just had cataract procedure

Posted , 10 users are following.

Cataracts typically form in ones forties but are not usually significant. Its not until ones sixties that they may begin to cause vision problems. But, with a history of eye complications, it was of no surprise that I began to form cataracts earlier than most. At the age of 56, with a large cataract in my right eye, I was advised to have it removed.

As I learned, when a cataract is removed, the lens of the eye is also removed and replaced with an IOL lens (Intra Ocular Lens). Sounds straightforward enough, even though the thought of doing so is anxiety provoking.

In the process of being seen, having my eyes scanned and ultrasounded for measurements, and after seeing numerous professionals (opthalmologists, optometrists and eye surgeons), I learnt that I had a long way towards understanding all that I needed to know to make an intelligent decision about my sight.

What I learnt was that because I am very near sighted and have astigmatism, that a toric lens was recommended for me (this cost almost 600.00 more than what OHIP pays for a standard IOL), but I was willing to pay to correct the astigmatism.

I also learnt that I am not a candidate for a multi focal IOL, meaning that I could not have an IOL that matches the script of the lenses in the frame of my glasses. 

I was therefore not going to be able to see both up close and far without glasses but had to make a decision to correct my vision so that I had either near vision clarity or distance clarity.

My surgeon told me that most people correct for distance. I learnt that although this is the default for most people, it may not be best for me. In fact, my opthalmologist who has been my eye doctor for over forty years and diagnosed my symptomless detached retina when I was 18, recommended against correcting for far because I have been near sighted all my life and not being able to see within close range would be very difficult to adjust to.

I began searching online for chat groups and reading posts from people going through this most frustrating and exhausting process.

I learnt that I was not alone in getting different advise and unclear direction from specialists.

I felt relieved to know that I was not the only one confused by trying to figure out how my vision would be affected if I corrected to a -1.5, -1 or -2 versus -6.5, to name just some of the many numbers that were thrown at me, along with cylinder numerals and axis numerals. It made my head spin. Every time I tried to make sense of it all, I became even more confused.

Specialists have very little time to answer questions to incredibly important questions. While the procedure may be very common and part of their everyday work responsibilites, the implications of me requesting what I wanted (yes, it was left up to me) were huge. My final decision could make the difference between me walking around dizzy versus continuing to enjoy my life with relatively good vision.

Furthermore, aside from having to decide on near versus far clarity, I was also told that I could consider mono vision or even micro mono vision. Meaning that I could correct my "dominant" eye for distance and my non dominant eye for up close. For some, apparently, this means being able to use each eye for different distances. But for others, might mean a life of regretting the decision after not being able to adjust.

After repeated visits to my optometrist, I was able to get two contact lenses - one to simulate close and the other for far vision so that I could get a sense of how things might "look" after the procedure. This was very helpful in determining that my opthalmologist was right - near was my preference.

I had the procedure four days ago. I knew I was in capable hands so the procedure itself was not as anxiety provoking as the outcome.

I chose not to be sedated, even though surgeons say that it is best. I knew that I could manage without it.

The procedure is quite miraculous and fascinating. It was not painful, just strange feeling.

After, I wore my prescription glasses over the operated eye and have continued to do so because removing the lens in the right side of my glasses frame males it really challenging to see (glasses make everything smaller and trying to adjust to two different sizes out of each lens is impossible).

when I remove my glasses and cover my left eye, I can see that I am improving daily. since there is a lot of internal swelling, best vision is not expected to be observed until about four weeks time.

And then it will be time to remove the small cataract out of the other eye and replace the lens there too. I am thinking that I will likely ask for the same script of lens (-1.5) in that eye too. 

Bottom line is that when it comes to your eyes, dont be afraid to be considered a "difficult" patient just because youre wanting answers to your questions. If the surgeon doesnt have the time or patience to explain everything, find someone who will. Your eyes are worth it....

4 likes, 39 replies

39 Replies

  • Posted

    Very good advice.  I too live in Canada.  And also paid for a premium lens.  So thankful the surgery is covered and just had the difference between a monofocal and Symfony Lens to pay.  I too develop cataracts both eyes very rapidly at 53 - surgeon thought my long use of steriod creams for eczema might have been the cause.

