses to get my eye to about -1.25D, if I hold a letter from the bank at full arm's length it's in comfortable focus for reading. Coming in as little as an inch or 2 and it starts getting blurry.

    .

    One thing to really consider is where do you spend most of your "vision" time, and what activities are most important to you. For me, I absolutely hate taking on/off glasses all the time to see something. If I'm going to settle down for a while, like for driving or reading a book, the glasses don't bother me. Plus I'm always driving in the car, or reading in a particular spot in the house, so my glasses can just live in a particular location. So I gave up a little distance vision in order to not have to always be looking for a pair of glasses, and having always been a little nearsighted, I'm used to this. Other people really want the best distance, and don't mind having readers lying all over the place (they hide from me in my house.) There are no perfect lenses; there will be some issue with every choice and you need to really thing about what's important to you. Then it's a matter of deciding what compromise you can best live with.

    • Posted

      Hi Lucy,

      Thank you so much for this information. You make some really great points. At the moment, I cannot do anything without glasses - except if I put something right in front of my face - then I can read without glasses. Otherwise, I have progressive glasses (which is what I imagine tri-focals to be - but apparently they can cause huge issues!), or I wear daily wear multi-focal contacts (but I still have to wear low power readers with these as these types of contacts don't have lots of options to correct for up close). So, in summary, i have to wear glasses all the time no matter what I do, which I have gotten used to. It seems really nice that once I get this surgery, there will be some component where I won't need glasses (yay!) - but, as you say, which one? It really scares me about the night driving with some of the options. I am, unfortunately, getting a taste of scary night time driving right now (and have stopped as a result) with my cataracts - and I don't want this in the future. This is moving my decision to either mini-mono (if I can handle this) or maybe the Vivity as it seems to not have the extreme reactions (I think as I am still reading up).

      Thank you again 😃

    • Posted

      I didn't consider that you may be wearing MF contacts. If you want to try simulating the close eye in monovision I would use plain monofocal contacts for the test. For your -4.0 D right eye, to simulate -1.25 monovision, you would use a -2.75 D contact. You are not going to get a real good idea of the distance part of monovision because of the cataract in the left eye, but that should give you a reasonable idea of what you would get for reading ability out of the right eye.

  • Edited

    Jennifer,

    Wishing you luck. I am a 70-year old male had both eyes done this fall with Vivity. My second eye was done recently, Nov 4. I was far-sighted. I would rate my experience and results, not perfect, but very, very good.

    Driving is a tad more difficult at night as it seems darker, but doable. We just got a car with brighter headlights, so that helps. I sensed a was a bit of glare and a peripheral flicker, but that lasted only a few days. No halos, no more glare from oncoming headlights than with my natural lenses.

    I am typing on my Macbook now without glasses. I am fine on the computer. I can read the car dash without glasses. To read text on a paper page I have been wearing the least powerful readers, 1.25. I do sense a bit of eye fatigue using the readers. I may have a bit of residual astigmatism. I was told to wait a bit before testing to see if prescription readers might help.

    Someone in the thread noted some clinics offer only do Alcon or Johnson and Johnson. The doctors I go to only do Alcon. I also liked the idea of the J and J Eyhance. The Eyhance would have meant glasses for intermediate as well, but would have been largely covered by my insurance. My out-of-pocket for 2 eyes in Pennsylvania was near $5000. I've seen here that others have paid more for these same lenses.

    If your cataracts are not now noticeably and negatively affecting your vision, well, you might feel disappointed in the change after lens implantation. I felt that way a bit. It is hard to really remember what one's former vision was like. But when I visited my trusted optometrist, she told me my vision was, in fact, far better than before. The surgeon did not go for any sort of mono-vision correction. Both eyes are set to plano, so distance and intemediate are fine Things get fuzzy closer than 24 inches. The doc told me my intermediate vision is now 20/25 without glasses, which of course, is imperfect, but improved.

    Again, wishing you success. I hope you end up as happy as I am with my new lenses.

