Is it too early for an ablation?
Posted , 8 users are following.
Hey guys,
I am a 16-year-old male, and in the last year and a half, I have experience 3 short (3-4 minute) episodes of SVT. These are the only 3 episodes I've had in my life. After my 2nd episode, I saw a cardiologist. They told me to wear a heart monitor for 30 days, and luckily, I caught one of the episodes. My heart rate was 258BPM for 4 minutes. The doctor said that SVT in itself isn't too dangerous as long as it doesn't exceed 30 minutes (after that, it's time to head to the ER). He did, however, say that something on my EKG leads him to believe I may have WPW. He said my EKG doesn't show the classic "delta wave" that WPW does show, but he believes there is a subtle hint that I may have it. He says IF I have WPW, that can be life-threatening at my age. His proposal is to do an EP study, and if he finds WPW, he will do an ablation to take care of it. He said even if I don't have WPW, he can do an ablation to get rid of the SVT, and he said we might as well do that while he's in there since I'm already taking on most of the risk just by doing the EP study.
I watched many testimonials about ablations on YouTube, and most of those people said they lived with SVT for 3.. 4.. 5.. sometimes even 10 years before doing an ablation. Is there something to be said for a "pre-mature" ablation? Is it worth even doing the EP study after just 3 short SVT episodes? With that being said, all of the people also said it started as short episodes, then it lengthened to 30 minutes, and then even to 1+ hours. I really don't want to experience SVT for even 10 minutes, it's not fun
I'm really torn here and I'd appreciate any advice. My entire family takes a natural approach whenever possible, so if I can avoid a procedure, that would be great.
0 likes, 12 replies
linda90194 ChristianTaylor
Posted
I had SVT for 5 years before they were able to capture it and diagnose it. It's miserable when you have it. Mine have lasted from 5 minutes to 2 hours.if you can void it, don't drink any caffeine. I have heard of teenagers having ablations. I haven't had any more episodes of SVT since.
ChristianTaylor linda90194
Posted
Hey Linda,
Thanks for replying. Are you saying that you had an ablation? If so, how long has it been since it, and you said you haven't had any episodes?
Also, are you saying you think it would be worth it to just do it now, or should I wait it out?
I haven't had caffeine in probably 2-3 years. I quit it a while back because it would make me feel shaky and jittery, and I knew it couldn't be good for your heart.
linda90194 ChristianTaylor
Posted
I had my ablation last October. My episodes kept getting more often and made me very tired for 2-3 days afterwards. I stopped driving as I had episodes while driving and though I was going to pass out and kill myself or someone else. Once I had to pull over and called an ambulance to pick me up. My heart rate was 200. That was before my ablation, haven't had any episodes like that since.
linda90194 ChristianTaylor
Posted
I didn't wait because each episode got worse and lasted longer. It makes you feel so bad when having it and afterwards it makes you feel like you have run a marathon when you haven't . It just really tired me out bad after each episode.
linda90194
Posted
Dumodal ChristianTaylor
Posted
EP study its common procedure with really low risk, you have more risk in going outside and taking the bus.
ChristianTaylor Dumodal
Posted
Thank you! It's comforting to know this.
ciaran33745 ChristianTaylor
Posted
Hi. I'm a 57 year old male in Ireland. I had SVT for about 20 years until it was cured by an ablation 5 years ago (no episodes, no meds since). SVT rarely lessens with time and usually gets much worse. The meds to control it usually have varying degrees of unpleasant side effects. I only wish I had my ablation years earlier, before it took too much normal freedom from my life.
The procedure is no big deal. If your Cardio says you are suitable, then go for it.
Good luck, whatever you decide
ChristianTaylor ciaran33745
Posted
soobi ChristianTaylor
Posted
Hi, i had around 8 episodes of svt over 3 years, mine were particularly bad and never stopped on their own so i was always blue lighted to hospital to have the dreaded adenosine which is horrendous! Because of this i was offered an ablation straight away. I was in 2 minds as i had been given medication (verapamil) which did control it but was told my body would eventually get used to the tablets and svt would start again. So i went for the ablation, which cured the svt but during the procedure my heart went into AF and my heart had to be shocked twice to get it back into sinus. This was very traumatic, and as a result i now have very bad ectopic (skipped) beats and I'm now back on my original medication to help the ectopics! I'm still glad i had my ablation though and would do it again, even after things didnt quite go right. I wouldnt wish svt on anyone, i got very depressed and anxious with mine as you never know when its going to happen. So my advice is to go for it, as others have said it will probably only get worse.
Sorry for the long message but just wanted to tell you my story 😊 I wish you well.
gr8fulwoman ChristianTaylor
Posted
Like another poster I am also 57.
I had two ablations- one 11 years ago that was not a success, and my second one just five weeks ago. It is true that as we age,SVT gets worse and not better.
As long as you have a definite SVT diagnosis, I think it's not too premature if you want to do it now. It really all depends on how badly or often it is affecting your life, and how much psychological upset you have because of it.
chadcf ChristianTaylor
Posted
I had an ablation after 3 episodes, though episode 3 was after going off my beta blockers for a stress test. I debated whether it was a good idea to live with it or not given beta blockers pretty much kept it in check. My electrocardiologist was not reserved at all though, he didn't seem to really care how big a problem was, if you wanted an ablation he'd do an ablation... I ultimately decided to do it because I am relatively young (not quite as young as you but at 39 young enough to ideally not be on heart meds) and the promise of a drug free life was appealing. But more than that, the experience of being cardioverted was something I never wanted to have and from all accounts SVT only tends to get worse with age. I figured that since I'd probably need it sooner or later, there was no point in postponing it given that for SVT the ablation is quite safe.