    If your 2nd eye vision isn’t affected by the cataract and you can find a manageable solution to function take your time.   Perhaps a contact lens versus glasses would do the trick?

  • Posted

    Am glad that you looked at all the options and made the decision which was best for you.

    Just couple of suggestions:

    1. Wait for at least 2-3 weeks to see the actual

    • Posted

      Sorry my computer got frozen and the above message got sent while I was still typing it.

      Any way to repeat, just couple of suggestions:

      1. Wait for at least 2-3 weeks to see the actual prescription which you achieve for the right eye.

      2. You may want to have the left eye set for either -0.5D less or more than the right eye (and not the same), depending on what you end up with the right eye and what you like better using a trial lens in the left eye. You will probably be better off to have good near vision in one eye and good intermediate vision in the other eye, and then use glasses for distance.

  • Posted

    Hi I had a totally different experience I didn't get numbers thrown at me.. I was a given the option of near or distance. I I was 50 when I first noticed I had a cataract in my right eye I now have one in my left also. I have been very near sighted my whole life with a astigmatism as well. I have had very gd results from distance and I think of the two options wearing reading glasses is my preferred choice as at least I won't need them all the time. I get my second eye done on Sunday morning so am looking forward to being able to see with both eyes together again... I've been living with one near and one far for 5 mths now and I really don't like it in fact I feel quite disabled with the difference. I guess it's not for everybody. This is really good information for people looking for cataract pre op advice ty for sharing.

  • Posted

    Well said, unfortunately I took this surgery granted and didn't do the careful research which I usually do when dealing with my health. I'm paying the price for that decision now, it has been 4 months since my first surgery and 3 months since my second surgery and today I applied for an application to the National Library's program for the blind and visually impaired because I can no longer read for any length of time. I have cloudy membranes or capsules which are not getting any better . My doctor now informs me that a third of the cataract surgery patients develop this issue, she seems to take it stride while I'm going blind. There is so much information about this surgery that I was unaware of that I feel like a rube, which has never been the case. My advice to anyone who reads this before they opt in for surgery is simply tread carefully, take it very seriously, it's not a simple 20 minute out- patient procedure without any consequences

    • Posted

      Salty I am going through the same Ordeal,I would not have had it don't Unless it was my last alternative,my eyes is worst since the surgery.People say it's a simple surgery and with great results.

      I wish I had better results like most patients are saying,but unfortunately I am on the 2% list that have major issues.

           

    • Posted

      Please excuse the brevity of my reply, but can you tell what it is that you are experiencing? For how long? And what your doctor says is your recourse? And did you have your surgery in the US? I'm trying to get a handle on the truthfulness of my doctor's response i.e. the 1/3rd of all cataract patients rnd up with cloudy membranes, it sounded rather high to me. You mentioned 2%?

    • Posted

      Hi Salty - yes I would say your doctor was right about PCO (cloudy capsule) occurring one third of the time.  Some say it is higher than that at 50%.  It does seem to occur more with round edge IOLs vs the square edge ones but square edge have more edge glare - so I suppose it is pick which you’d rather.
    • Posted

      Part of my annoyance with my self and my doctor is that I didn't even know there was a choice between lenses, nevermind the differences in results , no one mentioned square vs round, the doctor made the choice, my only choices were whether I was going to pay $1900 for a toric lense and/or pay for laser surgery rather than standard surgery, the choices all were about money nothing about manufacturer, size, or square or round. The information flowing my way was so limited I might as well as been choosing something very trivial. I think that's how they run it here in the US. I'm thinking the people who are well informed on this forum are from Europe and Canada, but I could be wrong.

