I've been booked in for TURP but not sure about it.
Posted , 13 users are following.
Hello there,
I have been having problems urinating for some time now. This takes the form of slow flow (sometimes very slow but it varies), some discomfort at times (not pain exactly, or soreness) when urinating.
I don't need to get up in the night and have no problems with bladder control. On occasions I feel a need to go shortly after finishing urinating but not regularly. I am fairly sure I am emptying my bladder.
I was referred to a consultant who did an ultrasound (external) scan of the area and a digital rectal exam. He showed me the scan and said I have an enlarged prostate, probably benign and booked me in for a cystoscopy in preparation for a TURP. No other suggestion was made.
I had the cystoscopy which was very painful and he saw me in the recovery area for a few minutes but I don't remember much of the conversation.
After two months I had heard nothing and chased it at the hospital. Eventually they told me that the forms had not been signed and they dealt with it and sent them off.
The next letter I got was a date for the TURP procedure with no appointment to discuss it with the consultant before.
I have arranged a consultation with him but having read a lot on this forum am not very happy about proceeding.
It seems that my symptoms are not as bad as any of those I have seen on the forum and wonder if TURP is a bit "overkill" in my case.
I would be very grateful for any advice anyone can give me.
I am sorry about the length of this post.
Thank you very much,
Richard.
0 likes, 15 replies
griff1980 richardeblack
Posted
does not work you , surgery is always a second option .
check both of these out on line , read up about both procedures then go to your
urologist and talk to them which one is best for you. best of luck make sure you make up your own mind on surgery and what type of procedure to have !!!
richardeblack griff1980
Posted
Richard
griff1980 richardeblack
Posted
Urolift is a good choice to start with because you are still a canidate for surgery if it does not work .
If you have to go the surgical route I strongly encourage you to check out
holmium laser enucleation of the prostate ( HOLEP ) .
What about the natural way to prostate health ?
Taking saw palmetto , beta sitosterol , promengrante extract , pumpkin seeds
boswellia gum extract , stinging nettle root powder , lycopene , selenium
zinc picolinate plus copper , quercetin , green tea extract , swedish flower pollen
cranberry extract .
for the last two years i have been dealing with chronic bacterial prostatitis
finally after three urologist's i don't have severe pain anymore .
I was looking into holep surgery but there were no hospitals locally that preform
the procedure.
I would have to travel 250 miles and would be out of my health care network
provider , so i would have to pay 50 % of the cost which is $ 20,000 To $ 30,000
dollars in my area .
I wish you the best of luck griff
Supertractorman richardeblack
Posted
David
surfman012 richardeblack
Posted
lester90053 richardeblack
Posted
oldbuzzard richardeblack
Posted
richard256 richardeblack
Posted
It was interesting reading your posting. I also started with exactly the same symptoms as yourself about 4 years ago. I too wasn't having to get up during the night and had good bladder control. My GP sent me for a cystoscopy which although uncomfortable showed nothing except a medium enlarged prostate. After waiting 5 months for a urine flow test the specialist informed me that my flow was not particularly good. I have had no urine infections and was surprised to hear from the specialist that my flow would only get worse as i got older. (I was 59 at the time). He then went on to tell me that i had 2 choices, that i could have a TURP which he then informed me would cost the NHS around £5000, and would probably need re doing after a few years, or I could go on medication which would only cost the NHS around £5 per month.! ( but the medication would affect my sex life!) It was as if he was making me feel guitly if I went for the Turp due to the cost.
Cutting a long story short, i have been on Tamulosin and Finasteride since then and having no problems. My flow seems to have inproved slightly and and the only negative is that my sex life has taking a tumble.
If i was in your shoes I wouldnt have the turp as it does seem a bit of an overkill.
I feel that the Turp should be a last resort.
Here in the UK Urolift is only done in a few areas and is expensive (£3500) and as far as i know not available on the NHS.
Hope all goes well for you.
tom86211 richardeblack
Posted
At this stage in your journey a TURP is total "overkill" - it would be a last resort, not a first choice of treatment.
You should start with the least harmful treatment first, then move on if that doesn't work - this would be a daily, or every other day capsule of FloMax (Tamsulosin) or other similar medication. This should give you immediate relief, but some here hate the side effects. I tolerate it very well and have been taking it for a number of years.
If you don't like the FloMax next consider PAE, then next in line would be UroLift.
What you wnat is maximum symptom relief with minimum side effects.