    • Edited

      @kevin1951 - thank you so much for sharing your experience. It is nice to read a good experience. It's all a bit scary if I am completely honest. Reading from the nice people here is helping so much :0)

  • Edited

    Hi Jennifer - not a fun diagnosis is it. I was 5 years older than you when I got the terrible news. my cataracts were bad and progressed rapidly - may have been years of steriod creams for atopic ezcema that was cause.

    I am not going to talk up any one type of IOL. There are pros and cons to each. No perfect lens. I will say do your research on surgeons as that plays a significant role in outcome and the more the target is achieved better the outcome.

    For myself I chose an EDOF lens Symfony. Like you I spend my work day on iPhone and laptop - working with spreadsheets so I really did not want progressives or to whip on and off glasses. i had both surgeries summer of 2017. Have not had pco in either eye and rarely wear glasses. I do have readers +1.25 to read fine print - like stock wuotes in paper, pill bottles - labels on soup cans etc and occasionally when I read novels extended period of time.

    Compromise is night vision - although to be honest I do drive at night with little thought to the halos. The glare is minimal - far less than when I was driving with cataracts. This is where minimal refraction error is important from my understanding. I do see huge concentric circles around certain lights ie red traffic lights that get smaller as I approach them. Outer rings are so faint at this point years after surgery I have to concentrate to see them. Inner rings are more vivid and they are still noticeable.

    I did develop epiretinal membrane in one eye in which straight lines appear curvy and vision is blurred. Both eyes open I do not notice this. surgery not recommended at this time (deemed risky and since my vision with both eyes open is good no need). Epiretinal membrane can be caused by cataract surgery itself and that is the most likely cause of mine.

    My thoughts - given my current situation if I had chose any sort of monovision my overall vision would be more compromised than it is and I would likely be wearing glasses to correct. I like to play golf and snorkel - it is wonderful not yo have to wear glasses everyday. Everyone is different - but I have no regrets for going with EFOF. If there was refraction errors and i had to wear glasses to correct as well as live with the night time issues my answer would be different.

    I think younger patients have a much more difficult time deciding. Older patients already experienced decline in vision so they gain something from cataract surgery. Whereas a younger patient has to make a compromise and give up something.

    Wishing you well on this journey.

    • Posted

      Hi @Sue_An2,

      No, not fun at all!! You know the Doctor asked me about steroids and I said that I have not taken them - but you know, maybe I was in shock because I totally forgot that I had blepharitis the previous year and took eye cream all year. I wonder if that could have brought early cataracts?

      I am sorry to read about the epiretinal membrane. God, more scary stuff FFS!

      Actually, I am glad you mentioned the activities you like to do. My favorite thing in the whole world is swimming and I love to snorkel too! I also like walking through European cities and looking a architecture - honestly life would not be worth living if I could not do either of these things well!

      I already wear progressive glasses, so my vision is not great! But, I think based on your experience and others I should also maybe strongly consider the Vivity! I have now completely ruled out the PanOptix.

      Thank you so much again for sharing your experience 😃**

    • Edited

      You're welcome. Again sorry you are having to deal with this. I wish I knew side effects of those steriod creams. They did not help much with eczema.

      Yes lots to think about. I found it helpful to do a spreadsheet pros and cons considering activities I like to do. The one plus is swimming snorkelling as I was never able to see (near sighted since age 12 due to high fever red measles. Being able to see coral reef with clear vision was stunning.

      Very important to find a good surgeon for the type of IOL you want. Hitting that refraction target is especially important when opting for premium IOLs. IOLs come in .50 diopters vs glasses which come in increments of .25Healing process too can bring another .25 either way (IOL is much thinner than your natural lens do will shift back and forth till it adheres (takes about 6 weeks) which is why it is best to wait between surgeries. Once first eye settles surgeon can make sn adjustment to target of 2nd eye.

      Good luck to you. Lots of good people here to support you. To my knowledge no expert here - some read up a lot on it. But best advice will come from a surgeon. Find one that will work with you.