    • Posted

      I am from Canada and I wouldn’t necessarily say we get more info.  The diagnosis in Jan 2017 of cataracts blindsided me.  All the optometrist did was refer me to a surgeon as she couldn’t correct my vision any better than 20/60 RE and 20/50 LE.   It was a 3 month wait and during that time I researched cataracts on the net as I had no clue what would be done about them.  My parents and no one I knew had the surgery.  My husband’s mother had the surgery years ago but I recall she couldn’t see well even after the surgery and spent weeks eyes downcast whole her eyes healed.   So came across this forum and wrote down questions I had and when it was time to have my consultation (I had 2 due to my indecisiveness about lens) I asked those questions.  In Canada our surgeons are paid same amount no matter which lens you choose so they aren’t motivated by $ unless you do clear lens exchange and go private vs hospital.   But I was with 15 or so other people in the waiting room that had not discussed any lens options etc with SAME SURGEON - one was shocked to learn that morning her natural lens was being removed.  So I am not sure unless you ask you get much info and it is a shame b cause vision affects many a thing and quality of life.  There was so much time in surgeon’s office waiting for that first appointment you’d think they’d hand you some info to read on cataract surgery and IOL selection.  

      Everyone but me that day got a monofocal lens.  24 hours at post op ( with these same people) they were amazed I Coulter’s not only distance chart but reading one too.

      Yes not sure with how prevalent this surgery is why people aren’t given a longer consult and handed a questionnaire about your hobbies preferences type of work.  Sure would help.

    • Posted

      Hi Salty0, After my cataract surgery 8 months ago, on some days my eye has a "film" or "cloudiness". I have a history of "dry eyes" and have been using Systane eye drops but recently switch to Santan SOFT SANTEAR to relieve the "grittiness". I also take vitamin supplements including Lutein+zinc, and eat foods best for eye-health. The "film" or "cloudiness" still comes and goes. I am following all the PVD and PCO discussions here, and keeping myself educated on the subjects.

      US still has the best medical treatments and facilities, that is if one can afford them. Been to a few clinics in California, everyone was so helpful and amicable.

      The shortfall of a universal healthcare system is mediocrity. All surgeons are paid the same amount irrespective of their skills+experience, and never mind about their overhead costs+expensive hi-Tech equipment.

      Dr Gimble of Calgary was bankrupted by the Federal government, if not for the timely intervention of the then Albertan government to pay the hefty fines imposed on his surgery. His first Out-of-Hospital operating rooms for eye surgery in Canada was the first to apply radically different new small incision cataract surgery, combined with the revolutionary intraocular lens implants. He is one of the pioneers in the procedures and developed innovations in the surgical techniques that have become world standards.  I rest my case. wink

    • Posted

      Can relate to mediocrity statement referring to canada’s Healthcare system. Ist is what is is!   But no one is without - trade-offs.
    • Posted

      I'm more concerned with Birth Tourism with absconding tourist leaving behind a medical bill of C$1.2 million for the taxpayers to absorb. Ours is supposed to be a Bring Cash province.

    • Posted

      Morning Salty,I had surgery in Canada,I think your doctors response to 1/3 having cloudiness in the eye is more accurate than most surgeons led on it to be.The 2% I mentioned is a percentage I read on her with regards to Cataracts surgery results where 98% percent have satisfactory results  and 2% have issues.

      From what I have read and seen on here I don't feel these results are very accurate.  

    • Posted

      The caveat to the doctor's truthfulness about the "cloudy membranes" or PCO issues I'm experiencing is that it came 4 months after my surgery and much complaining on my part about the issues I was experiencing. I kind of got the general impression that their attitude was to keep this information about the PCO effect to themselves in the hope that the issue would go away or I would go away. During this entire time getting these people to acknowledge I had a "real" problem and it wasn't all in my head seemed to be a the overall attitude, in simpler terms it was like pulling teeth nothing proactive on the part of these doctors, not before, during or after these surgeries. I'm livid.

    • Posted

      That’s a real shame.  Have to wonder whether the issue is PCO or not.  If one never had clear vision from the get go I would be investigating other reasons first.  Because if it isn’t PCO and you go ahead with a YAG and it doesn’t fix the cloudiness you cannot do a lens exchange.  It could be residual astigmatism or miscalculation in power that was the real reason and the surgeon may not want to admit to or have to correct the issue on their dime.

      If getting no where with surgeon might be worth going to get another opinion.

    • Posted

      It has been 4 months since her cataract surgery, is a lens exchange still possible?

      @Salty0, Has your eye doctor examined your eye and then ensured you that you do not have PCO? Getting a second opinion will put your mind at ease hopefully.