Also, as the only person here who apparently is a prostate cancer survivor, your doctor can absolutely NOT guarantee you that your condition if 'benign" without a biopsy. Depends on your PSA and rate of change of PSA (velocity). The DRE (Digital Rectal Exam) no doubt turned up with no irregularities, a good sign.
It would be very beneficial to you if you consulted with at least another urologist before going under the knife.
If you are in your 60's this is a VERY common condition.
Tom
Carry-on_CMDR richardeblack
Posted
As one person noted, a medications combo such as Uroxatral and Avodart should be tried before surgery (unless conditions are really seriously wrong), but another avenue is the use of clean intermittent self-catheterization (CIC), with a frequency matching the need of your urine retention.
I decided - when pressed by my surgery-minded urologist to schedule a TURP - to instead go with CIC, and initially did it 3x day, and a year ago increased to 4x a day. My BPH is no longer causing me significant problems, and the CIC procedure, using a hydrophilic catheter, is actually easy after you have done it for a few days. There is a brief learning period, and some discomfort at first.
When traveling, whether locally or distance, I simply take catheters with me, and have no problem doing this discretely in any men's room using a stall for privacy.
There is another thread on this site covering self-catheterization, as well as one covering the PAE proceure, one of the newest and least invasive techniques. PAE is a procedure done by interventional radiologists rather than urologists (which is probably why so few urologists speak to their patients about the PAE procedure).
Please explore all other options before you consent to any TURP.
richardeblack
Posted
Thank you so much for your amazing responses. They have given me much to think about and have reassured me that I have done the right thing by cancelling my TURP.
I had a good chat with my urologist who agreed that I have done the right thing by reading up on it and wants to see me again in 4 months time to re evaluate the situation.
I will have a more thorough read of all your replies as there is a lot of information there and I am seeing my GP tomorrow to see if he thinks that a medical route might be a good start and also to make sure I am on a regular check up for cancer. Again, my urologist suggested that this would be a good idea.
I will report back again on Friday (I've got a meeting tomorrow evening unfortunately).
Thanks again for all your support and advise.
A brilliant supportive network spanning the globe.
Thanks,
Richard.
jimjames richardeblack
Posted
Jim
tim07875 richardeblack
Posted
I could not be happier with my results. I did an overnight stay with a catheder, they sent me home the following morning bagless. I was passing blood and some small clots for a few weeks afterward, no big deal. The only issue I had (and I was warned about it) was that you'll have some urgency issues for several weeks, and when you have to "go" there's no putting it off. In addition, because you're urinating past some raw muscle tissue from the surgery, at the very end of the urination, it gets pretty painful. The good news is it all goes away. My surgery was 10/13/15 and by the holidays I was peeing like a teen, no urgency issues, no pain at all and I could not be happier. I'm probably a poster-boy (I'm 62) for the TURP. I did ask a bunch of questions, the most important being "Doc, how many TURPS have you done"? He's been urologist for 28 years, so he told me in excess of 1000.
I ama firm believer that those of us that have had great luck after a TURP is a direct result of the surgeon and his skill set, pure and simple. I had a green laser surgery some 10 years before, waste of time in my case. In fact, the TURP surgeon had to spend an additional hour on me to "clean up" the scar tissue from the laser treatment.
Ask some hard questions about what to expect? I see guys on this blog who spend weeks with a catheder post surgery. I never wore a tube, I just went home. Just as a comparison, my surgeon told me that my prostate was one of the largest he'd seen in years, and when he does a TURP, the usual tissue removal was 10-15cc, mine was over 50cc.
Do all the homework on your doc that you can. How many TURPS has he done? What type of post surgical issues might you expect? What's the worst you can expect? What about a typical recovery time? etc.
Lastly. If you plan on having more children in the future, TURP is not for you. In my case, I had a vasectomy when I was in my early 40's, so no big deal. Know that after a TURP, ejaculation during sex is a thing of the past. The sensation is identical, but no fluid. Now, I see guys on this blog that have some difficulty with this issue, I get it. But in my case, the symptom relief I got from the TURP far outweighed anything else.
Not sure where you live, but if you're in the Phoenix, AZ area I can highly recommend my doc. The doc that did my laser was a younger guy that I'd been seeing for years, but I simply think he was not confident in the laser , as I learned later that he did very little when he did his procedure on me.
Hope i was of some help.
Best of Luck.
kenneth1955 tim07875
Posted
kenneth1955 richardeblack
Posted