  • Edited

    Given your criteria and the options available to you I think the choice is very clear… go with Vivity. If you drive a lot at night I wouldn't risk the Panoptix. And yes you may not even be able to check a notification on you Phone with a Monofocal without progressives or readers let alone actual reading. Vivity should give you "good enough" near vision for quick glances like checking your phone but you'd still likely need low add readers of plano progressives for actual reading (like reading a book)

    • Posted

      Hi @david98963,

      Thanks for the suggestion. Yes, I am starting to closely consider these 😃 I definitely have ruled out the PanOptix.

  • Edited

    I recently went through all the choices for IOL's... it can become overwhelming! I, too, was new to these forums and didn't understand some of what people were talking about because they use acronyms, but I learned most of them.

    I have an astigmatism and wear tri-focals, I have four sets of glasses for varying tasks (reading, driving, watching TV in bed and a set of tri-focals for everything) it can get expensive each time my vision changes! I found out I have a cataract and it grew quickly in 6 months. Since I have the astigmatism, it was suggested I get a Toric lens if I go for a multi-focal lens. My doctor gave me the choice of Eyhance (I would still need glasses) or the PanOptix and he said I might need glasses for very fine print. I had read about the haloes and other issues some people have had with the PanOptix. To be honest, all the choices seem have some trade-offs, whether it is that you will still need reading glasses, halo effects, etc. I read many different sources about the PanOptix and felt comfortable having it put in.

    My surgery was yesterday, (11/18/21) in the morning. Today I went for my follow-up and I'm seeing 20/20 in that eye! Where I used to need my computer/reading glasses to type this on my computer, I am not wearing my glasses at all, even for my other eye, which the doctor said might happen. I am very happy with the lens and it is nice to know I don't need glasses. I know I need to wait 6-8 weeks for my eyes to fully adjust to the change. Since I haven't been outside at night, I went out on my 2nd story balcony and looked directly at a spotlight on the ground. I looked at it with my non-operated eye and saw a hazy area around it. Then looked at it with the new lens and I saw radiated light from it, but it was more like a radiant star and the lines were straight instead of hazy. It didn't seem abnormal, just a different look. I doubt I will have problems driving, as there has always been some sort of haze around headlights, street lights and traffic signals for me.

    Everyone has to figure out what is best for their situation and budget. Maybe you have different options if you don't have an astigmatism. I know the PanOptix is expensive, but I figure after I have the 2nd eye done next year, I'll save a lot of money not having to buy new lenses all the time (I rarely would change my frames and it saved me lots of money).

    On another note, I was very apprehensive about the cataract surgery, as I have never had eye surgery and it is one of the things I have always feared. I talked to many people and they kept telling me it is so easy. I think I read too much about the surgery and the post-operative issues and that made my fears worsen. I didn't see any instruments and only saw a light during the procedure. No pain at all, not even any pressure. Also. my doctor doesn't offer the laser-assisted procedure. Some doctors do... it costs more and it depends on the doctor's cutting abilities. The doctor still needs to manually suction out the bits of the cataract the laser breaks up, and insert the lens manually. So the laser basically only measures and cuts, then breaks up the cataract.

    Lastly, my post-op was a little scary. Last night I had a large black floater I was seeing and today I found out it was the medicine he puts in the eye so I don't have to add the expensive post-op eye drops. Also, when I looked at bright lights, like my vanity lights, I saw flashes of light. This morning I called the office when I saw them and they checked my eyes and found the retina was not detached. This is actually a normal side-effect to the surgery (PVD) and will subside as the eye heals from the surgery. I also go to a retinologist and he always told me that if I ever saw flashes of light to call him immediately because it could mean the retina is trying to detach. My cataract surgeon explained that the eye has had a lot done to it to take out the cataract and install the lens, so this is the adjustment the eye goes through. My retinologist also explained to me that the vitreous fluid changes as we get older and can cause some of the changes we see in our eyes. I've learned quite a bit over the past few years about my aging eyes... and I'm only 66!

    I wish you luck in your decision and surgery. Take it from someone who was so apprehensive... it really is an easy procedure. It is also the most common surgical procedure.