    • Posted

      Hi feeman62151, Before my cataract surgery I learned that cases of retina detachment are < 3%. Anyways I signed the pre-Op paper(s) just before being wheeled into the Day Operating Room, fully aware that I might come out blind LOL.

      You can find interesting stats and info from your local Health Authority website. For example,

      "HealthLinkBC" has a page on "Cataract Surgery" covering topics from "Surgery Overview" to "What to Expect After Surgery", etc.

      Under the "Risks" heading, it states that fewer than 10 out of 100 people have complications from cataract surgery that could threaten their sight or require further surgery. The rate of complications increases in people who have other eye diseases in addition to the cataract.

      "How Well It Works":  Cataract surgery is successful for 85 to 92 out of 100 adults.

      In one large study, 95 out of 100 adults were satisfied with the results of their surgery. The people who were not satisfied were older adults who had other eye problems along with cataracts.footnote

    • Posted

      I would not trust results from any study, unless the investigators talked with the patients directly and not just with the surgeons, who performed the  surgery. (most of them do not do that)

      By the way, one can have blurriness from more than 1 reason. One can have blurriness from another reason in addition to having it due to the PCO. Thus, one has to have confidence in the surgeon to sort it out before having the surgery.

      Also, unless a PCO is really a major reason for the blurriness, one can choose to leave it alone. I have chosen to live with my PCO in the left eye for the last 20 years because my vision with it is reasonably good and the expected improvement by the YAG laser to remove it is rather small.

    • Posted

      That's the heart and soul of my trepidation. My first surgery was on my dominant eye with the most significant astigmatism and cataract on March 7th, they implanted a Toric Lens ( Alcon) I now know and it was like someone wave a majic wand, my vision improved to the point I had no need for glasses for reading or distance even computer work improved . No problem with burning eyes , gritty stuff , zero issue I was anxious to get on with the second surgery. I was on cloud nine. After the second surgery it was a 180° turn around. within weeks I had burning blurry eyes. We thought perhaps it was a reaction to the steroid drops. Tbese drops were supposed to be well shaken and during mu first surgery and after I want remembering to shake this little bottle so the thinking was perhaps I was getting the more concentrated dose because I was still using that same bottle, which we agreed I should stop using it.. None the less both developed "dry eye syndrome" and then things got progressively worse to where I am now, apply for an application to the library for the blind and visually impaired because I can no longer read comfortably. It's like after reading for a bit when I look up everything is blurry and out of focus. I'm sailor, I can't read a chart nor can I read a chartplotter. I'm screwed.

    • Posted

      Because of my limited ability to use this medium please take a look at my recent response to Sue An. Thanks
    • Posted

      Please see my response to Sue An . And yes my doctor said this was "cloudy membranes" which translates to cloudy capsule, which I believe is what's being called PCO. Agin these terms seems to be interchangeable. She is also wondering outloud if I have developed scar tissue. I'm going in to see her again on Tuesday, I've called UCSF to see if I can get a second opinion or some kind of assistance with this mess but I'm told before I can do that I need a referral from this doctor said all my records. A catch 22 if there ever were one.

    • Posted

      Yes lens exchange can be done 6 months after (possibly later than that) as long as the capsule still in tact.
    • Posted

      I am surprised you were told to use same bottle of post op drops for both eyes.  I had plenty of drops after my first surgery but was given strict instructions to throw them out and get new prescriptions filled for 2nd eye ‘s surgery.  That is for any eye prescription I have ever had even for conjunctivitis.  If that tip touches your eye it is no longer sterile.

      Did you have a toric lens in 2nd eye too?  The blurriness could be due to lens rotating (common for toric lenses). A surgery can be done to rotate it back or lasik will do the trick too.

