Just been diagnosed with prostrate cancer
Posted , 19 users are following.
I am 50 yr old reasonably fit and healthy or at least I thought I was.
My blood test revealed PSA level @ 6.2 which later reduced to 5.8 on my second test , I was sent for a biopsy where the doc told me my prostrate felt enlarged but didn't feel abnormal , unfortunately my results later revealed I have localised prostrate cancer . When the doctor revealed the news yesterday I was in total shock but now realise I am one of the lucky ones as my cancer appears to be none aggressive type, only one of the twelve biopsy samples revealed a small volume of cancer with a Gleason score of 6 which apparently is low.
My worry now is to decide to what to do next regarding treatment.
Do I sit and watch and wait or would anyone out there with a similar story advise otherwise., I am thinking about Prostate Seed Brachytherapy treatment but don't know a lot about the risks after or what the success rate is. At present, besides going to the loo more often my life hasn't been too affected.
Can anyone advise what to do
I have a choice to watch and wait or have radiotherapy ,, my dilemma is what if it spreads . Advice would be greatly appreciated
Yours worried S,,
0 likes, 129 replies
aksns61 JoeLucky
Posted
JoeLucky aksns61
Posted
Thanks for the advice
Already booked appointment with our local cancer group here. First thing I am going to ask at my first appointment with the docs, is HIFU treatment available, as given the option, even at this early stage, I see no reason not to have HIFU treatment as it still leaves me options afterwards that other treatments don't such as Brachytherapy which would probably be my next choice.
I guess it's available in the US ? I think it's under clinical trial here but I think you have to be referred to receive the treatment .
ES28567 JoeLucky
Posted
JoeLucky ES28567
Posted
aksns61 JoeLucky
Posted
Tybeeman aksns61
Posted
ES28567 Tybeeman
Posted
Tybeeman,
Your comments are counter productive. In some cases of a cancer diagnosis, it is prudent to act right away and to be aggressive with treatment. However in many cases, such as this one, the cancer is considered slow growing and nonaggressive and therefore time is on his side.
There are too many stories of men who took the very action you suggest and now live with regret that they did not take more time to research and decide what was truly the best course of action for their specific situation.
There is not a "one size fits all" when it comes to prostate cancer treatments and your statement is irresponsible!
alfred5 ES28567
Posted
Yes. As I said earlier, my other half wishes he'd not had treatment yet.
Tybeeman ES28567
Posted
Tybeeman ES28567
Posted
aksns61 JoeLucky
Posted
mark_fastco Tybeeman
Posted
I like you feel the same way about leaving cancer in my body that's why I had my prostate removed 2 weeks ago. Everybody needs to make their own decision on what is important to them but they owe it to them self to get all the facts. Know every ramification of every treatment inside and out and why every pro and con. And also what it would mean and look like if the cancer actually spread. There is a lot of sadder stories that have been on this very forum of prostate cancer treated in the later stages. On the other hand the nerve sparing prostatectomy that I just had sure feels invasive to me. And the side effects are not fun and it is life-altering. But at least the cancer is gone. Everyone needs to make their own informed decision and they need to know that no matter what doctors radiologist s or other members of this forum say, there is no easy way out
Tybeeman mark_fastco
Posted
barney34567 Tybeeman
Posted
People in their right mind would leave a cancer in their body if the cancer is very slow growing with a good chance that it would not pose a hazard to their health in the medium term.
Not every cancer has to be removed when it's identified.
Just ask the many patients with Gleason 6 who were railroaded into radical surgery and have to live for the next few decades with the unhappy life altering consequences.
ES28567 Tybeeman
Posted
Tybeeman,
You blow my mind with your outlandish claims! First, robotic prostatectomy is considered less harsh than a open prostatectomy but there is still incisions made and medical devices are thrust inside the body. Just watch a few videos on the operation! It is INVASIVE and it is still a MAJOR surgical operation) There is blood, cutting and a harsh and very long recovery time with some of the side effects lasting up to 2 years. DO NOT sugarcoat any type of prostatectomy procedure! And in some cases the side effects may never go away! (Also, the penis is shortened and that effect never goes away and they won't even tell you unless you ask).
Your statement "why would anyone leave cancer in their body is also somewhat misleading. Only in active surveillance are you leaving cancer in the body. With the procedure I had, (and I'm not advocating it is for everyone) the cancer is killed and the dead cancer cells are flushed out of the body. So the cancer is gone. As long as I have a prostate, there is a chance I could get cancer again but that is true with ANY procedure including prostatectomy.
So, between your option and mine l, here are the general differences...
We both get rid of the cancer and:
I retain continents and you lose it
I retain all sexual function and you lose it up to 2 years and when and if you get it back, it is never the same or as good.
Your penis is shorter and possibly deformed in shape when you can finally get an erection.
My procedure is way easier on the body and truly noninvasive while prostatectomy requires a longer recovery time and is still so harsh that some, less healthy, people are disqualified because there is a chance they won't make it through the operation.
If your cancer returns, your options are limited. I still have EVERY OPTION AVAILABLE plus...HIFU is REPEATABLE!
So here is the difference between what you tell people and what I tell people who are diagnosed with prostate cancer.
You tell men to panic and just get the prostate taken out.
I tell men first, don't panic. In most cases of low grade non-aggressive cancers, time is on their side and to consider all their choices and decide what is right for them based on their goals and what is important to them.
So stop telling everyone to have a prostatectomy! This is not a one size fits all. And even if a prostatectomy was right for you...it's not the right decision for everyone.