    • Posted

      After about 10 months of perfect vision I had the PVD thing occur. It seems to be age related, and not from the surgery. From what I have learned when the vitreous detaches it can cause flashes of light. If the retina detaches that causes flashes of light too, and that of course is much more serious. I have also learned that these flashes of light occur with your eyes closed, or in a pitch dark room, because it is not real light coming into the eye. Your eye just interprets it as light.

    • Posted

      Thank you so much Beth 😃 I have just come from a second opinion appointment with a surgeon who also does the laser surgery (honestly, I did not even know that laser on top was an option!). I left feeling more overwhelmed than comforted. He did not even discuss the mono or any other option and has recommended the Symphony in one eye and the Synergy in the other. I was a bit put off that all options were not discussed with me as the cost for both of these was quoted at about $9k with the laser. I think I am have to just trust that these people know what they are doing and just go with what they suggest. I have to see a retinologist to be signed off for surgery beforehand and that is the next step. I actually see flashes of light now out of the side of my worst eye - so wondering if I should be worried!

    • Posted

      They explained (and not very well I might add) to counter act some of the issues such as halos, etc. At least, that is what I understood!

    • Edited

      I just got the Synergy last week. You can see my post on my experience. I am guessing they recommend Synergy for 1 eye and Symphony for the other one as Synergy's close vision add will probably also produce larger halos.

      Synergy "Can" provide the best distance to close vision of any IOL out there, but IMHO that also comes with risk, making it the risky of the IOLs, so my advice is only implant this IOL if you have no other conditions and not just the big ones like Mascular degeneration, but if you have extreme myopia, hyperopia or floaters I would be wary.

      Also Synergy is very susceptible to refractive miss. So I would get at least 2 Master IOL Axial Length measurement on different days and from different machines and make sure they are consistent.

      And if you have astigmatism make sure it if regular and correct for that.

    • Edited

      If it was me, I would be hearing alarm bells going off. Symphony in one eye and Synergy in the other is not in my opinion an obvious way to go. Not offering a monovision option is also concerning. From the research I have done, I have not found any conclusive evidence that using a laser for the surgery actually improves outcomes. It does drive up the cost though!

      .

      If cost is any kind of issue, and/or night vision is a priority, I would get a quote on some alternative options:

      1. Mini-monovision - Full distance correction in the dominant eye (-0.25 D target), and slight myopia in the non dominant eye (-1.25 D to -1.50 D target). Both eyes with a monofocal lens like the AcrySof IQ or Tecnis 1.
      2. Hybrid monovision - Full distance correction in the dominant eye (-0.25 D target) with a monofocal lens, and a Vivity (-0.75 target), or Eyhance (-1.0 D target), in the non dominant eye.

        .

        Just my thoughts...

    • Posted

      I agree the femtolaser is a waste of money

    • Posted

      Beth-R - how old are you?

    • Edited

      I should clarify that femto is a waste of money for making a Capsulorhexis. A manually created Capsulorhexis is fine or may be even better. However the femto can be useful for correcting astigmatism or helping to align a toric IOL.

    • Edited

      The distinction you make re. astigmatism here is vitally important. I have low diopter (0.25-0.5) astigmatism for which no toric lenses are available, and so it goes uncorrected, but that's bad enough to make reading vision blurry. If Femto laser devices can effectively correct/reduce low levels of astigmatism by good placement of incisions, that can be a great boon. I think I'll opt for it, if Surgeon assures me that this correction can be achieved in my case. Thanks for the comment, as it helps me with the decision on the Femto option.

      Another thought is that having a perfectly circular & centered Rhexis that laser can give you should make the implant more stable, and explantation safer should that need arise in the future.

    • Posted

      Jennifer,

      Most importantly, you need to have confidence in your ophthalmologist performing the surgery.

      I am 2 weeks out from surgery and doing well. The flashes are less and less each day, the doctor said it can take weeks or months. I assume you are going to a retinologist due to the flashes. As we age, the vitreous fluid changes and this is why I began going to a retinologist, but my issue wasn't flashes.

