Intravenous therapy for UTI
Posted , 5 users are following.
Hi I have a serious case of UTI after a long bout of BPH and having not opted for surgery, I had decided to do CIC. However, I now have a bad case of UTI and most of the antibiotic drugs are not working. My family doctor says that I may have to cure it by intravenous theraphy. I am seeing my urologist in a couple of weeks who will let me know what course of action to take. Did anyone here do the intravenous theraphy for UTI? I would like to know what is involved and how the procedure works?
1 like, 11 replies
kenneth1955 daniel1960
Posted
derek76 daniel1960
Posted
jimjames derek76
Posted
I was in Daniel's boat a couple of years back. I passed on surgery because of the side effects, some sexual and some irreversible such as retrograde ejaculation. Two years later I think my results from self catherization (CIC) compare favorably, or even better, than many here who have had surgery.
For example, on the International Prostate Sympton Score (PSS) I was at the wrong end of "severe" prior to starting CIC. Up all night going to the bathroom, going on the hour during the day, retention over 300cc, etc, etc. Now, my PSS is borderline "mild". Maybe get up once during the night, sometimes sleep all the way through. Post void residual now often under 50. And this is WITHOUT catherization, as CiC has rehabilitated my flaccid *stretched" bladder to the point where sometimes I don't need to catherize for weeks at a time. No regrets not having surgery, at least not what is currently being offered.
Jim
derek76 jimjames
Posted
I really would like to know the true percentage who get bad results. Forums attract the ones with problems.In the early days of PVP on the sci med prostate bph News Group very few had complaints.
jimjames derek76
Posted
derek76 jimjames
Posted
When my prostate regrew about five years after PVP I had a consultation with one of the two top UK Uros who introduced the procedure here. He was by then using the second generation machine and admitted that early procedures were done too quickly and they now realised that the procedure needed to be done with greater care.
I wonder how much care is being taken now when I read here of how many thousands of operations that some have carried out and one doing five a day. It all sounds like an American production line.
In no way can you compare even the improved versions of TURP with GL.
jimjames derek76
Posted
Jim
derek76 jimjames
Posted
The hospital where I had the PVP was one of the first in the UK doing it and they only picked the most suitible patients for it. I was the sixth for my surgeon and the thirty eighth for the team. Most of their early ones were done with the Laserscope (original makers later taken over) representative in attendance.
A lot of early American patients were so impressed that they bought shares in the company.
jimjames daniel1960
Posted
I answered at length here: https://patient.info/forums/discuss/self-catherization-an-alternative-to-turp-greenlight-holep--336874
But to summarize, something tells me you don't need IV antibiotics, but that you do need a good urologist ASAP. Not in a couple of weeks but within a few days.
Jim
anthony2858 daniel1960
Posted
I would demand to be seen within a day or 2 not 2 weeks! that is a ctitical situation!!
I had the urolift done 2 weeks ago and had to go on a 3 day road trip and my dr advised that I be on a Cathater to ensure urinating during the trip.
I can not speak good or bad with this procedure as of yet. but hear nothing but good!!
Good lucc Daniel, and hang in there, so many great technologies now available!
kenneth1955 anthony2858
Posted