Tybeeman ES28567
Posted
My consistence was back in 3 months and that was just having to use a small pad.
I am at a 6 months and wit the vacuum pump therapy my penis size is almost back too normal.
After one month my orgasms are much stronger that before. There is a study on what this happens to a lot of men. I am just happy as hell with it.
Erections will come back but I am getting use to just injecting my slef and having the hard on of when I was 18.
No Chemicals in your body.
Read the web site for the Global Robotics Institute 9500 robotic prostatectomy so far
ES28567 Tybeeman
Posted
Long-term recovery, READ YOUR OWN POST.
Inconsistence
You...3 mos.
Me....0 mos.
Penis size
You...Even with vacuum pump still not back to normal size so 6 mos. and still counting. That's long-term. (And unfortunately, there is no guarantee it will ever get back to normal size but I hope for you and anyone else it does).
Me...just as long (or short...lol) as before HIFU.
Orgasms
You...Very glad you can have them but they are DRY. If you read what most (not all) men post, they don't like them. And this side effect is FOREVER! That's "long-term" in my book.
Me...all functions are retained.
Erections
6 mos. out (and still counting) and no natural erections. We can chalk that one up to "long-term". BTW, I'm very glad to hear you are doing injections, that is very helpful in your recovery (no sarcasm meant hear).
Me...had a natural erection the morning after HIFU. (It was rather uncomfortable as I had a catheter so even though I was happy everything was working, at that moment I actually wanted it to go away. FYI, it was not an anomaly, I continue to have erections. No pills no needles.
No Chemicals in your body.
You...Well, you are putting chemicals in your body when you give yourself injections for an assisted erection. But, I understand that you are talking strictly about other therapy treatments.
Me...no chemicals in my body.
HIFU is ultrasound. Same technology used to look at a fetus in a mothers womb.
Do I think HIFU is superior to prostatectomy (or any other procedure)? YES...that's why I chose it. It was right for me.
Do I think a prostatectomy was right for you? YES...because you did your research and it is what you felt was best for you.
But don't tell men to have a prostatectomy. Tell them your great experience. Be honest with them and let them know both your success and struggles so they know what to expect should they go down the path you choose.
But your last statement should be to...
Tell them that they are their own best advocate and to research all the available options and decide for themselves what is the best course of action for their body and their life. Because ultimately...they must live with the choice they make.
Roger2Dodger barney34567
Posted
MK51151 ES28567
Posted
Great comparison side by side.
I just want to ask everyone: Aren't we all here with same problems and looking a for other people honest experience?
I would like to use HIFU for my treatment but it was not recommended neither by urologist nor RO. Both of them agreed that I need either surgery or radiation for my Gleason 7b. Other problem is that HIFU is not covered under my plan and to pay out of pocket I can not aford it.Every honest experience gives us here more knowledge so we all can make what is best for everyone, or more times what is affordable.
want to thank all for first hand experience.
in just few days I will be making final choice for my treatment.
Tybeeman ES28567
Posted
aksns61 Tybeeman
Posted
Not true at all. Testosterone is available as part of recovery regardless of cancer treatment.
According to the NCCN guidelines for PC therapies, men are to be assisted to sexual functionality regardless of type of treatment. Radiation, hormone therapy, or surgery. Testosterone replacement can be a part of the recovery plan but it's not always recommended: each person's therapy and recovery should be guided by health professionals who track these things. That's why it's important to get firsthand information from guys in your cancer center that have had a wide range of procedures done. They talk openly about issue such as sexual function.
ES28567 MK51151
Posted
Sorry to hear that MK.
FYI, My urologist had told me I was not a candidate for FLA or HIFU but that is because he does not perform those procedures. So don't take the word of a urologist who doesn't perform the procedure. You would need to send your medical records to a specialist who does the procedure to find out.
But it sounds like it would be a waste of you time if finances are an obstacle. I have heard some men have used money from their IRA to pay for the procedure. I myself borrowed a portion of the funds.
Right now most insurance companies are not covering the procedure but some are starting to cover a portion of the costs.
Best of luck to you.
mark_fastco Tybeeman
Posted
Tybeeman mark_fastco
Posted
mark_fastco Tybeeman
Posted
Thank you that sounds promising. As you probably know it's kind of depressing for me at the moment
david90735 mark_fastco
Posted
http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/all-prostate-cancer-treatments-about-equally-effective-study-finds-n648471?cid=public-rss_20160915
This just came out today.
Tybeeman mark_fastco
Posted
barney34567 david90735
Posted
As many argued in here, with a low or medium grade carcinoma many options are available, including monitoring.
However if a biopsy indicates an aggressive cancer then the choices are more limited.
A potential problem for some men is that if a biopsy reveals a Gleason 3+3 or 3+4 when in fact a post op pathology could reveal a more aggressive cancer. And treating an aggressive cancer with non aggressive means is unwise.
Tybeeman barney34567
Posted
Roger2Dodger david90735
Posted
David. Great read. Thx for sharing. Your Gleason score is not necessarily the indicator for treatment or active watching in some cases. Your pathology remains can be further tested, as I have indicated in other posts. A man's age is taken in consideration also.
mark_fastco Tybeeman
Posted
I haven't been on this form for a while but I am looking back on when I was active on it and I found this discussion. I had a prostatectomy six months ago and that puts you at a year and I was wondering how your sexual function is. Cialis does not work for me the only thing that works is the injections. How are you doing after a year?