      I know you are concerned about the night driving with the PanOptix, so I will let you know what I have been seeing at night. My right eye (new lens) sees some rings around round lights such as traffic signals and headlight. It also sees the starburst, which makes the headlights seem brighter and not as clear. The surgeon said in most people, this either becomes less bothersome or goes away after about 3-6 months, depending on the person. I look at those same lights with my other eye (slight cataract) and they are more clear but I still see a hazy area around them. I think my brain just needs to adjust while my eye is also adjusting. The brighter lights don't bother me much, it's just different. For driving, you might want to ask your surgeon if there are any good night vision glasses or special coatings that will help after surgery to cut down on the brightness on your long drives. Express your concerns with him/her and they might be able to offer other options. Don't be afraid to tell them you don't understand what they are telling you, they will find a way to explain it better.

      Overall, I am quite pleased with my vision and only need readers for close vision, such as reading a book, etc. I can go with nothing for short spurts, but there is a definite difference in the vision (20/20 and sometimes 20/15)... perfect with the new lens and 20/25 in the other eye. If you want to eliminate the need for glasses for different tasks, I'd choose the PanOptix. I'm not familiar with using different lenses in each eye.

      I have scheduled to have my other cataract removed in early February and I will replace it with the PanOptix lens, too.

      As far as laser vs manual surgery, I would suggest reading up on the differences. I read one article about a doctor who had an interest in a company that sells the laser equipment and had used it for a few years, then went back to manual surgery. And it was mentioned in one article that some doctors use the laser surgery because they are not confident in their cutting skills. The equipment is about $500k and they usually charge around $1500 for the procedure. Add that to the cost of the lens and it gets expensive, especially if you have to pay for part of the surgery, too. I asked my surgeon about it and he said he doesn't offer it because he doesn't need it. He's done over 15,000 cataract surgeries and is the best in our area. Most of the friends I know who had successful cataract surgery had the manual method (only one friend had laser). As I said in the beginning, it depends on the confidence you have in your surgeon.

      I hope this additional info helps with your decision.

    • Edited

      My surgeon measured my eyes and said by one method I had 0 astigmatism, and by the second method I had 0.4 D. He said he his experience is that the actual is typically right between the two methods. One year after surgery my eyeglass prescription for the eye is 0.0 D Sphere, and 0.75 D Cylinder. I was initially a bit disappointed in the residual astigmatism, but I get 20/20 and half of the 20/15 line on an eye test, while having reasonably good vision down to about 18-20". I did some research on the use of LRI to correct small amounts of astigmatism, and concluded it was a reasonable way to go. However, one surgeon said that not all patients thanked him for the procedure as they felt they had reduced close vision after the astigmatism was reduced. Between that and my very good distance vision, I abandoned the thought of getting LRI.

      .

      My surgeon uses a manual incision, so perhaps that is an indication that a laser may improve outcomes. But, I am only a case of one, and it would be hard to generalize from that. And, the objective of getting zero astigmatism may be somewhat elusive, and not always optimum in any case. He has told me that when it comes time to do the second eye, that I have more astigmatism but it is irregular so he cannot recommend a toric lens. My expectation is that I will also have residual astigmatism with that eye too. But is will be a close eye, and I suspect less critical. At -1.25 to -1.50 D, distance vision is not going to be crisp, and I suspect I would not notice any astigmatism.

    • Edited

      Right after I get a toric IOL and the Dr. used the mark the eye method, I see this article and video in Healio talking about newer better ways to deal with Astigmatism and how he shoots for Zero astigmatism. Anything has got to be better than taking a marker to your eye.

      Dr. Donnenfeld talked about using the Callisto Eye System for Astigmatism. But I don't think there is any doctor around me that uses this type of equipment.

      "VIDEO: Technologies available to automate astigmatism management"

    • Posted

      Yes, using a marker on the eye does seem a little crude. My wife reported that she had an extra stop on the "assembly line" to getting her toric installed. That was to mark the angular position on the eye.

      .

      I would check the article out, but I seem to have an issue with the Healio site keeping track of how many times I have used it, and then they cut me off.