    • Posted

      I had 3 different prescription bottles for each surgery, one antibiotic, one called Prolens and another larger bottle that was defined as a steroid, although after the fact I was told that Prolens was also a steroid.. The antibiotics and Prolens ran out after the first surgery and was renewed but the larger bottle had about half the content keft and I was told it was ok to continue to use it. I did have a back up script for a replacement if I needed it. It was about 3 weeks after the second surgery that I developed the burning eyes and the doctor told me that it might be the steroids that were doing it and stopped using them with her agreement. Seemed stupid to me to continue using a medication that was causing that reaction but I was the one that had to bring that up. It was a little after that time that I brought up the fact about the not so well shaken bottle that might have been left concentrated. None of the bottle tips ever touched my either eye. I approached this very carefully that operation for both eyes was painful regardless of what they tell people, I felt all the manuevers, manipulation and was vocal about it during and after the surgery, and she knew.. i am by no means a complainer about pain been through major back surgery so I know what can be this operation was billed as almost painless, " you won't feel anything but pressure", really I beg to differ

    • Posted

      It surprises me how pre-op and post op instructions for this “common” procedure are from place to place - even with same country.  I was instructed to take both antibiotic and steriod drops days ahead of surgery and antibiotics continued for 1 week after but steriod drops for 5 weeks.  

      But individual experiences can vary.   I fortunately didn’t have any pain - just a slight gritty feeling.  Surgery itself wasn’t painful and there again I find there are differences.  I had my eye frozen but no IV.  Was offered Ativan to calm my nerves and anxiety but that was it.  

      Perhaps might be in part due to type of surgery.  Some clinics use laser and others more traditional method )my own was done using

      Phacoemulsification (modern cataract surgery in which the eye's internal lens is emulsified with an ultrasonic handpiece and aspirated from the eye. )

      I felt pressure but no pain.

      But others have described a lot of pain.   

      This must be extremely frustrating for you and it doesn’t sound as though your doctors want to explore or get to the bottom of why your eyesight is still blurry.

    • Posted

      I have no other issues with my eyes other than the Dr. saying at that time my right eye needed lens implants.My left eye was much better than my right eye at that time.

      The surgeon ask me if I wanted to proceed to get the left one done ,at which that time he will eventually get worst as I get older.Now my left eye is worst than my right eye,with the black shadow and light flash in the dark syndrome. I had YAG done on my right eye 3 weeks ago,at first it seemed to have improvement,now I see double vision and blurriness at times.I go for a follow up Wednesday with respect to my YAG treatment.I don't think I will be able to read any further down the eye chart than what I did prior to the treatment.

      Has for the left eye,I'm not sure what he will suggest to do with it.Has for your percentage values  on cataract surgery,I feel that their is a lot more people having blurriness and other problems than what the surveys indicate,from what I have seen people go through here on the Patient site.

    • Posted

      I would agree with you except for the fact that most people who are happy with their results never bother to seek out a forum such as this to register their excellent results, people are usually here looking for answers before surgery or assistance after surgery. What exactly is this YAG procedure? My doctor's use of medical terminology is limited to "cloudy membranes" which I now understand translates to PCO, I think. I appreciate any information. Thanks

    • Posted

      I was instructed to take

      (1)antibiotics starting 3 days before surgery on the left eye and continuing for about 10 days or more after the surgery, additionally, the steroid drops 2 different bottles ( ProLensa) and something else were to be started after the surgery, this was on the eye with the Toric lense. The right eye with the standard lense was slightly different with a change in the instructions for one of the steroids, so I was taking antibiotics and steroid drops 3 days before the surgery. Weird, I know. Again I am unfamiliar with these medical terms so I have no idea what Phaecoemulsifaction is, however I had non laser removal of both cataracts. As a medicare patient you have a choice Medicare only pays for standard cataract removal surgery which translates to, " if you want to pay for them to use a laser it will cost you just under $4K per eye" and for that these doctors throw in the lense. I opted for standard surgery and paid $2200 for the Toric lense,(1) the other replacement lense was "standard" so that one didn't cost me anything except perhaps my ability to read. Medicare changed the payment for these lenses in 2007 prior to that you could get a Toric lense without shelling out $2200, that I'm sure was our wonderful AMA doing their best for their membership. I just can't wait to see what changes are coming down the pike with all this noise in the newspapers about the financial condition of the Medicare trust. Under this present administration it's anybody's guess and I can imagine people having to make brutal,

      unconscionable decisions regarding their health care as our population ages. We are in uncharted territory now.

    • Posted

      Phacoemulsification cataract surgery is a procedure in which an ultrasonic device is used to break up and then remove a cloudy lens, or cataract, from the eye to improve vision. The insertion of an intraocular lens (IOL) usually immediately follows phacoemulsification.