    • Edited

      Thanks for the comment

      Right. When I made my initial comment I was purely thinking about the Capsulorhexis but then I remembered that the Femto can be helpful for other things as well. If it's just for the Capsulorhexis I do think it's an unnecessary expense but if they're using it for other things at the same time like incisions to correct astigmatism it could be a good option. And as long as you're under the Femto of course it makes sense to use it for the Capsulorhexis too.

    • Posted

      Just use the so-called "Incognito" mode in your browser so they won't be able to track you down any more.

    • Posted

      Thanks. I wondered if that would work, but had not tried it.

    • Posted

      Hi @Beth-R,

      Thanks again for sharing your experience. It really sounds like it the lenses work, they can be great - and if they don't work, it can be a nightmare as other posters have shared.

      For some reason, and I suppose I am so emotionally (fear) involved, I am just not understanding these people when they explain things to me. I think partially b/c their motivations are to sell and I am picking up on that (I am a marketing professor) and so I am questioning everything in my mind with regard to what I need, what their motive is, what the risks are, and what is actually the best option. I've seen two surgeons so far and both have their strengths and weaknesses. Surgeon 1 diagnosed the cataracts and is probably the most personable Doctor I have ever encountered. He spent a LOT of time with me discussing everything and I just really liked him. He sent me home with a brochure and price list for the three types of lenses he had on offer and booked an appointment for me to come back and measure my eyes and discuss which option would be best for me. Although I very much liked him, there were a couple of things that caused me a slight concern (he was the only person in his practice as he started his own practice in the middle of the pandemic as he explained to me and he wasn't wearing a mask in our consultation - which, I find a bit odd in a pandemic in relation to a medical professional). I then found another surgeon who is VERY accomplished in research, publications, book chapters, lectures at universities (and at a medical school locally) and has a stellar reputation. He is the one who told me that he would choose what is best for me and recommended the most expensive lenses. The problem is, I did not like him. He seemed annoyed at my questions and had a large degree of hubris/arrogance (as many surgeons do, but still, I did not like it). So, I have seen two people, who, for whatever reason, did not make me feel like I am okay for them to go poking around in my eyeballs! Problem is, to go and see another person means another day of having eyes dilated and losing another work day (difficult during the semester). I am starting to feel exasperated! I acknowledge how lucky I am to just have these options - but I have them and must do what is best given my options. Some people say that I have to accept that I don't have to like the person, just that they are good! I know that makes sense - but it's also easy to say until you are the one having the surgery!

      Sigh, I will probably go and see at least one more person. I am now asking people I know for recommendations (difficult as my network is not yet in the target age group for cataract surgery) and will go see someone via traditional word-of-mouth rather than Google reviews (which as we all know can be fake).

      Thanks again for sharing 😃

    • Edited

      "I have low diopter (0.25-0.5) astigmatism for which no toric lenses are available"

      .

      Is the astigmatism you refer to what you have in eyeglasses, or is it the astigmatism measured by the surgeon for an IOL? They can be different as the eyeglass astigmatism is the sum of cornea astigmatism and that in the natural lens. When the natural lens is removed in cataract surgery they only have to correct for the astigmatism in the cornea. It can be more, or less than the eyeglass astigmatism.

      .

      My wife had cataract surgery on Friday and I learned something new. The surgeon used a lens which only has 1.0 D cylinder. I did not know they were available, and thought 1.5 D cylinder was the minimum for a toric. The lens is a SN6AT2 AcrySof IQ Toric. Tecnis and others don't seem to have powers that go that low. But, if your true correction required is only 0.5 D, then even this one is too much.

    • Edited

      I did a review of this thread, and I think I have already given you as much technical information as I can contribute. As I understand it you would like to drive at night, and if possible would also like to be mainly eyeglasses free, but are OK with progressives, as that is what you use now. Based on that, your safest choice would be basic monofocals like the AcrySof IQ Aspheric (or Clareon if available). If done in both eyes then progressives (or reading glasses) would be mandatory for reading, although you could likely could drive just fine without progressives.

      .

      And then venturing into the being eyeglasses free, the next lowest risk option in my opinion would be the mini-monovision with a AcrySof IQ or Clareon in your dominant eye set for distance, and the Vivity in the non dominant eye. A second monofocal is also an option, but would have to be under corrected by about -1.25 D instead of -0.75 for the Vivity.

      .

      In my opinion with your night driving requirement, the Synergy and Symphony combination would be the highest risk. You may not find it acceptable at all to drive at night, and eyeglasses will not be able to fix it. With a monovision solution any under correction to achieve monovision can be perfectly corrected with eyeglasses for demanding vision situations.

      .

      Given your two choices (so far) my thoughts would be to go back to Surgeon 1 and find out if the surgeon is OK with a two step plan, and mini monovision with the Vivity or a second monofocal. Assuming the distance dominant eye is done first with a monfocal, then there is no rush to get the second eye done, and you will have time to evaluate whether to go with a second monofocal or the Vivity for the non-dominant eye.

      .

      Since you are a marketing professional, you obviously will be very familiar with the old "you get what you pay for" line. I think with cataract surgery and IOLs that is not always true. When you pay more you get something different, but whether it is better or not is very much in the eye of the beholder! Multi focal IOLs like the Synergy and PanOptix offer a lot more depth of focus, but there are compromises in optical quality associated with them, that some are OK with, and others not so much.

    • Posted

      HI @RonAKA

      Thanks so much for the recommendations. I have a feeling that I should go back to surgeon 1 for a discussion as we did not ever get to the more in-depth stage of discussions. I do pay attention to cues, however, and if he doesn't wear a mask in a pandemic when visiting with patients, what else does he not do? I will probably go see a 3rd one based on in-person word-of-mouth and see what they say 😃

    • Edited

      Not wearing a mask does seem a bit odd. The other bit of a red flag was that you mentioned he just started his practice during the pandemic. I suspect practice makes perfect in cataract surgery, and ideally you want someone who has done lots of surgeries with the type of lens that you are getting.

      .

      That said, surgeon 1 seems to be the more reasonable on in approach. Surgeon 2 sure sounds like he is doing everything possible to crank up the cost, and is only giving you one choice. That does not sound very professional.

    • Posted

      I totally agree @RonAKA, He did work at another practice for several years, but just started on his own during the pandemic. I think he's a good guy..I am just overly critical probably.

    • Posted

      Soks, I am 66 yrs old.

    • Edited

      Jennifer,

      I am now 25 days post-surgery and wanted to give you an update on the night driving. First off, I must tell you that I see everything clearer and brighter, especially bright light, such as reflective sunlight, headlights, etc.

      While driving at night, I find I can tolerate the headlights if I don't look at them and divert my eyes, such as concentrating on the vehicles directly in front of me or off to the right a bit. I am getting the other eye done in early February and will get the PanOptix mainly because all I will need are sunglasses! I might need reading glasses if I am reading a book, paper, etc. I really love the freedom of not being tied to glasses for different tasks and I think the headlights at night are a trade-off for that.

      I am still experiencing slight PVD, but mostly when I am around bright lights such as in stores or in front of my vanity with the bright lights. It is subsiding, and I hope it will be gone completely in a couple weeks. I see the doc again in 3-1/2 weeks, I'll ask him about it if it hasn't gone away completely.

    • Posted

      Hi @Beth-R,

      Thanks for providing the update. It's great to read things are still going well/getting better 😃

    • Posted

      ron, so are you saying astigmatism is less critical for near vision? why exactly is that? thx

    • Posted

      This is an old thread before I had my second eye done. I skimmed a couple of my posts and my thinking has "evolved" a bit since then.

      .

      My current thinking is that astigmatism is a double edged sword. Yes, leaving some can increase the depth of focus some, but it has a price. The price is crispness of vision even at near distances. In my near eye I have 0.75 D of cylinder and while it may be complicated a bit by it being irregular astigmatism, I can still read quite near, but the letters have a drop shadow.

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.