      Our Canadian Medicare may too have to undergo change.  Many private clinics emerging and if people have funds pay $500 for an MRI to get results sooner vs waiting 6 months to a year.  Even my cataract surgery (although completely covered by Medicare) was a 7 month wait for first surgery.  Surgeon paid same amount no matter the lens selection.  I paid $900 each eye for upgrade to Symfony Lens.  A toric lens would have been $300 if I needed that.

      I believe a few Canadian hospitals have laser but most still don’t - major cities would.   Again if you want to pay for procedure you can have it done privately.

      Despite these forums which give people impression this surgery doesn’t go as well as stated I still think opposite is true.  If one was satisfied with results (without researching ahead of time) they would not look for this forum or be inclined to comment.

      Did you have this done privately?  I would think that surgeon should be held accountable to find out what went wrong in your case.  If done though national health you may want to have someone not associated with clinic you saw take a look to see what went wrong.

      I cant see anything wrong with drops or steps you took and there must be an explanation as to what is wrong.

      One thing you might want to do is see an optometrist (not the one you regularly see and diagnosed and referred you to your surgeon) to get a written prescription of where your eye is.  That might be very telling.  

      Good luck Salty0 - feel for your situation.  Terryifing not to see well and be able to function at your job.  I felt like that with cataracts.  You wouldn’t believe how quickly my vision deteriorated with them.

    • Posted

      YAG(yttrium-aluminum-garnet)Laser,it's a treatment used to clean up the lens implant after cataract surgery.From what the Surgeon told me is that in some cases they don't get all the cataract particles/membranes out during the surgery procedure.it's usually out around the rim of the capsulate.If this is the case they will have a tendency to migrate to the back of the lens resulting in the back of the lens being cloudy, similar to looking through a piece of wax paper from what he told me.Hopefully this explains to you what YAG treatment is.For more information on this YAG treatment ,just google it . 

    • Posted

      Hi Freeman - thanks for that description.  I was also told that particularly in younger patients it is not just a question of not getting all the particles/membranes but they actually grow back.  A square edge IOL will prevent that from happening more than a round edge lens but can still occur.  
    • Posted

      Medicare works differently here in the US. You qualify for Medicare once you reach the age of 65 or if you are judged to be disabled and are receiving Social Security disability benefits. I'm over 65. After going to see an optometrist a number of years ago and finding that I had high pressure in each eye it was suggested that I get that pressure checked every 6 months and I was considered " Pre- Glaucoma" or a Glaucoma suspect with that news I started to see an opthamologist for all those tests to determine what if any damage was done by this high pressure. I was told that I have thick corneas which was a good thing. This opthamology practice is the same one I've been seeing since that diagnosis 7 or 8 years ago. Most medical practices accept Medicare insurance just as they accept other private insurance plans. So to answer your question this is a "private" practice there isn't any "public" clinics they are all independent of the Government, however most of the larger hospitals will accept Medicaid, which is the Government sponsored medical insurance for the low income families or individuals between the ages of 0-64 years of age who can't afford private insurance or are unemployed, this is what the ACA or Obama Care was all about, but thanks to the Republicans & Trump they all but killed that one by abolishing the individual mandate, long stupid story of our shortsighted leaders who want to MAGA. Sorry to go on that tangent but just wanted you to understand how health insurance works here. I am stuck with who I have for the moment, no doctor really wants to clean up someone else's mess if that's what this is so I will see this doctor tomorrow and demand answers, at least I'll know the questions to ask thanks wholly to the very well informed people on this forum. When I get those answers whether I like them or not I will seek a second opinion and as I've said before there's no circumstances under which I will allow this doctor to do any further surgeries on my eyes. I've lost all confidence.

    • Posted

      Thank you I appreciate your taking the time to explain the terminology to me. My last consultation with my doctors they touched on such a proceedure but kept it to one sentence about "going in with a laser to clean things up" really trying to minimize this situation which is only leading to me trusting them less and less.

    • Posted

      So sorry to hear what you are going through. I too have this "film" that comes and goes. I include beets green and Red Amaranth (Amaranthus Cruentus) in my diet; they are to me what spinach is to PopEye. wink Hope your vision is on the mend soon.

    • Posted

      Posterior Capsule Opacity (PCO):

      One of the most common cataract surgery complications is a posterior capsule opacity (also called posterior capsule opacification or PCO).

      Posterior capsule opacity or PCO. The PCO has been removed with a YAG laser.

      A procedure called a YAG laser capsulotomy can quickly restore vision following posterior capsular opacification.

      Although some people call PCO a "secondary cataract," it really is not a cataract. Once a cataract is removed, it does not come back.

      During cataract surgery, your surgeon will remove the cloudy natural lens of your eye (cataract) and replace it with an intraocular lens (IOL). Much of the thin clear membrane that surrounds the natural lens (called the lens capsule) is left intact during surgery and the IOL usually is implanted within it.

      When the cataract is removed, your surgeon makes every attempt to maintain the integrity of the lens capsule, and normally your vision after cataract surgery should be very clear.

      However, in about 20 percent of patients, the posterior portion of the capsule becomes hazy some time during cataract surgery recovery or even months later, causing PCO. Posterior capsule opacification occurs because lens epithelial cells remaining after cataract surgery have grown on the capsule.

      In some cases, if the condition progresses significantly, your vision may be worse than it was before cataract surgery.

      Treating Posterior Capsule Opacity (PCO):

      Fortunately, a YAG laser can treat posterior capsule opacity safely, effectively and painlessly. This procedure, known as YAG laser capsulotomy, often can be performed in your doctor's office.

      YAG laser capsulotomy involves just a few simple steps:

          Usually the eye is dilated before the procedure, with dilating eye drops.

          A laser removes the hazy posterior capsule from your line of sight without making an incision or "touching" the eye.

          Many ophthalmologists recommend anti-inflammatory eye drops following the procedure.

      The procedure takes only a few minutes and is entirely painless; nor does discomfort occur post-operatively.

      You must remain still during the procedure, however. Very uncooperative patients, such as children and mentally disabled people, may require sedation.

      Following a YAG laser capsulotomy, you may resume normal activities immediately. You may experience some floaters afterward. These will likely resolve within a few weeks.

      Most people can expect their vision to improve within a day. As with any eye procedure, however, call your eye doctor immediately if vision worsens or fails to improve.

      Because the YAG laser removes the central zone of the cloudy posterior capsule behind the intraocular lens, the condition cannot return. So only one laser treatment is required to permanently eliminate vision loss caused by posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery.

      YAG Laser Capsulotomy Risks:

      Although a YAG laser capsulotomy poses slight additional risk, overall the procedure is extremely safe. The most important risk is that the retina can become detached from the inner back of the eye.

      Statistics suggest that the lifetime risk of a detached retina as a cataract surgery complication in the United States is about 1 percent. That number rises to about 2 percent after YAG laser capsulotomy. It is important to be aware of this cataract surgery risk.

    • Posted

      Thanks for explaining the healthcare system in US - I hadn’t realized the diffference between yours and canada’s.  Everyone no matter the age qualifies for Canadian Medicare if you are a citizen.  There are pros and cons to it as mentioned before.

      I won’t comment on your MAGA - I imagine your country is quite divided.  I vacation plenty in USA and met many wonderful people.  Can’t judge people by who is in power.

      Yes I can understand your situation now and the frustration with it.   Really hope you find a kinder surgeon who will clean up someone else mess if need be.

    • Posted

      Thank you for providing that very descriptive and informative piece of information. Aside from what has been stated here it is my understanding that once you have elected to undergo the YAG treatment you can never change those lenses because the YAG treatment destroys the membrane . I have no idea

      under what circumstances I would ever need to change the lenses that I now have because I know so little about these lenses and the after effects of YAG and/or cataract surgery but I am learning thanks to you guys, that's one of the questions I'll be adding tomorrow .

Report or request deletion

Thanks for your help!

We want the community to be a useful resource for our users but it is important to remember that the community are not moderated or reviewed by doctors and so you should not rely on opinions or advice given by other users in respect of any healthcare matters. Always speak to your doctor before acting and in cases of emergency seek appropriate medical assistance immediately. Use of the community is subject to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and steps will be taken to remove posts identified as being in breach of those terms.